ICIT: Recall A Multicentre Study of Consent For Hip Fractures

Hip Fractures Clinical Trial

— ICIT: Recall  

Official title:

Improving Consent In Trauma: Recall (ICIT: Recall) A Multicentre Study of Consent For Hip Fractures

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06439537
• Other study ID #: AC23137
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Start date: July 2024
• Est. completion date: September 2024

Study information

• Verified date: May 2024
• Source: NHS Lothian
• Contact: Nicholas Clement, MBBS, MD, PhD, FRCS (T&O)
• Phone: 0131 2426462
• Email: Nick.Clement[@]nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Hip fractures are a major cause litigation in patients undergoing trauma surgery. Common causes of litigation in hip operations are alleged incompetent surgery and development of pressure sources, both of which are associated with poor quality of consent. One aspect of poor consent is patients not being able to retain information discussed with them prior to their operation. There are many factors attributed to this, including pain in the acute setting, administration of sedating medications and the high rate of delirium in this patient cohort. However, even in individuals deemed to have capacity during the consent process, studies have shown that many were unable to explain what type of surgery they had or express knowledge of the potential complications. Importantly, the hip fracture patient demographic is very different from patients undergoing a planned procedure, in that they have had an acute injury following physical trauma, tend to be older and medically frailer. Research into the recall of patients undergoing gynaecological or abdominal surgeries further corroborate patients' poor recall of potential complications in the acute setting.

Patients with hip fractures face a range of risks, some of which can result in a substantial mortality rate regardless of whether surgery is performed. The list of complications includes infections in the hip joint and wound, development of pressure sores, occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and potential procedural failures. As such, the ability of patients to remember the discussed complications is critical to their well-being and overall quality of life and remains an unmet clinical need.

Description:

Improving Consent In Trauma: Recall (ICIT Recall) will be a multicentre quality improvement project within the NHS clinical care setting. The aim of this study is to assess hip fracture patient's ability retain information regarding their injury, proposed operation, potential complications, and alternatives. following obtaining formal written consent. To that end, the project is intended to be a multicentre study, with interviews across a range of different health boards. The investigators also wish to listen to individual patients' experience of the surgical consent process through a follow-up interview once it has been over one week since their operation. Part (1), the structured face-to-face questionnaire was established to identify the extent of the problem and what patients find memorable or overlooked about the consent process. Part (2), the interview was designed to obtain qualitative data on what patients find important and to allow the participants to tell their story. The overarching objective of this project is to empower patients so that they are more involved and have a greater understanding of the operation that they have consented to. This includes simple measures such as providing a patient information leaflet or improving communication with the patient or close family members during their consent process. Sometimes, poor retention of information is unavoidable due to the significant pain and stress patients are under, and for this reason our aim is to improve the quality of consent for major procedures like hip operations.

As part of the project, the investigators also wish to engage with and capture patient-cantered experiences through a further interview. The investigators aim to like to capture their experience of the consent process entirely from the patient's perspective. Patient stories are a powerful tool to promote culture change in patient care. Unlike surveys, patient stories allow a seamless flow of thoughts and feelings that can provide insight into their journey to recovery. Here, the aim is to highlight the importance of good communication and an overall clear consent process in promoting wellbeing. This aspect of care tends to be overlooked. Addressing this issue is particularly important in delivering compassionate care within the NHS.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 100
• Est. completion date: September 2024
• Est. primary completion date: September 2024
• Gender: All
• Age group: 50 Years to 110 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Inpatient on trauma and orthopaedic wards

• Is candidate for a hip fracture operation

• Able to provide informed consent

• Able to participate in a conversation (without the use of a translator)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Deemed to be too unwell or medically unstable to participate

• Under Adult With Incapacity Act or other detaining orders

• Patients scoring a 4AT score of 4 or more

• Unable to provide consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fractures, Bone
• Hip Fractures
• Hip Injuries

Intervention

Other:
• Semi-structured questionnaire
All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured questionnaire within 36 hours of admission
• Post-operative interview
All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured interview once they have reached post-operative day 7 or over

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh	Edinburgh	Scotland

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
NHS Lothian

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (8)

Bhangu A, Hood E, Datta A, Mangaleshkar S. Is informed consent effective in trauma patients? J Med Ethics. 2008 Nov;34(11):780-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.024471. — View Citation

Herrera-Perez M, Gonzalez-Martin D, Sanz EJ, Pais-Brito JL. Ethical Dilemmas with Regard to Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture: The Problem of Nonagenarians and Centenarians. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):1851. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071851. — View Citation

Howard A, Webster J, Quinton N, Giannoudis PV. 'Hobson's choice': a qualitative study of consent in acute surgery. BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):e037657. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037657. — View Citation

Kalisvaart KJ, Vreeswijk R, de Jonghe JF, van der Ploeg T, van Gool WA, Eikelenboom P. Risk factors and prediction of postoperative delirium in elderly hip-surgery patients: implementation and validation of a medical risk factor model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):817-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00704.x. — View Citation

Probert N, Malik AA, Lovell ME. Surgery for fractured neck of femur - are patients adequately consented? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Jan;89(1):66-9. doi: 10.1308/003588407X160846. — View Citation

Ring J, Talbot C, Cross C, Hinduja K. NHSLA litigation in hip fractures: Lessons learnt from NHSLA data. Injury. 2017 Aug;48(8):1853-1857. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.009. Epub 2017 Jun 19. — View Citation

Thiruchandran G, McKean AR, Rudran B, Imam MA, Yeong K, Hassan A. Improving consent in patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2018 May 2;79(5):284-287. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2018.79.5.284. — View Citation

Zalmay P, Collis J, Wilson H. Patients Lacking the Capacity to Consent to Hip Fracture Surgery May Be Undergoing Major Operations Without Their Next of Kin Being Involved in Best-Interests Decisions: A Quality Improvement Report. Cureus. 2021 Dec 10;13(12):e20322. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20322. eCollection 2021 Dec. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Incapacity	Proportion of individuals admitted with hip fractures that do not have capacity to consent. The measurement tool will be the 4AT.	Within 36 hours of admission
Primary	Retention of complications	Proportion of complications discussed initially in consenting individuals that were still retained by the time of interview (within 36 hours of admission).	Within 36 hours of admission
Secondary	Thematic analysis of narrative contents	The personal experience of giving consent for hip fracture operations through semi-structured questionnaires. The measurement tool is a thematic analysis using a qualitative coding framework, whereas the unit of measure is the frequency and prevalence of themes	Post-operative day 7 to post-operative day 28