Impaired Health Clinical Trial
Official title:
Dental Hygienist Support Promotes Good Oral Health in Nursing Homes
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dental hygienist support on
oral health and attitudes to oral healthcare in nursing homes for older people.
Background: Studies in long-term care facilities have indicated that oral health is often
unsatisfactory. It is important that nursing staff are able to assist dependent care
recipients. Dental hygienist support has been suggested as valuable help.
Material and methods: Two nursing homes were randomly selected for intervention and control.
Interventions included weekly support from dental hygienists on oral hygiene procedures,
prescriptions for individual oral hygiene procedures, and oral care organisational issues.
The residents' oral health, measured by dental plaque levels, gingival bleeding and the
Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG), was evaluated before and after three months. Attitudes
among the staff to oral healthcare were collected through a questionnaire.
Introduction Oral health in older people has been the subject of several studies from
different perspectives in recent decades. These studies describe the difficulties in
achieving a holistic view in healthcare when it comes to oral health for older people, and a
lack of awareness among nursing staff that infections in the oral cavity may also affect
other parts of the body. In a randomised study, it was shown that professional oral
healthcare may improve oral conditions in elderly people. Studies have shown correlations
between poor oral hygiene and pneumonia in elderly people. It has also been shown that both
chewing ability and daily nutritional intake may be adversely affected in individuals with
partial or full dentures compared to those with natural teeth or crown and bridge work.
To ensure good oral health and function, it is of great importance that nursing staff are
able to support dependent older people in their daily oral care. Basic oral health knowledge
among nursing staff and further training in oral hygiene procedures have been reported to be
essential to good quality in oral care. In a study from Norway, it was shown that the
residents' oral hygiene in nursing homes was significantly improved when an oral healthcare
program was introduced. The program consisted of new procedures and tools for good oral
hygiene, as well as practical training in oral care for nursing staff.
An earlier study by the authors of the present study captured the views of staff in various
nursing homes for older people on important aspects for well-functioning daily oral care for
residents. This study emphasised organisational structures involving oral hygiene
procedures, staff approach regarding prioritising oral hygiene and keeping up skills in oral
hygiene procedures, and staff views on residents' needs including matters such as how to act
when a resident refuses help with oral care. Support by a dental hygienist in the nursing
home was perceived as valuable help. Other authors have made similar findings in long-term
care facilities, indicating that oral hygiene may be unsatisfactory due to organisational
factors such as lack of a standard protocol for oral hygiene procedures, lack of time and
conflicting priorities, lack of knowledge among care providers and cooperation difficulties
among some residents.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of dental hygienist support on oral
health and attitudes to oral health care in nursing homes for older people.
Material and Methods The study had a quantitative design with two comparable study groups
with older people in two nursing homes. The two most centrally situated public nursing homes
in the largest municipality in the county of Värmland in Sweden were randomly selected as
intervention and control group. The Regional Ethical Review Board in Uppsala approved the
study.
Study material The two nursing homes were comparable regarding size, resident profile, and
staffing. The residents included older people with dementia, physical disabilities or
long-term illnesses. One director of nursing, one registered nurse and 21 nursing assistants
worked at the intervention nursing home. One director of nursing, one registered nurse and
28 nursing assistants worked at the control nursing home. All but one of the staff members
were women. There were 33 residents in each of the two nursing homes. Only dentate residents
were included.
Procedures The Director of Social Services in the municipality was given verbal and written
information and approved the study. The directors of nursing at the intervention and control
nursing homes were separately informed, both verbally and in writing, about the procedures
for their respective part of the study. They were not informed which additional nursing home
was participating in the study. The directors of nursing at both nursing homes supplied the
residents or their relatives with written information about the study and asked for written
consent. Only those who consented to participate in the study were included. Edentulous
residents were excluded from the study. The nursing assistants agreed to participate in the
study.
Intervention
In the intervention nursing home, the study dental hygienists offered regular support over
the course of three months, comprising the following:
- Participation in staff meetings with the director of nursing and nursing assistants at
the beginning of the study, after six weeks and at the end of the study period. At
those meetings, oral care routines were discussed and a concept of prescriptions for
individual oral hygiene procedures was introduced (see below).
- Visits to the nursing home once a week. For two hours in the morning, the dental
hygienists accompanied and supported the nursing staff in their oral hygiene care and
gave advice on daily oral hygiene procedures for each resident participating in the
study. Specific difficulties concerning residents with cooperation problems were
addressed. Each weekly visit ended with a 30 min meeting in which the nursing staff had
the opportunity to discuss oral hygiene procedures and oral health issues with the
dental hygienists.
- Individual written oral hygiene prescriptions for special oral hygiene devices,
procedures or products. These were issued by the dental hygienists to residents with an
identified need for extra oral care support, i.e. with scores >1 in the Revised Oral
Assessment Guide (ROAG) evaluation.
Control
At study start, the director of nursing for the control nursing home was informed about the
importance of good oral hygiene and was invited to contact the two study dental hygienists
if support was needed with any particular oral health issue or dental hygiene procedure.
Clinical evaluation of oral health Clinical evaluations of the residents' oral health status
were blinded. An independent dentist and dental hygienist, otherwise not committed to the
planning of the study and not informed about which was the intervention nursing home,
conducted a dental examination of the residents who had consented to take part in the study
in both nursing homes. This was done at the beginning of the study and three months later at
the end of the study. The staff were not informed about the scheduled time for the clinical
evaluations of the residents' oral health.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02502292 -
Innovative Policies for Healthy Aging
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02482896 -
The Lolland-Falster Health Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02502305 -
Liveonline Training Course to Improve Food Habits and Enhance Physical Activity in Older Adults
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01804855 -
Effectiveness of a Smartphone App for Adolescent Obesity Management
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02829138 -
Personalized Nutrition in Young Adults: The Ability of Genetic Information to Motivate Changes in Omega-3 Consumption
|
N/A |