View clinical trials related to Hemorrhagic Shock.
Filter by:Adult male patients brought to the emergency department as Level A trauma activations who are receiving emergency blood transfusion. Objectives 1. Evaluate PRBC equivalents transfused in each group in the first 24 hours (Primary outcome) 2. Evaluate total transfusion in each group in the first 24 hours (Secondary Outcome) including breakdown by FFP equivalents, platelet units, and cryoprecipitate 3. Evaluate 6 hour, 24 hour, and hospital mortality (Secondary Outcome) 4. Evaluate ICU outcomes in each group
The effect of early, prehospital norepinephrine use in patients with traumatic shock on mortality is unknown. Recent existing observational evidence from single system data (US, France, Japan) are conflicting. The investigators hypothesize that prehospital norepinephrine is associated with decreased mortality when used in patients with traumatic shock.
Study Design: Single-center, not-randomized, open-label, two-arms controlled pilot clinical trial. Health Condition: Patients with severe trauma with a need for transfusion and categorized as priority 0 or 1 according to the Catalan Health Service (CatSalut) Polytrauma Code (PPT)
It is reported that high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), a non-histone nuclear protein, can serve as an alarmin with damage associated molecular patterns to activate immune responses in the early stages of hemorrhagic shock (HS). However, the origin of HMGB1 and how it is released following HS is poorly understood. In this study, we teased out this mechanism. We try to record the concentration of serum HMGB1 protein following HS in clinical patients.
In this study, we will explore the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial that will compare high protein dose from ICU day 6 to 14 with moderate protein intake.
The LITES Network is an operational trauma center consortium which has the expertise, track record and confirmed capabilities to conduct prospective, multicenter, injury care and outcomes research of relevance to the Department of Defense (DoD). Hemorrhage and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) are responsible for the largest proportion of all trauma-related deaths. It is the poly-trauma patient who suffers both hemorrhagic shock and traumatic brain injury where a paucity of evidence exists to direct treatment, limiting the development of beneficial trauma practice guidelines. The use of Whole Blood (WB) for early trauma resuscitation has been touted as the 'essential next step' in the evolution of trauma resuscitation. Despite its historical and more recent use, little is known regarding WB's benefit relative to the 'current practice' ratio-based blood component therapy in the acutely bleeding patient, and even less is known regarding its effects in patients with TBI. AIM#1: Evaluate patient centered outcomes associated with early whole blood resuscitation practice as compared to component resuscitation in poly-trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock and further characterize outcome benefits in those with traumatic brain injury. AIM#2: Characterize blood pressure and resuscitation endpoints during the acute resuscitation phase of care and the associated/attributable outcomes for traumatic brain injury in patients with hemorrhagic shock. General Hypothesis #1: Whole blood resuscitation will be associated with improved mortality and resuscitation outcomes in poly-trauma patients and long term neurological outcome in those patients with traumatic brain injury as compared to those resuscitated with component therapy. General Hypothesis #2: Differences in prehospital and acute phase resuscitation systolic blood pressure will be associated with differential outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury at discharge and at 6 months. Study Design: The LITES network will perform a multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study over a 4 year period to determine the impact of whole blood resuscitation in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock at risk of large volume resuscitation with and without TBI. Early whole blood resuscitation will be compared to standard component resuscitation. The study will also further characterize blood pressure and resuscitation endpoints in poly-trauma patients with traumatic brain injury. Six Trauma sites with appropriate characteristics will be selected from 12 LITES Network sites across the country. Study Setting: The study will be performed utilizing busy level I trauma centers within the LITES Network located across the country, at sites where either whole blood has currently been incorporated into standard of care or where component blood transfusion is being utilized for patients in hemorrhagic shock at risk for large volume resuscitation. Study Population: The study will focus on patients who suffer blunt or penetrating injury, transported to a SWAT participating LITES trauma center with evidence of hemorrhagic shock at risk of large volume blood resuscitation.
In this study the impact of two CE marked and FDA approved sternal needles in comparison to intravenous access on the flow-rate of autologous reinfusion of whole blood and the possible hemolysis of red cells post-transfusion in a population of healthy military officers is investigated.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the use of RBC, FDP, WB in the treatment of exsanguinating patients by physician-staffed emergency medical services in Norway, with focus on prehospital transfusion complications and safety.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate whether remote ischemic conditioning is a safe and effective intervention to prevent the development of inflammation and coagulopathy in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock.
The purpose of this study is to determine the cutoff point for IVC collapsibility index (by Bedside Ultrasonographic technique) for cases in hypovolemic hemorrhagic shock with CVP measures less than 8 cmH2o.