Incisional Hernia Clinical Trial
— PROMISSOfficial title:
PROphylactic Mesh to Prevent Incisional Hernias at the Former Stoma Site: the PROMISS-trial
Rationale:
Approximately 7000 stomata are created in the Netherlands every year. The occurrence of a
parastomal herniation is high, with a reported incidence of 4-48%. Also, the former stoma
site is at increased risk for the development of an incisional hernia. A clinical incisional
hernia rate of 30% is reported after stoma reversal. Herniation can cause pain, deformity and
possibly incarceration, which results in a significant impact on the quality of life of the
patient.
The hypothesis of this study is that the use of a prophylactic mesh at the time of stoma
formation leads to a lower incidence of incisional hernias after stoma reversal, an improved
quality of life and therefore a possible cost reduction in healthcare.
Objective:
To evaluate the incidence of incisional hernias after stoma reversal after preventive mesh
placement compared to no mesh placement. In addition, we aim to assess the effect of
preventive mesh placement on the quality of life and the effect on healthcare cost reduction
by avoiding re-intervention.
Study design:
A multicentre double blind randomized controlled trial with a total follow up of 24 months.
Study population:
Adults (18-99) undergoing bowel resection with the formation of a temporary stoma.
Intervention:
A preventive mesh will be placed using a sublay keyhole technique (pre-peritoneal,
retromuscular) at stoma formation. The mesh will be left in situ after stoma reversal and the
hole in the mesh will be closed, to prevent incisional herniation.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
- Primary: Incidence of incisional hernias after stoma reversal
- Secondary: Quality of life, stoma related prolapse or parastomal herniation, cost
effectiveness and mesh related complications.
Nature and extent of the burden and the risks associated with participation, benefit and
group relatedness:
The standard surgical procedure for the treatment of parastomal hernias is used in a
prophylactic fashion. As this is standard care in parastomal hernias the risks are minimal.
The mesh that is used is CE approved. The burden of participation in this study is minimal
for the patient all follow-up visits coincide with the regular visits for colorectal cancer.
Hence, no extra outpatient department visits, and even no additional diagnostics nor other
medical procedures that could potentially burden the patient, are required.
Status | Not yet recruiting |
Enrollment | 130 |
Est. completion date | March 1, 2023 |
Est. primary completion date | March 1, 2023 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 99 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Age = 18 years - Diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma - Bowel resection following stoma formation, intended to be temporary. - Elective surgery - ASA-score I-III - Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: - Emergency operation - Peritonitis (i.e. bowel perforation) - Bowel obstruction - A life expectancy of less than 2 years (distant metastasis i.e. located in the liver, peritoneum, lung, cerebral or bone) - Earlier hernia repair with mesh placed in a 10cm proximity of the future stoma site. - Chronic use of antibiotics - Chronic use of immunosuppressive medication - ASA-score IV or above - Not able to sign informed consent - Patient being unable to speak Dutch - Patient allergic to one of the components of the mesh |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | Maastricht University Medical Centre | Maastricht | Limburg |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Maastricht University Medical Center |
Netherlands,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Occurrence of incisional hernia at the former stoma site. | Incidence of incisional hernia Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Occurrence of parastomal hernia | Incidence of parastomal hernia Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Occurence of prolapse | Incidence of prolapse Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Occurence of mesh infection | Incidence of mesh infection Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Occurence of wound infections | Incidence of wound infections Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Occurence of Seroma | Incidence of seroma Expressed in % ranging from 0-100%, a lower percentage is considered a better outcome. | 24 months | |
Secondary | Quality of life score | Quality of life postoperatively assessed through questionnaires. - EQ-5D-5L (0-25), lower is considered a better outcome |
24 months | |
Secondary | Quality of life score | Quality of life postoperatively assessed through questionnaires. - Carolina Comfort scale (0-40), lower is considered a better outcome. |
24 months | |
Secondary | Quality of life score | Quality of life postoperatively assessed through questionnaires. - EORTC QLQ-CR29 (0-228), lower is considered a better outcome. |
24 months | |
Secondary | Operation length | Time from start of the operation to finish (min), longer operation time can be an indication of a more complex procedure. | during operation | |
Secondary | Time to stoma reversal | Time between creation of the stoma and its reversal, will be expressed in days. (minimum of 14 days to a maximum of 730 days). It will be measured from creation of stoma to reversal, which is 6 weeks on average, if the stoma is not reversed within 24 months the patient is excluded. For it will not be able to reach the primary endpoint. Delay of reversal of the stoma may indicate that patient condition or other patient related factors are not optimal. | time from stoma creation to reversal | |
Secondary | Cost-effectiveness | Cost benefit analysis involving health cost and societal cost due to inability to participate in work. Lower health care cost are considered a better outcome, it is hypothesised that preventive treatment results in less cost by avoiding reoperations and readmission on the long term. Assessment will be performed using questionnaires; the iMCQ questionnaires for cost effectiveness analysis. The questions of the questionnaire will be analysed separately, for the questions range from yes/no questions to multiple choice or questions regarding number of days/ hours worked. |
24 months | |
Secondary | Cost-effectiveness | Cost benefit analysis involving health cost and societal cost due to inability to participate in work. Lower health care cost are considered a better outcome, it is hypothesised that preventive treatment results in less cost by avoiding reoperations and readmission on the long term. Assessment will be performed using questionnaires; the iPCQ questionnaires for cost effectiveness analysis. The questions of the questionnaire will be analysed separately, for the questions range from yes/no questions to multiple choice or questions regarding number of days/ hours worked. |
24 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06016426 -
Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05734222 -
Optimization of Surgical Treatment of Patients With Incisional Ventral Hernias
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT03105895 -
Prevention of Incisional Hernia With an Onlay Mesh Visible on MRI
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02089958 -
Standardization of Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01961687 -
A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00998907 -
PDS*Plus and Wound Infections After Laparotomy
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00498810 -
COMplete Versus PArtial Open inCisional Hernia Repair (COMPAC-TRIAL)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04961346 -
RCT Comparing Lightweight vs. Heavyweight Meshes in Incisional Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT03912662 -
ProGripTM Self-Gripping Polyester Mesh in Incisional Hernia Prevention
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05620121 -
ACute Treatment of Incisional Ventral Hernia
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03561727 -
Risk Factors for Development of Incisional Hernia in Transverse Incisions
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03938688 -
Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05568238 -
Vacuum Assisted Wound Closure and Permanent On-lay Mesh-mediated Fascial Traction in Patients With Open Abdomen
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT02896686 -
Efficacy of an Onlay Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop Ileostomy Closure
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT02277262 -
PROPHYlactic Implantation of BIOlogic Mesh in Peritonitis (PROPHYBIOM)
|
Phase 4 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02328352 -
"BP as a New Device for Surgery and Solid Cancer and Hematopoietic System Tumors Treatment. Effects of BP Implantation"
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Suspended |
NCT01520168 -
Composix Kugel Mesh Recall Leaves Unresolved Problems of Patient Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05579652 -
Change in Fascial Tension in Open Abdomens
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03390764 -
Hernia After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02321059 -
Validation of the Goodstrength System for Assessment of Abdominal Wall Strength in Patients With Incisional Hernia
|
N/A |