View clinical trials related to Hepatitis C.
Filter by:This is a proof of concept, single center study for the donation of HCV-positive hearts to HCV negative recipient patients, with preemptive, interventional treatment with 12-16 weeks of grazoprevir and elbasvir (with or without ribavirin) to prevent HCV transmission upon transplantation.
There is only one kind of treatment (simeprevir 150 mg + sofosbuvir 400 mg+daclatasvir 60 mg) in this study but the treatment duration may be different depending on patients' response to the antiviral therapy and whether patients have liver cirrhosis. If patients have no cirrhosis and the HCV viral load on day 2 is <500 IU/ml, patients will receive sofosbuvir, daclatasvir and simeprevir for 3 weeks, otherwise the treatment duration is 4 weeks. If patients have cirrhosis and the HCV viral load on day 2 is <500 IU/ml, patients will receive sofosbuvir, daclatasvir and simeprevir for 6 weeks, otherwise the treatment duration will be 8 weeks.
Pilot, single center, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Grazoprevir and Elbasvir in HCV GT1 and 4 liver transplant recipients.30 liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence.
The purpose of this multicenter, single-arm, combination-drug study, which includes 12 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks of follow-up, is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir in Japanese adults infected with HCV GT1b, who are treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced to an IFN-based regimen and who have ESRD on HD.
Interferon-free Antiviral Treatment of HCV-Positive Genotype 1b Related Indolent non-Hodgkin Lymphomas Patients Using Daclatasvir and Asunaprevir: A Pilot Study
Chronic liver diseases of differing etiologies are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1]. Chronic liver disease progresses through different pathological stages that vary from mild hepatic inflammation without fibrosis to advanced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis [2]. Assessment of the stage of liver disease is important for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up both during treatment and after cessation of treatment. A liver biopsy is the oldest and most accurate method used to evaluate liver histology and the progression of chronic liver disease. Furthermore, different histological scoring systems have been developed and modified [3]. A liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for assessing liver histology [4]. During the pathological progression of liver fibrosis, excessive amounts of extracellular matrix build up; furthermore, serum levels of various biomarkers change, in addition to the appearance of new biomarkers in the serum during the different stages of fibrosis [2, 5]. Recently many noninvasive markers (NIMs) for assessing liver fibrosis have been developed, and they are frequently used in clinical practice. They have been validated in different studies, and some were found to be highly accurate in the assessment of liver fibrosis compared with liver biopsies [6-7], which have always been used as the standard reference method for evaluating the accuracy of noninvasive methods. There are limited studies documenting the cost effectiveness of non invasive markers over invasive technique. Most people with chronic Hepatitis B or C are unaware of their infection, putting them at serious risk of developing cirrhosis or liver cancer which are life threatening. Similarly patients with non alcoholic fatty liver diseases are unaware about fibrosis in liver. About 20-50% of persistent infection ends up into fibrosis and finally cirrhosis. Invasive and non invasive diagnostic methods are widely used to detect the fibrosis. Clinicians use different drugs and combinations to treat HBV and HCV infections. However, there is scarcity of a longitudinal prospective study to assess the cost effectiveness of these diagnostic measures. We planned to conduct a retrospective followed by prospective cohort study among all cases that underwent biopsy in ILBS or GB Pant Hospital since 2000 till Dec 2020 with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease. For retrospective cohort study, we will collect data from hospital information system for all patients with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease, who underwent biopsy during the period of 2000-Dec 2015. The new patients with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease who will undergo biopsy during the period Jan 2016- Dec 2020 will serve as a cohort for prospective design. We will collect socio-demographic data, clinical data, family history, personal history, medical history, anthropometry, biochemical and radiological data from each patient. We will also be conducting a cost effective analysis for various non invasive markers against biopsy as a gold standard in predicting fibrosis, both for retrospective and prospective cohorts. For prospective cohort study, after evaluation of baseline biopsy results, the cases with metavir fibrosis score (F0-3) will be followed for a period of 5 years to document incidence of development and progression of fibrosis. No additional investigation or test will be asked to the patient for the study. We will also develop a predicting model for development and progression of fibrosis.
All patients with chronic kidney disease (stages 3, 4 and 5) and chronic dialysis patients with HCV infection attending nephrology and Hepatology OPD or getting outpatient dialysis at the dialysis unit of ILBS.
The purpose of the study is to determine if combination therapy with daclatasvir (DCV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) for 8 weeks is safe and effective in patients who have never been treated previously without liver cirrhosis who are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-1 Coinfection genotype (GT) 1, 2, 3, 4 patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine if 8 weeks of Daclatasvir plus Sofosbuvir with or without Ribavirin is safe and effective in the treatment of genotype 3 hepatitis C infected patients without advanced fibrosis or liver cirrhosis who have never been treated previously.
Patients with hepatitis C show impaired neutrophil function. It is not known whether this is a direct of an indirect phenomenon. Using bone marrow biopsies from patients with hepatitis C it is possible to see whether neutrophil granulocyte progenitors are already infected with hepatitis C.