Hepatocellular Carcinoma Clinical Trial
Official title:
Diagnostic Contribution of XENETIX® CT PERFUSION in Pre-therapeutical Assessment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
| Verified date | July 2017 |
| Source | Guerbet |
| Contact | n/a |
| Is FDA regulated | No |
| Health authority | |
| Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to prospectively determine the diagnostic value of Xenetix-CT perfusion for the discrimination between well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and poorly/moderately differentiated HCC, in histo-pathologically proven HCC, and with the aim to cover the entire liver.
| Status | Completed |
| Enrollment | 96 |
| Est. completion date | October 2014 |
| Est. primary completion date | October 2014 |
| Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
| Gender | All |
| Age group | 18 Years and older |
| Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects diagnosed for HCC and planned for surgery (lobectomy or transplantation) within a timeframe of 30 days between first imaging procedure used for the study and surgery. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects who have undergone prior TACE (TransArterial Chemo Embolization), prior RFA (Radio Frequency Ablation) or prior SIRT (Selected Internal Radio Therapy) within one year before inclusion. |
| Country | Name | City | State |
|---|---|---|---|
| Austria | AKH | Vienna | |
| Germany | Universitätsklinikum Erlangen | Erlangen | |
| Korea, Republic of | SMC | Seoul | |
| Korea, Republic of | SNUH | Seoul | |
| Switzerland | Zurich University Hospital | Zurich |
| Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
|---|---|
| Guerbet |
Austria, Germany, Korea, Republic of, Switzerland,
| Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Blood Volume (BV) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Primary | Blood Flow (BF) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Primary | Permeability Surface (PS) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Arterial Liver Perfusion (ALP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Portal Venous Liver Perfusion (PVP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Total Liver Perfusion (TLP) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. TLP = ALP + PVP |
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Hepatic Perfusion Index (HPI) According to Degree of Lesions Differentiation | The mean level of each CT perfusion parameter was compared between well differentiated and moderately/poorly differentiated lesions according to WHO classification evaluated off-site. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase) | Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype. Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category. |
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Blood Volume According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31) | CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase) | Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype. Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category. |
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Blood Flow According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31) | CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (Glutamine Synthetase) | Glutamine synthetase is an immunohistochemistry parameter of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotype. Glutamine synthetase labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of glutamine synthetase labelling, lesions were classified in the "glutamine synthetase 0%" category. |
Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery | |
| Secondary | Permeability Surface According to Immunohistochemistry Parameter (CD31) | CD31 is an immunohistochemistry marker of microvessel density. CD31 labelling was quantified and in case of positive quantification, classified in the following categories: 1-10%, 10-50% and >50%. In case of absence of CD31 labelling, lesions were classified in the "CD31 0%" category. | Within a week from CT perfusion to surgery |
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting |
NCT04209491 -
Interest of the Intervention of a Nurse Coordinator in Complex Care Pathway
|
||
| Completed |
NCT03963206 -
Cabozantinib toLERANCE Study in HepatoCellular Carcinoma (CLERANCE)
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT03268499 -
TACE Emulsion Versus Suspension
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05263830 -
Glypican-3 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated by Immunotherapy
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05044676 -
Immune Cells as a New Biomarker of Response in Patients Treated by Immunotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05095519 -
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Imaging Using PSMA PET/CT
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05497531 -
Pilot Comparing ctDNA IDV vs. SPV Sample in Pts Undergoing Biopsies for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Cancers
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05068193 -
A Clinical Trial to Compare the Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of "BR2008" With "BR2008-1" in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03781934 -
A Study to Evaluate MIV-818 in Patients With Liver Cancer Manifestations
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03655613 -
APL-501 or Nivolumab in Combination With APL-101 in Locally Advanced or Metastatic HCC and RCC
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04242199 -
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04401800 -
Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
| Withdrawn |
NCT05418387 -
A Social Support Intervention to Improve Treatment Among Hispanic Kidney and Liver Cancer Patients in Arizona
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04039607 -
A Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 3 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03970616 -
A Study of Tivozanib in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT06239155 -
A Phase I/II Study of AST-3424 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03642561 -
Evaluation the Treatment Outcome for RFA in Patients With BCLC Stage B HCC in Comparison With TACE
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT03222076 -
Nivolumab With or Without Ipilimumab in Treating Patients With Resectable Liver Cancer
|
Phase 2 |