Humeral Diaphysis Fracture Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diaphyseal Fractures of the Humerus: A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing the Conservative Treatment and the Surgical Treatment.
Verified date | December 2012 |
Source | Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | Canada: Ethics Review Committee |
Study type | Interventional |
The fracture of the humeral diaphysis is a condition that represents 2% of all fractures.
The conservative treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus has long been considered
the only option and the surgical treatment was primarily reserved for displaced fractures
with no contact of bone ends. However, for a few years there has been an upsurge of
indications for the surgical treatment of diaphyseal fractures.
The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes and the quality of life of
surgically treated patients versus those who undergo a conservative treatment.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 4 |
Est. completion date | July 2014 |
Est. primary completion date | December 2012 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female over 18 years - Fracture of the humeral diaphysis - Recent fracture (14 days or less) - Closed fracture - Signing of consent form Exclusion Criteria: - Segmental fracture of the humerus - Fracture with proximal or distal intra articular extension - Open fracture - Polytrauma - Floating elbow or shoulder - Pathological fracture - Simultaneous fracture of both humerus - Associated vascular disease - Severe neuromuscular disorders such as Parkinson, hemiparesis, myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophy, etc. ... - medical contraindication to surgery - severe central neurological disease disabling patient to fill in questionnaires (senile dementia, Alzheimer's, etc ... - Male or female unable to consent - Any other condition which prevents the assessor from fully monitoring the patient during study |
Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Canada | Hôpital l'Enfant-Jésus | Quebec | |
Canada | CHA-Pavillon Enfant-Jésus | Québec | Quebec |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Hopital de l'Enfant-Jesus |
Canada,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Function and quality of life on DASH scale | The function and quality of life are measured using the DASH scale six months after treatment. | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | DASH score | The function and quality of life are measured using the DASH scale 6 months after treatment. | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Return to professional activities | It will be determined in days after surgery, to rates of 50% and 100% of the usual workload. | 3 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | SF-36 score | This score will help validate the impact on quality of life of both types of treatment. It includes 36 items asking about the recent quality of life. This will also enable better understanding of the impact in real time on the functional level. | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | DASH score | The function and quality of life are measured using the DASH scale 12 months after treatment. | 12 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | SF-36 score | This score will help validate the impact on quality of life of both types of treatment. It includes 36 items asking about the recent quality of life. This will also enable better understanding of the impact in real time on the functional level. | 12 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Proportion of additional surgeries | The evaluation of the rate of complications such as infection, implant removal, non-union, implant failure or malunion which necessitate additional surgery. | 12 months after surgery | No |
Secondary | Radiological loss of reduction | The main observed displacements occur in varus and are measured on an AP view of the humerus. Initial displacements are tolerated up to 20 degrees in varus and in flexion. We measure the proportion of patients who experienced worsening of the deformity of more than 5 degrees on both levels. |
2 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Radiological loss of reduction | The main observed displacements occur in varus and are measured on an AP view of the humerus. Initial displacements are tolerated up to 20 degrees in varus and in flexion. We measure the proportion of patients who experienced worsening of the deformity of more than 5 degrees on both levels. |
6 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Radiological loss of reduction | The main observed displacements occur in varus and are measured on an AP view of the humerus. Initial displacements are tolerated up to 20 degrees in varus and in flexion. We measure the proportion of patients who experienced worsening of the deformity of more than 5 degrees on both levels. |
12 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Radiological loss of reduction | The main observed displacements occur in varus and are measured on an AP view of the humerus. Initial displacements are tolerated up to 20 degrees in varus and in flexion. We measure the proportion of patients who experienced worsening of the deformity of more than 5 degrees on both levels. |
6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Union rate | The union is defined by the presence of a strong radiological callus associated with lack of pain at the fracture site. The humerus unifies in an average of three months. It is considered non-union if it is not unified after six months, and it is classified as delayed union between 3 and 6 months. The rates will be presented by the number of patients with non-union in each group. |
12 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Union rate | The union is defined by the presence of a strong radiological callus associated with lack of pain at the fracture site. The humerus unifies in an average of three months. It is considered non-union if it is not unified after six months, and it is classified as delayed union between 3 and 6 months. The rates will be presented by the number of patients with non-union in each group. |
6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Rates of complication | The main complications recognized in the treatment of humerus fractures are: infection, nerve damage, malunion and non-unions. Each complication will be recorded and reported. | within the first year following treatment | No |
Secondary | Pain on visual analogue pain scale (VAS) | The measure will be carried out using a suitable rule designed for this type of measurement, counting only full of numbers 1 to 10. | 2 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Pain on VAS | The measure will be carried out using a suitable rule designed for this type of measurement, counting only full of numbers 1 to 10. | 6 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Pain on VAS | The measure will be carried out using a suitable rule designed for this type of measurement, counting only full of numbers 1 to 10. | 12 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Pain on VAS | The measure will be carried out using a suitable rule designed for this type of measurement, counting only full of numbers 1 to 10. | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Pain on VAS | The measure will be carried out using a suitable rule designed for this type of measurement, counting only full of numbers 1 to 10. | 12 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the shoulder | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 180 °), abduction (180°), external rotation in the scapular plane (90 °) and internal rotation in the plane scapula (60°). | 2 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the shoulder | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 180 °), abduction (180°), external rotation in the scapular plane (90 °) and internal rotation in the plane scapula (60°). | 6 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the shoulder | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 180 °), abduction (180°), external rotation in the scapular plane (90 °) and internal rotation in the plane scapula (60°). | 12 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the shoulder | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 180 °), abduction (180°), external rotation in the scapular plane (90 °) and internal rotation in the plane scapula (60°). | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the shoulder | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 180 °), abduction (180°), external rotation in the scapular plane (90 °) and internal rotation in the plane scapula (60°). | 12 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the elbow | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 140 °), extension (normal value 0 °), pronation (normal value 80 °) and supination (normal value 80 °). | 2 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the elbow | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 140 °), extension (normal value 0 °), pronation (normal value 80 °) and supination (normal value 80 °). | 6 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the elbow | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 140 °), extension (normal value 0 °), pronation (normal value 80 °) and supination (normal value 80 °). | 12 weeks after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the elbow | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 140 °), extension (normal value 0 °), pronation (normal value 80 °) and supination (normal value 80 °). | 6 months after treatment | No |
Secondary | Measurement of range of motion of the elbow | Using a goniometer, we will measure the bending (normal value 140 °), extension (normal value 0 °), pronation (normal value 80 °) and supination (normal value 80 °). | 12 months after treatment | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04917536 -
Comparison of the Speed of Functional Recovery (Constant Score) Between Two Different Approaches of Humeral Nailing in Humeral Fractures: Through the Rotator Cuff or Through the Rotator Interval Split (HUNAAP)
|
N/A |