View clinical trials related to Hepatitis A.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with Daclatasvir/Asunaprevir/BMS-791325, with or without ribavirin, for 8, 6, or 4 weeks is feasible for the treatment of genotype 1a chronic hepatitis C in patients without cirrhosis.
The primary objective of this program is to provide Daclatasvir in combination with Sofosbuvir with or without Ribavirin to subjects with chronic Hepatitis C who are at a high risk of liver decompensation or death within 12 months if left untreated and who have no available therapeutic options.
A randomized, Open label, Single center, Prospective study to compare efficacy and safety of Therapeutic Vaccination with Intensified schedule plus Pegylated Interferon dual Therapy on Seroclearance of Hepatitis B virus Surface Antigen in Patients with Complete Virological Response Induced by Entecavir
This study will explore the relationship of different DEB025 doses in combination with RBV to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic (i.e. viral load reduction) and safety profiles in chronic hepatitis C GT 2 and 3 patients who have previously failed interferon therapy or are intolerant or unable to take interferon
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination treatment with grazoprevir (MK-5172) + elbasvir (MK-8742) for cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic participants with chronic Genotype 1 (GT1) hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The primary study hypothesis is that the proportion of HCV GT1-infected CKD participants within the Immediate Treatment and Intensive Pharmacokinetics (PK) groups achieving a sustained viral response 12 weeks after the end of all study treatment (SVR12) will be >45%.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of two doses of GSK Biologicals' HPV-16/18 L1 VLP AS04 vaccine when co-administered with GSK Biologicals' HAV vaccine according to 0, 6 month schedule, compared to the administration of either of these vaccines alone. The study will ascertain that the immune responses elicited to the two vaccines are not adversely impacted compared to when HPV-16/18 L1 VLP AS04 vaccine and HAV vaccine are administered alone.
This is a 3-part study of Ruzasvir (MK-8408) for participants with hepatitis C infection. Successive participants will be enrolled as dose levels are evaluated to find the maximum safe and well tolerated dose of Ruzasvir. Part I will be for participants with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 (GT3) and will run first: Part II will be for participants with HCV genotype 1a (GT1a), and Part III will be for participants with HCV genotype 2b (GT2b). Parts II and III may run concurrently. The primary study hypothesis is that a safe and tolerable dose of Ruzasvir that reduces viral load will be found to support further clinical investigation.
Purpose: To improve the diagnosis and assessment of severity of acute alcoholic hepatitis Participants: Patients admitted to one of ten centers with acute alcoholic hepatitis Procedures (methods): Consecutive patients admitted with acute alcoholic hepatitis will be enrolled in an NIH U01 study of acute alcoholic hepatitis where liver tissue, blood and stool will be collected to discover and validate factors associated with diagnosis, severity of disease and survival.
It is estimated that 350-400 million people have chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) all over the world. In china, 93 million individuals suffer from this chronic condition. Currently, seven medications are approved for the treatment of hepatitis B: two formulations of interferon and four nucleos(t)ide analogues. The Chinese population has one of the longer average life spans, and the size of the aged population has been increasing rapidly. As a result, the prevalence of elderly patients with HBV has increased, and the potential for development of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in such patients is real. Hence, treatment of elderly patients with HBV is an important issue. However, ADV or ETV has become first choice due to the more side effect of INF and the resistant of LAM and LdT. But treatment outcomes with ADV and ETV in elderly are not known yet. In this study, we will evaluate and compare the efficacy and tolerability of ADV and ETV between younger and older patients with HBV. The aims of the present study are (1)to assess the benefits of ADV or ETV therapy for elderly patients with chronic hepatitis B, and (2)to determine differences in the emergence rate of side effect.
No more than 56% of subjects at the Robley Rex Louisville Veterans Administration Medical Center (VAMC) prescribed boceprevir-based triple therapy, will complete Hepatitis C (HCV) treatment as prescribed. Of patients who did not complete therapy, the primary reasons for discontinuation were side effects (48%) and non-adherence (32%). An intervention is needed to improve the treatment completion rate in subjects so they can achieve the high SVR rates noted in SPRINT-2 and RESPOND-2