Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05100290 |
Other study ID # |
B076201836758-1 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
June 15, 2018 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2021 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The Hyperventilation Provocation Test (HPTest) associated with end-tidal CO2 pressure
(PETCO2) measurement is a diagnostic tool for idiopathic hyperventilation syndrome (HVS).
However, interpretation of HPTest remains unclear regarding the relevant PETCO2 values to
consider and the occurrence of subjective symptoms.
This case-control study aims to identify accurate HPTest measurements for the diagnosis of
HVS, regardless of symptoms occurrence.
Description:
In a first stage, the investigators will analyze in a prospective way a training cohort of
HPTest datas from 74 subjects, involving 37 subjects with complaints and a Nijmegen
questionnaire score of ≥23/64 (HVS+) matched on gender, age, height, weight and BMI category
with 37 healthy controls without complaints and a Nijmegen questionnaire score of <23/64
(HVS-)(16).
All data will have to be collected by the same equipment and by the same operators in the
pulmonology department of the CHU-St Pierre-Brussels between June 2018 and October 2021.
To rule out confounding respiratory pathology, each participant will have completed
spirometry and methacholine testing, that will have a result within expected normal values.
For both cohorts, kinetics of the PETCO2 recorded during each of the 3 phases of the HPTest
(adaptation, hyperventilation and recovery) will be mathematically modeled by an curvilinear
model with the parameters (A, A', a and a') noted from the kinetic equation (TAU) : TAU
[PETCO2(t)〖=A+a(1-exp〗^((b-t)/c))]. For any observed differences in parameters between
groups, the Area Under Curves will be estimated at the cut-off that offers the best
Sensitivity and Specificity. False negative and false positive rates will be estimated.
The probability of a type I error is set at 5%.
In a second stage, in order to confirm/infirm the results, a retrospective validation cohort
from another care setting, including subjects without confounding pathology, who completed a
Nijmegen questionnaire and a HVTest between 2018 and 2021, will be analysed in the same way
than the training cohort.