Clinical Trials Logo

Hernia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Hernia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT04188236 Completed - Clinical trials for Disk Herniated Lumbar

Safety and Performance of a Hernia Blocking System

Start date: October 23, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Prospective, multi-center, single-arm clinical study to assess the performance of an Hernia Blocking System in preventing clinically symptomatic recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

NCT ID: NCT04187235 Completed - Parastomal Hernia Clinical Trials

Laparascopic Keyhole vs Sugarbaker Repair in Parastomal Hernia

Start date: January 1, 1997
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This is a non-randomised case-controlled prospective study of consecutive patients with parastomal hernia, comparing the laparoscopic Keyhole repair with the modified Sugarbaker repair.

NCT ID: NCT04186039 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Functional Evaluation of the Fetal Lung by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (MRI-BOLD), in Congenital Diaphragmatic and Parietal Malformations

BOLD FETUS
Start date: May 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The objective is to evaluate the quality of the response to the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent effect in fetuses with diaphragmatic hernias and abdominal wall malformations and to correlate with postnatal respiratory outcome. Pulmonary involvement is a constant in diaphragmatic hernias, it is classic in omphaloceles and especially hepatomphaloceles, and exceptional in laparoschisis. As this is an original exploratory study, no preliminary data are available. If a correlation is found, the Blood Oxygen Level Dependent effect of the fetal lung may be considered as an early functional marker of postnatal lung function. It can be used in addition to lung-to-head-ratio during prenatal counseling. The final goal is to be able to detect early in the fetus pulmonary insufficiency to help prenatal counseling and perinatal care.

NCT ID: NCT04184128 Completed - Cystocele Clinical Trials

Detrusor Underactivity and Bladder Outlet Obstruction in Women With Cystocele

Start date: November 1, 2010
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Women with cystocele may be associated with detrusor underactivity (DU) or bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). However, the impact of cystocele repair on the rates of DU and BOO remained obscure. Thus, the aim of this study was to elucidate the prevalence of DU and BOO in each age group and elucidate the impact of cystocele repair on the rates of DU and BOO.

NCT ID: NCT04179578 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Paraesophageal Hernia

The Value of Lateral Release in Reconstruction of the Diaphragmatic Hiatus Hernia

PEH2
Start date: July 16, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Patients scheduled for surgery for primary paraesophageal herniation are randomized to either conventional suturing of the crura or with the addition of lateral release.

NCT ID: NCT04173884 Recruiting - Ventral Hernia Clinical Trials

Video-based Collaborative Learning to Improve Ventral Hernia Repair

Start date: September 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Recent studies demonstrate the critical role of individual surgeon performance, including both the approach they take to an operation as well as their technical skill, in determining patient outcomes. Utilizing the rich data collected by the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), formerly Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC), for its 200 members performing ventral hernia repair in the United States, the investigators will examine the effectiveness of video-based collaborative learning to provide feedback and improve surgical performance and patient outcomes. A prospective randomized trial comparing two interventions is proposed, comparing live video-based surgical coaching and video-based feedback using time-stamped annotations that can be reviewed at a later time to a wait-list control group drawn from the same cohort of surgeons. The results have the immediate potential to improve the quality of care for the 350,000 patients requiring ventral hernia repair each year, while also providing critical evidence to support a novel approach to surgical performance improvement more broadly.

NCT ID: NCT04171921 Active, not recruiting - Ventral Hernia Clinical Trials

Robotic Versus Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair

Robovent
Start date: November 1, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Umbilical and epigastric hernia repair, whether considering primary or incisional hernias, are associated with a high risk of local complications, with global rate of surgical complications at one month up to 25%. To date three techniques are used. Open ventral hernia repair (OVHR) is associated with a high risk of surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, and hematoma, but is the main technique due to advantages such as cost-effectiveness, short operative time and totally extra-peritoneal repair. Laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR) reduces these complications but implies to place a mesh in intra-peritoneal position which is known to lead to adhesions, requires advanced laparoscopic skills, does not allow the closure of the defect due to limited range of motion, and can lead to excessive pain and pain-killers consumption due to the use of "tackers" to hold the mesh in place. Robotic ventral hernia repair (RVHR) uses the same laparoscopic access as LHR but thanks to the extended range of motion given by the robotic system allows defect closure, pre-peritoneal placement of the mesh and requires less technical skills. LHR is of very low adoption in Geneva University Hospital for the aforementioned inconvenient. Moreover, the final result of the procedure is not the same than with OVHR or RVHR, since the defect is not primarily closed and the mesh is in intra-peritoneal position. OVHR and RVHR , however, lead to the same final result and only defer by the access type (direct vs. laparoscopic). RVHR is gaining rapid popularity and adoption in the United States but remains a costly solution. It is unclear whether the supposed benefits for the patients of RVHR overwhelm the extra costs and time, especially by reducing the complication rate and consecutive in-hospital and out-hospital costs. Moreover, increasing experience of the robotic system in Geneva University Hospital has led to a significant costs and time reduction in other robotic procedures and could eventually make RVHR cost effective if its clinical benefits were to be proven. This study aims at demonstrating that robotic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (rTAPP) primary ventral hernia repair leads to lower surgical site complication rate than the same procedure performed through standard open approach (OVHR), while being an acceptable solution from an economic, operative time and functional standpoint.

NCT ID: NCT04171102 Completed - Inguinal Hernia Clinical Trials

Neo-nervegenesis in Inguinal Hernia Implant ProFlor

Start date: January 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The investigation is aimed at specifically demonstrating the ingrowth of newly formed nervous elements within a 3D dynamic responsive implant for inguinal hernia repair.

NCT ID: NCT04166201 Completed - Clinical trials for Incisional Hernia of Midline of Abdomen

Double Mesh Modification of Incisional Hernia Can be Effective Without Severe Local Complications

Start date: January 1, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

22 patients of incisional hernia underwent treatment by double mesh modification of the original Chevrel's technique the primary outcome was recurrence, skin necrosis secondery out come was pain hematoma seroma

NCT ID: NCT04152798 Completed - Clinical trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair Based on Collagen Study

Start date: January 1, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Groups of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias by primary posterior crural repair and crural repair with ProGrip™ mesh techniques were examined for recurrence rate of hiatal hernias, quality of life according to the GERD-HRQL questionnaire. Clinical evaluation was performed at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after surgery.