Clinical Trials Logo

Heart Failure NYHA Class IV clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Heart Failure NYHA Class IV.

Filter by:
  • Withdrawn  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT03947853 Withdrawn - Heart Failure Clinical Trials

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Predictive Value of the Heart Failure Questionnaire (HF-Q) for the Occurrence of Μajor Αdverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in Patients With Symptomatic Heart Failure

THETIS
Start date: October 1, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Cardiac Heart Failure Questionnaire HF-Q) to assess the severity of the symptoms of Heart Failure. In this study, modified and translated, the "four-point" questionnaire by Severo and his associates - Heart Failure Questionnaire HF-Q, is used. The HF-Q Heart Failure Questionnaire consists of four closed questions: the first with four possible answers and the other three questions with the possibility of three simple-choice answers.

NCT ID: NCT03631654 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Heart Failure NYHA Class IV

Ivabradine in Stage D Heart Failure Patients on Chronic Inotropes

Start date: October 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Ivabradine, a selective inhibitor of the If current in the sinoatrial node, provides heart rate reduction and leads to a reduction in heart failure hospitalizations. For this reason, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines provide a class IIa recommendation for ivabradine in stable heart failure patients with LVEF 35% and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-III symptoms who are on a beta blocker at maximum tolerated dose with a resting heart rate of 70 beats per minute or greater. While ivabradine leads to improvement in outcomes in stable NYHA class II-III chronic heart failure patients, its role in class IV, stage D heart failure, and cardiogenic shock is less clear. Ivabradine's effect on acute cardiogenic shock has been evaluated by two recent studies. In the MODIFY trial, a randomized control study evaluating ivabradine in patients with multiorgan dysfunction, the addition of ivabradine did not result in significant heart rate reductions or other positive clinical outcomes. However, a small prospective trial demonstrated a significant decrease in heart rate and NT-proBNP with the addition of ivabradine in patients with acute cardiogenic shock on dobutamine. While few data investigate ivabradine's role in acute cardiogenic shock, it has yet to be studied in heart failure patients on long-term inotropic therapy. Inotropes such as dobutamine and milrinone result in tachycardia and may lead to ventricular arrhythmias. Moreover, patients on chronic inotropes are typically off beta blockers and have few pharmacological options available to help reduce heart rates. Ivabradine may have a role in decreasing heart rate and improving outcomes in patients on chronic inotropes. Given the benefits of ivabradine in stable chronic heart failure patients, we plan to perform a study investigating the role of ivabradine in NYHA Stage D patients on home inotropes. Our primary objective is to analyze changes in two cardiac biomarkers, NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin. Our secondary outcomes include changes in noninvasive echocardiographic hemodynamics, changes in arrhythmia burden, and heart failure symptom modification based on 6-minute walk test results.