Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02526043
Other study ID # Huashan 002
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date August 2015
Est. completion date December 2022

Study information

Verified date August 2022
Source Fudan University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of the study is to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.


Description:

Liver resection is the most important treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Open hepatectomy was regarded as a giant surgery because of its big incision, influence of the liver function, and long hospital stay. Laparoscopic hepatectomy was widely used since it was reported by Reich in 1991. With the constant innovation of laparoscopic technique and equipment, there is no penalty area in laparoscopic hepatectomy. The Louisville consensus proposed that the best indication for laparoscopic hepatectomy was the tumor diameter < 5cm, located in segment II-VI. Previous studies shows that compared with the open surgery, laparoscopic hepatectomy has the advantages of shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter hospitalization time. The mortality, mobility, the overall survival and the disease-free survival was same in these two groups. So far, however, the curative effect and safety research of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC is limited to retrospective study and case-control study. A prospective, randomized, controlled study is urgently needed. This study was proceeded to observe the curative effect and safety of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for HCC.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 180
Est. completion date December 2022
Est. primary completion date December 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 75 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis was HCC 2. The tumor was located in segment: II, III, IVb, V, VI 3. The tumor diameter < 5cm 4. Without thrombosis in the portal vein, hepatic vein or bile duct 5. Without intrahepatic and systemic metastasis 6. The Child-pugh score was A-B7 7. The ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was I-III 8. The patient age was between 18-75 9. Sign the informed consent, and can fully understand the research content Exclusion Criteria: 1. Have surgery contraindications 2. Pregnant or lactating women 3. The Child-pugh score was B8-C 4. The ASA(American Society of Anesthesiologists) score was IV-V 5. With other malignant tumor 6. With mental illness 7. Participated in other clinical trials in the last three months 8. Underwent other treatments(chemotherapy or radiotherapy) before operation

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
laparoscopic hepatectomy
The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by laparoscopy
Open hepatectomy
The HCC patients who meet the Louisville consensus will underwent liver resection by open surgery

Locations

Country Name City State
China Huashan hospital Shanghai

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Fudan University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

References & Publications (13)

Afaneh C, Kluger MD. Laparoscopic liver resection: lessons at the end of the second decade. Semin Liver Dis. 2013 Aug;33(3):226-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351780. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Review. Danish, English. — View Citation

Bryant R, Laurent A, Tayar C, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection-understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Jul;250(1):103-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6660. — View Citation

Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. — View Citation

Cai XJ, Yang J, Yu H, Liang X, Wang YF, Zhu ZY, Peng SY. Clinical study of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumors. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2350-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9789-z. Epub 2008 Feb 23. — View Citation

Chen KH, Jeng KS, Huang SH, Chu SH. Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer--an innovative approach to the no-man's land. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Mar;17(3):522-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-2115-z. Epub 2013 Jan 8. — View Citation

Dagher I, Lainas P, Carloni A, Caillard C, Champault A, Smadja C, Franco D. Laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2008 Feb;22(2):372-8. Epub 2007 Aug 18. — View Citation

Ishizawa T, Gumbs AA, Kokudo N, Gayet B. Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):959-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffed3. — View Citation

Lee KF, Chong CN, Wong J, Cheung YS, Wong J, Lai P. Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis. World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6. — View Citation

Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 2):956-8. — View Citation

Slim A, Garancini M, Di Sandro S, Mangoni I, Lauterio A, Giacomoni A, De Carlis L. Laparoscopic versus open liver surgery: a single center analysis of post-operative in-hospital and post-discharge results. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;397(8):1305-11. d — View Citation

Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Vandeweyer H, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms: comparative analysis of short-term results. Surg Endosc. 2008 Oct;22(10):2208-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0023-9. Epub 2008 Jul 12. — View Citation

Tranchart H, Di Giuro G, Lainas P, Roudie J, Agostini H, Franco D, Dagher I. Laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched-pair comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1170-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0745-3. Epub 2009 Nov 14. — View Citation

Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1203-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2705-8. Ep — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in allClick here to view all references

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Overall survival The overall survival of HCC patients after operation 5 years
Secondary Disease free survival The disease free survival of HCC patients after operation 5 years
Secondary Incidence of postoperative complications Incidence of postoperative complications 1 month
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT04209491 - Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
Completed NCT03963206 - Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE) Phase 4
Completed NCT03268499 - TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05263830 - Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
Recruiting NCT05044676 - Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Recruiting NCT05095519 - Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05497531 - Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers N/A
Completed NCT05068193 - A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT03781934 - A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03655613 - APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04242199 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Completed NCT04401800 - Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT05418387 - A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04039607 - A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 3
Terminated NCT03970616 - A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04118114 - Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06239155 - A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT03642561 - Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03222076 - Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer Phase 2