Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03730220
Other study ID # 2018/1087
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date September 1, 2018
Est. completion date February 28, 2019

Study information

Verified date March 2019
Source Oslo University Hospital
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

The worldwide rate of induction of labour has been steadily increasing over the last 15 years, a trend that is reflected in Norway.

The overall aim of this study is to identify disparities between delivery departments in Norway in regards to:

1. The overall rate of labour induction

2. Main indication for the induction of labour.

3. Induction methods used and protocols followed

4. Maternal and fetal outcomes in induced births

Methods:

Observational study. Registration of induction indication, methods and outcomes in induced women. Data will be collected prospectively during a period of 4 months from 21 Norwegian delivery units using a web-based standardized case record form.


Description:

In 2000 the Norwegian national induction rate was 8.8% of all births, but this increased to 21.8% in 2016. The regional induction rate varies between counties, varying from 17.7% of all births in Nordland to 24.0% in Rogaland. Individual units could have an even wider variation. There are reports of a high rate of induction in primiparous women. In some units, local audits have noted that in 2016, over 27% of primiparous women had their labour induced. Labour inductions in primiparous women (Robson group 2a) may be associated with an increased likelihood of caesarean sections and operative vaginal delivery. An increased caesarean rate in primiparous women will have implications for subsequent pregnancies. In Hammerfest Hospital, the caesarean section rate in Robson group 2a was 37% in 2016.

In Norway, induction of labour is offered in approximately 50 obstetric units. There are national guidelines available for the induction of labour from the Norwegian Gynaecological Society and from the Department of Health. , These guidelines are not categorical and leave the decision for the specific method, or regimen for labour induction, up to the attending gynaecologist or local departments. Thus, the national protocols between departments vary considerably and women living in different regions of Norway do not have the same options for induction of labour.

The Norwegian situation reflects the international situation where multiple induction protocols exist. There is no consensus regarding the medical criteria for the identification of women for induction of labour, nor the induction methods or protocols used.

Aim

The overall aim of this study is to identify disparities between delivery departments in Norway in regards to:

1. The overall rate of labour induction

2. Main indication for the induction of labour.

3. Induction methods used and protocols followed

4. Maternal and fetal outcomes in induced births

Methods:

Observational study where we perform a prospective registration of induction indication, methods and outcomes in induced women on a common internet platform electronic case record form (e-CRF) through Service For Sensitive Data/Tjeneste For Sensitive Data (TSD), University of Oslo (UiO).

Participating centres

1. AHUS

2. Arendal

3. Bærum

4. Drammen

5. Førde

6. Gjøvik

7. Haugesund

8. Hammerfest

9. Haukeland

10. Levanger

11. Lillehammer

12. Nordland Sentralsykehus

13. OUS Ullevål

14. OUS Rikshospitalet

15. Sykehuset i Vestfold

16. Sykehuset i Telemark

17. Tromsø

18. Trondheim

19. Kristiansand

20. Stavanger

21. Sykehuset Østfold, Kalnes

22. Ålesund

Data registration and project management :

Establishing an e-CRF at Service For Sensitive Data/Tjeneste For Sensitive Data (TSD) University of Oslo (UiO) (which each participating centre can access online to register variables. Project leader will apply for ethics permission from the Regional Ethics Committee. Each participating centre will apply for database permission from the local Protector of Patient Records (Personvernansvarlig).

Ethical considerations:

The individual health staff responsible for patient care will provide information about the study in Norwegian and English following the medical decision (that is taken independent of this study) to induce the patient. The patient has the right to refuse participation in the study.

Project committee:

Ingvil Krarup Sørbye, Kevin Sunde Oppegaard, Anne Flem Jacobsen

International advisor: Professor Andrew D. Weeks, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Liverpool Women's Hospital, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L8 7SS, UK.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 1846
Est. completion date February 28, 2019
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers
Gender Female
Age group N/A and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Induced women with no previous vaginal delivery

- Gestational age from 23+0 weeks

- Viable pregnancy at time of inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

- Previous vaginal delivery

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
Norway Oslo University Hospital Oslo

Sponsors (18)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Oslo University Hospital Førde Central Hospital, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Fonna, Helse Møre og Romsdal HF, Helse Nord, Helse Stavanger HF, Levanger Hospital, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Nordlandssykehuset HF, Sorlandet Hospital HF, St. Olavs Hospital, Sykehuset i Vestfold HF, Sykehuset Innlandet HF, Sykehuset Ostfold, Sykehuset Telemark, University Hospital, Akershus, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Norway, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Caesarean rate Caesarean rate in induced women Throughout the study period of 3 months
Secondary Time from induction to delivery Time from induction initiation to delivery of baby in minutes From start of medication/balloon until time of birth of baby
Secondary Composite infant outcome Low Apgar score and/or transfer to NICU and/or low pH in umbilical artery From time of delivery until time of discharge of patient from maternity unit
Secondary Uterine tachysystole during labour More than 5 contractions each 10 minutes and fetal tracing abnormality From start of labour as defined by opening of partograph until time of birth of baby
Secondary Indication for induction of labour Proportions of main indications for labour induction Throughout the study period of 3 months
Secondary Induction method used Proportions of different induction methods/protocols used Throughout the study period of 3 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05100264 - Effect of Acidic Vaginal pH on the Efficacy of Dinoprostone for Labor Induction N/A
Completed NCT05037617 - The REDUCED-I Pilot Trial: REDucing the Utilization of CEsarean Sections With Induction N/A
Recruiting NCT06272591 - Comparison of Patient Satisfaction With Home Induction and In-patient Induction.
Completed NCT03670836 - Comparison of Misoprostol Ripening Efficacy With Dilapan Phase 4
Completed NCT04017247 - Continuous Versus Intermittent Oxytocin Infusion for Induction of Labor N/A
Completed NCT05062343 - Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening N/A
Completed NCT02788305 - Effect of Maternal Obesity on Labour Induction in Postdate Pregnancy N/A
Terminated NCT04004845 - Labor Protocol Study
Recruiting NCT06053073 - Induction to Labour With Double Cervical Ballon at Home Versus at Hospital N/A
Completed NCT04645823 - Spinal Fentanyl or Epidural Analgesia in the Early First Phase of Induced Labor Phase 4
Completed NCT04746248 - Outpatient Labor Induction Using Oral Misoprostol in Norway N/A
Recruiting NCT05671224 - Visual Aids for Induction of Labor RCT N/A
Completed NCT04756089 - Stimulation Therapy for Inducing Mothers N/A
Recruiting NCT05798728 - Outpatient Transcervical Balloon For Induction of Labor N/A
Withdrawn NCT04739683 - Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04307199 - Membrane Sweeping to Prevent Post-term Pregnancy: The MILO Study N/A
Completed NCT03725397 - Inpatient Versus Outpatient Foley Cervical Ripening Study N/A
Recruiting NCT05719467 - SAINT: Safe Induction of Labor Trial Phase 3
Completed NCT03113227 - Value of Measuring Cervical Angle and Length by Ultrasound in Prediction of Successful Induction of Delivery N/A