Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation Assisted Hepatectomy and Hepatectomy Alone in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RFA has become a standard method in the treatment of small HCC(≤2 cm) due to its ease of use, safety, cost-effectiveness, and minimal invasiveness. It can ablated and blocked the small vessels while destroyed the tumor cell in situ. Surgical resection is the most widely accepted treatment for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the Asian countries. But the effectiveness of hepatectomy was depressed because of the high recurrence rate. The spreading of the cancer cell along the portal vein or the hepatic vein system during the operation account for the tumor recurrence. Using RFA to ablate and block the small vessels around the tumor before resection will reduce the spreading of the cancer cell. Investigators hypothesized that the RFA assisted hepatectomy might result in lower recurrence rate than hepatectomy alone in the treatment of advanced HCC. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of RFA assisted hepatectomy with hepatectomy alone for the treatment of advanced HCC.
| Status | Recruiting |
| Enrollment | 150 |
| Est. completion date | November 2016 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 2016 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | Both |
| Age group | 18 Years to 70 Years |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Diagnosis of HCC confirmed at our hospital. 2. Intrahepatic tumor count no higher than 3 and a minimum tumor diameter > 3 cm, but no more than 8cm. 3. Liver function of Child-Pugh Class A or B. 4. Tumors lacked intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastasis. 5. Tumors had not invaded the portal vein, the hepatic vein trunk or the secondary branches. 6. Indocyanine green retention at 15 minutes (ICG-15) of <10%. 7. No evidence of coagulopathy: platelet count > 50 × 109/L and a prolonged prothrombin time of < 5 seconds. 8. No other anti-tumor therapy received before the treatment. - Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients met the inclusion criteria but declined to participate. 2. Patients with severe portal hypertension, a history of esophageal variceal hemorrhage, severe hypersplenism syndrome, or refractory ascites. 3. Patients whose permanent pathology after treatment suggested metastatic liver cancer or primary liver cancer of another tissue type. |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Institute of hepatobiliary surgery,Southwest Hospital | Chongqing | Chongqing |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Southwest Hospital, China |
China,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Number of participants with adverse events | 2 years | No | |
| Primary | Recurrence-free Survival | 2 years | No | |
| Secondary | Overall Survival | 2 years | No |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
| Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |