View clinical trials related to Hepatitis.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to prove the superiority of entecavir over lamivudine for preventing the risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma on CHOP/R-CHOP.
This is a prospective randomized, open-label, phase IV clinical trial to learn the effects, good and/or bad, of discontinuing or continuing nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) treatment for 72 weeks in participants with chronic hepatitis B infection whose immune system is controlling the amount of virus levels in the blood for at least 12 months of NA therapy. About 66 adult men and women will participate in this study from University Health Network which includes the Toronto Western Hospital for about 72 weeks.
Currently, seven medications are approved for the treatment of hepatitis B: two formulations of interferon and five nucleons(t)ide analogues. The current treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B is now standard: initial selection of entecavir, tenofovir, or peginterferon alfa-2a (peg-IFNα-2a). Interferon is administered for a finite duration while nucleotide analogues are usually administered for many years. But among hepatitis B e antigen （HBeAg） positive patients with high serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels, the rates of virological response are poor. And antiviral drug resistance is a major limiting factor to the success of nucleotide analogue treatment. Therefore, combination therapy using peginterferon with an oral agent with a high genetic barrier to resistance might be superior to standard current monotherapy. However, the addition of lamivudine to peg-IFNα-2a therapy led to a greater decrease in serum HBV DNA levels during treatment but did not increase the rate of HBeAg sero¬conversion. Entecavir is a nucleoside analogue superior to lamivudine and adefovir in achieving higher virological response, histological improvement and normalisation of ALT. Moreover, Entecavir has a high genetic barrier with a very low incidence of drug resistance. This study is aimed to investigate the efficacy of combination or sequential therapy using peg-IFNα-2a and entecavir in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients.
A single Center, Prospective Phase IV, Open-Label, Controlled, Randomized Trial comparing the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Quadritherapy regimen (Reiferon Retard® , Ribavirin , Nitazoxanide and Alfacalcidol (Bon-One ® ) versus Triple therapy regimen (Reiferon Retard® , Ribavirin and Nitazoxanide) versus the standard of care regimen(Reiferon Retard® and Ribavirin) in the treatment of Naïve chronic hepatitis C among the Egyptian population. Effectiveness will be evaluated based on Sustained Virological Response (SVR) . PRIMARY OBJECTIVE(S): The primary objectives of this trial are as follows: - To compare the efficacy of the three treatment arms in naïve Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype 4 patients by evaluating the sustained virological response ( SVR) at week 60 ( 3 months after end of treatment period) - Identify optimum treatment protocol for HCV genotype 4 in respect to used combination of medications - Whether adding vitamin D, a potent immunomodulator, could improve viral response. STUDY DESIGN: This is a phase IV, single center, open labeled, randomized (1:1:1) controlled study. NUMBER OF EVALUABLE SUBJECTS: 300 NUMBER OF CENTER/S: 1 Country:Egypt DURATION OF THE STUDY: 94 weeks TREATMENT: randomized 1:1:1 ratio into 3 Arms SUBJECT POPULATION: male or female subjects assessed by BMI less than 35, between the ages of 20 and 50 years. Subjects have to be diagnosed as Naïve Chronic Hepatitis C genotype 4 patients with compensated liver disease assessed by hematological and biochemical tests. - DURATION OF THE STUDY: 94 weeks as follows: Estimated Enrollment Duration: 16 weeks Collection of last Case Report Form (CRF) : 2 weeks from Last patient out. Queries Resolution: 4 weeks from Collection of last CRF. Database lock planned date: 2 weeks from Quires resolution. Final Study Report: 8 weeks from Database lock. Estimated duration of subject participation: 62 weeks as follows; - Screening period per subject = 2 weeks - Treatment phase per subject = 48 weeks - Follow-up phase per subject = 12 weeks N.B : Each patient will receive medications for Maximum 48 weeks if his/her Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) -ve at weeks 12 and 24 , and if his/her PCR +ve at week 12 or week 24 the treatment will be stopped .
The host immunity has been generally recognized as the main factors to determine the outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; however, previous studies have shown that HBV-specific T cell and B cell function are exhausted in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Recently, It is suggested that hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) may play a key role in the immune tolerance or immune exhaustion. Anti-HBV immune responses are partially recovered when patients achieved hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion during antiviral therapy, and can be nearly recovered during HBsAg seroconversion. However, it is still difficult to achieve the ideal terminal, HBsAg seroconversion. For this reason, immunotherapy would be helpful to enhance the anti-HBV immunity and acquire higher HBsAg seroconversion. Here, the investigators propose a hypothesis that hepatitis B immune globin (HBIG)+granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)+HBV vaccine can enhance anti-HBV immune responses and improve HBsAg seroconversion in CHB patients who has achieved HBeAg seroconversion using nucleoside analogues treatment.
Transient elastography is novel non-invasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease, by measuring liver stiffness. Transient elastography is a user friendly technique that can be easily performed at bedside or in outpatient clinic with immediate results and good reproducibility. Liver stiffness values ranges from 2.5 to 75 kPa with lower values <6kPa suggest no fibrosis where as higher values above 14kPa suggests cirrhosis. In the present study the investigators hypothesis that the investigators can differentiate ACLF and acute severe viral hepatitis based on fibroscan as patients with underlying fibrosis with superadded inflammation would have higher fibroscan value than when patient have only inflammation with no underlying fibrosis and hence the investigators can avoid unnecessary test in such subgroup.
Lamivudine had been widely used for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, development of antiviral resistance has been known as the major drawback: Incidence of lamivudine resistance was reported to be approximately 70% after 5 years (Lok AS et al, 2003). For the treatment of lamivudine resistance, adefovir has been widely used (Lok AS and McMahon B, 2009). However, switching to adefovir monotherapy was also reported to be at high risk of resistance, 25% at year 2 (Yeon JE et al, 2006). Recently, adding adefovir on lamivudine was shown to be superior to switching to adefovir monotherapy by decreasing the adefovir resistance (Rapti I et al, 2007, Lampertico P et al, 2007). However, combination of adefovir and lamivudine does not increase antiviral activity compared with adefovir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance (Peters MG et al, 2004). As many patients are still viremic with the treatment of lamivudine and adefovir over 1 year, the investigators need more potent combination of the drugs. Telbivudine is a new nucleoside analogue with potent antiviral activity. The previous phase III study has shown the superiority of telbivudine over lamivudine in HBeAg positive and negative subjects (Lai CL et al, 2007). Therefore, telbivudine plus adefovir may be a better treatment option than lamivudine plus adefovir for the lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. No study assessing the efficacy of telbivudine plus adefovir has been conducted for these patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of telbivudine plus adefovir compared with lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B patients at the end of 1 year follow-up,
The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of prophylactic entecavir in HBsAg Positive lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-based immunochemotherapy.
The linkage between viral hepatitis and renal failure is complex. The current study aims to exlore the long-term prevalence of viral hepatitis among uremic patients in Taiwan
The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of prophylactic entecavir in HBsAg Negative/HBcAb Positive/hepatitis B virus DNA Negative patients with lymphoma.