View clinical trials related to Hepatitis A.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to investigate the relationships between interleukin 28B genetic variants and the response to treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Chinese children.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of a short course of therapy (24 weeks) versus standard 48 week treatment in previously untreated adult participants with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 4 infection who achieve rapid virologic response (RVR), defined as HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) negativity after 4 weeks of treatment.
This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual and triple therapies based on Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Patients receiving treatment with either Pegasys plus ribavirin or Pegasys plus ribavirin plus telaprevir/boceprevir will be observed for the duration of their treatment and for up to 24 weeks of follow-up.
For HBeAg (+) hepatitis B patients who have been treated by entecavir for 48 weeks but without HBeAg loss, switching to peg-interferon may increase the response rate. In the investigators study, patients were divided into two groups. In Group A, patients continued entecavir for another 72 weeks. In Group B, patients switched to peg-interferon-2a monotherapy for 48 weeks, then followed up 24 weeks.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin therapy in Korean chronic hepatitis C patients.
The goal of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment is complete and permanent eradication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from patient's body, which is best represented by serum HBsAg loss accompanied by undetectable serum HBV DNA level. While the most recently approved nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) have marked antiviral potency and can induce HBV DNA undetectability in the majority of patients through prolonged treatment, NA need to be given long term, almost indefinitely, in most cases because they suppress HBV DNA only during therapy. For example, even after HBeAg-loss by a potent NA, suppression of serum HBV DNA to undetectable level is sustained only in about 23%-37% at 24 weeks off treatment. Thus, continuous therapy with NA until HBsAg clearance remains necessary in a majority of cases. The recent availability of commercial quantitative assays of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has enabled quantitative HBsAg to be used as a biomarker for prognosis and treatment response in CHB. It has been suggested that HBsAg decline during lamivudine or entecavir therapy is slower and less pronounced compared to interferon treatment, despite a higher effect on HBV DNA suppression. Based on HBsAg kinetics, it has been estimated that the predicted median time to HBsAg loss in patients treated with lamivudine or entecavir is more than 30 years. Thus, treatment that can induce rapid decline of HBsAg would have clear advantage in reducing the treatment duration required to achieve HBsAg-loss. Interestingly, in a recent preliminary study, 24-weeks of treatment with telbivudine has induced HBsAg decline as comparable to pegylated interferon treatment. Although there has been no head-to-head trial comparing NAs in inducing HBsAg decline, previous studies consistently suggested that the decline of HBsAg is greater during telbivudine treatment compared with lamivudine or entecavir. Thus, in this clinical trial, the investigators will investigate whether telbivudine is more effective in inducing HBsAg decline compared with entecavir in HBeAg-positive CHB patients who have achieved undetectable serum HBV DNA by preceding entecavir treatment.
In Korea, the number of suboptimal responders to rescue combination therapy is also increasing. As a matter of fact, according to the investigations in Korea, HBV DNA undetectability at 48 weeks of adefovir and lamivudine combination rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine resistance was reported to be only 32.4%, which suggested that the appropriate another rescue therapy might be urgently required. However, there is no promising oral antiviral agents to control these patients in Asia-Pacific region, where tenofovir is not widely available. Tenofovir has a higher potent antiviral efficacy and a negligible drug resistance rate. The switch from adefovir to tenofovir in patients who have insufficient hepatitis B virus (HBV) suppression (HBV DNA ≥ 60 IU/mL by PCR) may lead to increased viral suppression or more HBeAg loss/seroconversion. Here, the investigators aimed to conduct a randomized study on evaluating the antiviral efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching from adefovir to tenofovir in chronic hepatitis B patients who have suboptimal response to adefovir-based combination rescue therapy due to nucleoside analogues Resistance (SATIS study).
Entecavir(ETV) plus Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate(TDF) combination will show effective antiviral activity and prevent further development of antiviral resistance in hepatitis B e antigen(HBeAg)-positive or -negative Chronic Hepatitis B(CHB) patients who experienced multidrug resistance All subjects will orally take investigational drugs once daily for 48 weeks. All subjects will be assessed at baseline, Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48. Evaluations at each visit will include vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests and HBV DNA levels. They were also questioned about adverse events and concomitant medications. At baseline and every six months thereafter, serum will be assayed for HBV serology. Genotypic analysis will be performed at baseline and 48 weeks.
This is a multiple dose study of the safety and efficacy of MK-2748 to be done in 2 Parts. Part I will enroll genotype 1 (GT1) hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected participants and Part II will enroll genotype 3 (GT3) HCV-infected participants. Both Parts may run concurrently or may be staggered.
Patients are being asked to be part of this study because they are a liver transplant recipient and have the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). Current routine treatment for HCV for liver transplant patients includes taking two medications called pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys®) and ribavirin. Patients Pegasys and ribavirin are FDA approved for the treatment of HCV. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding a third drug called telaprevir for the experimental treatment of HCV in liver transplant patients. The combination of Pegasys, ribavirin and telaprevir is currently FDA approved for the treatment of HCV, but is specifically not FDA approved for HCV patients who have had a liver transplant. This is because more information is needed about possible drug interactions between telaprevir and cyclosporine, or telaprevir and tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive drugs, which are typically part of routine care for transplant patients. Studies have shown that the addition of telaprevir greatly increases the efficacy of Pegasys and ribavirin for the treatment of HCV. However, these studies did not include adequate information on transplant patients due to the potential drug interactions. The investigators hope to gather more information about the safety and efficacy of telaprevir given in combination with Pegasys and ribavirin in the liver transplant patients who have HCV that is not well controlled with Pegasys and ribavirin alone.