Hearing Loss Prevention for Veterans

Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced Clinical Trial

— HLPP  

Official title:

Hearing Loss Prevention for Veterans

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01038336
• Other study ID #: C7214-R
• Secondary ID: 11-14080238305-2
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: December 21, 2009
• Last updated: November 19, 2014
• Start date: May 2011
• Est. completion date: October 2013

Study information

• Verified date: November 2014
• Source: VA Office of Research and Development
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Federal Government
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Hearing loss is the most prevalent service-connected disability in the VA. It causes communication difficulties, which contribute to isolation, frustration and depression. A major cause of hearing loss is from exposure to high levels of sound, and is referred to as Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL). Veterans have inevitably been exposed to high levels of sound during military service, and even though they may not yet have NIHL, their ears have been damaged. Continued noise exposure in civilian life will result in NIHL. However, it can easily be prevented by avoiding noise or using hearing protection. Most people are unaware that noise damages hearing, and even when they are, they do not use hearing protection. In this study we will use a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of two forms of education about NIHL that we have developed for Veterans. One is a computerized program; the other is a Hearing Conservation Brochure

Description:

Hearing loss and tinnitus are the two most prevalent service-connected disabilities in the VA system for Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) Veterans, and Veterans from World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War and during Peacetime. Costs associated with health care utilization, provision of hearing aids, rehabilitation services and reduced productivity for Veterans with hearing loss are substantial, and continue to increase. On a personal level, hearing loss results in communication difficulties, and often contributes to social isolation, frustration and depression. A major cause of hearing impairment is cochlear damage from exposure to high levels of sound. The longer the period of exposure and the more intense the sound pressure level, the greater is the damage that occurs. The damage from noise exposure is cumulative over time, and exacerbates the effects of aging. Veterans, who have been exposed to high levels of sound in the military are therefore highly vulnerable to damage in civilian life, thus they must protect their ears from further noise to avoid hearing loss as they age. Unfortunately, most people are unaware of the damage noise can do to the auditory system, and even when they are aware, few choose to use hearing protection. It is therefore critical to educate Veterans about the dangers of noise exposure and the simple actions that can be taken to protect hearing.

Our long-range goal is to disseminate an effective hearing loss prevention education program that will help to reduce the prevalence and associated costs of noise induced hearing loss in the Veteran population. Ultimately it is our intention to make the program available to all Veterans, military personnel and other members of the public.

We have developed two forms of intervention to educate Veterans about hearing conservation. One is a computerized multimedia interactive program; the other is a printed Hearing Conservation Brochure. Both provide information about hearing, the damage noise can do to the auditory system, the impact hearing loss has on communication, and the use of hearing protection. In this study we will use a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of these two forms of intervention at changing knowledge, attitudes and behaviors toward hearing conservation. Effectiveness will be examined in three ways through assessment of: (1) actual behavioral changes, as evidenced by decreased daily noise exposure as measured with noise dosimetry; (2) reported behavioral changes, as evidenced by decreased daily noise exposure assessed using a real-time log of daily activities and use of hearing protection; and (3) increased knowledge, healthier attitudes and improved intended and actual behavior towards hearing protection, as assessed with a self-report questionnaire. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, immediately following the intervention and six month post-intervention.

There are many challenges facing military personnel as they reintegrate into society after leaving military service. Reducing their risk of acquiring noise induced hearing loss and the associated problems with communication, will help to make this transition less difficult and traumatic. This study will provide important information about the relative effectiveness of two different forms of hearing conservation education. In the long term it has the potential to reduce the prevalence and associated costs of hearing loss and tinnitus among Veterans, and will demonstrate that prevention of hearing loss can reduce the need for long-term rehabilitation.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 129
• Est. completion date: October 2013
• Est. primary completion date: June 2013
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 55 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

To be included in the study all participants will:

• be aged 55 years or less with no exclusions based on ethnicity or gender. The maximum age of 55 years has been selected because hearing conservation programs have the potential to be most effective for younger individuals.

• not use hearing aids

• have cognitive abilities sufficient to participate in the study, as determined by an age/and educationally appropriate score on the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE).

• ability to read and comprehend the study interventions (HLPP and Hearing conservation brochure) as reflected by a Broad Reading Score of Grade 5 or above on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement Letter-Word Identification, Reading Fluency and Passage Comprehension subtests.

• no known neurological, psychiatric or physical disorders, or co-morbid diseases that would prevent completion of the study as determined by chart review.

• adequate vision to participate in the study as determined with the Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance (SKILL) Card. Participants will be required to have best corrected vision of 20/63 (mild vision loss) or better.

• openness to using a wearable noise dosimeter and to logging daily activities using a personal digital assistant for three periods of seven days each, as determined by agreement to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals will not participate in the study if:

• they are age >55 years.

• wear hearing aids

• score less than the age- and educational-based norms on the MMSE.

• have a Broad Reading score on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement of less than Grade 5.

• have neurological, psychiatric or physical disorders, or co-morbid diseases that would prevent completion of the study.

• have corrected vision poorer than a Snellen equivalent of 20/63.

• be unwilling to use a wearable noise dosimeter and to logging daily activities using a personal digital assistant for three periods of seven days each.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Subject), Primary Purpose: Prevention

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Deafness
• Hearing Loss
• Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Multimedia Hearing Loss Prevention Program
Interactive, multimedia, computer-based HLPP that provides hands-on education and training about hearing loss, tinnitus, hearing protection, and general hearing health care for Veterans.
• Hearing Conservation Brochure
Hearing Conservation brochure provides knowledge-based information similar to that of the multimedia HLPP, but in written form.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	VA Medical Center, Portland	Portland	Oregon

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
VA Office of Research and Development

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (3)

Folmer RL, Saunders GH, Dann SM, Griest SE, Porsov E, Fausti SA, Leek MR. Guest editorial: Computer-based hearing loss prevention education program for Veterans and military personnel. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):vii-xvi. — View Citation

Saunders GH, Dann SM, Griest SE, Frederick MT. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors towards hearing loss prevention. Int J Audiol. 2014 Apr;53(4):209-18. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.860487. Epub 2014 J — View Citation

Saunders GH, Griest SE. Hearing loss in veterans and the need for hearing loss prevention programs. Noise Health. 2009 Jan-Mar;11(42):14-21. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Percentage of Time Spent at Sound Levels >80 Decibels	Objective measure of noise exposure using dosimeter to measure the percentage of time over 7days spent in sound levels >80 decibels	1 month	No
Secondary	Knowledge About Hearing Conservation Scale	Knowledge about hearing conservation was assessed with 16 items in the the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). It is a validated questionnaire that assesses knowledge about and attitudes toward hearing and hearing loss prevention. The Knowledge scale is scored as a percent correct, with a higher score indicating more knowledge. Data presented are for change in knowledge between baseline and 1-month follow-up computed such that a higher score indicates greater increase in knowledge.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Perceived Susceptibility Score	Perceived Susceptibility is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as an individual's assessment of the risk of acquiring a condition. In the current study it assesses the extent to which the individual feels vulnerable to hearing loss. Perceived Susceptibility was assessed with 5 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating greater perceived susceptibility, which according to the Health Belief Model will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Perceived Susceptibility was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating greater perceived susceptibility at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Perceived Severity Score	Perceived Severity is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as an individual's assessment of the seriousness of the consequences of a condition if it is acquired. In the current study it assesses the extent to which the individual believes that a hearing loss would have negative consequences. Perceived Severity was assessed with 3 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating greater perceived severity, which according to the Health Belief Model, will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Perceived Severity was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating greater perceived severity at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Perceived Benefit Score	Perceived Benefit is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as an individual's assessment of the positive consequences of adopting a health behavior. In the present study that is the belief that hearing well is important. Perceived Benefit was assessed with 7 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating greater perceived benefit, which according to the Health Belief Model will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Perceived benefit was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating greater perceived benefit at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Perceived Barriers Score	Perceived Barriers is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as an individual's assessment of the influences that discourage adoption of a health behavior. In the current study it assesses the extent to which the individual perceives few negative influences to protecting hearing. Perceived Barriers was assessed with 3 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating fewer perceived barriers, which according to the Health Belief Model will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Perceived Barriers was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating fewer perceived barriers at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Perceived Self-efficacy Score	Perceived Self-efficacy is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as an individual's assessment of his/her ability to successfully adopt a health behavior. In the current study it assesses the extent to which the individual believes that he/she has the knowledge and abilities to protect hearing. Perceived Self-efficacy was assessed with 4 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating greater perceived self-efficacy, which according to the Health Belief Model, will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Perceived Self-efficacy was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating greater perceived self-efficacy at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No
Secondary	Change in Cues to Action Score	Cues to action is a construct from the Health Belief Model defined as external influences that promote a health behavior (e.g. symptoms, media communications, or information from a healthcare provider). In the current study it refers to prompts from others about protecting hearing. Cues to action was assessed with 2 items in the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Questionnaire (KAB; Saunders et al., 2014). Scores for each item are averaged and transformed onto a scale ranging from -50 to +50, with a higher score indicating greater cues to action, which according to the Health Belief Model will increase an individual's likelihood of engaging in a health behavior. Change in Cues to action was computed as the difference between baseline and 1-month follow-up scores, with a higher score indicating more Cues to action having been received at follow-up.	Baseline and 1 month	No