Health Behavior Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Efficacy of Promoting Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Among Chinese Men Who Have Sex With Men
Objectives:
To evaluate efficacies of two online and theory-based interventions [HC: health communication
only and HC-MI health communication plus motivational interviewing (MI)] in increasing uptake
of three doses of HPV vaccines within the 9-month follow-up period among Hong Kong Chinese
men who have sex with men (MSM).
Hypothesis:
The HPV vaccination rate of the three groups would be in the order HC-MI group > HC group >
Control group.
Design and subjects:
A three-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted (n= 624). With informed
consent, anonymous surveys will be conducted at baseline, Months 3, 6, and 9. Inclusion
criteria: 1) HK Chinese men aged >18, 2) oral or anal intercourse with men in the last six
months; 3) no intention to leave HK for one month consecutively within the next 12 months, 4)
regular internet access, and 5) willing to be followed up by phone.
Study instruments:
Structured questionnaires
Interventions:
1) Group HC: exposure to web-based, interactive and theory-based health communication
promoting HPV vaccination uptake; 2) Group HC-MI: same exposure as Group HC plus MI; and 3)
Group C: exposure to online materials about mental health (control group).
Main outcome measures:
Uptake of three doses of HPV vaccination within the follow-up period.
Data analysis and expected results:
Intention-to-treat analysis, General Estimation Equation (GEE) and Cox regression methods
will be used. Significance differences in HPV vaccination uptake rates will be found among
the three groups.
Aims and objectives
1. The primary objective of the RCT study is to evaluate the relative efficacies of two
online, theory-based and interactive interventions [health communication (HC) and health
communication plus MI (HC-MI)] in increasing uptake of three required doses of HPV
vaccination within a 9-month follow-up period among Hong Kong Chinese MSM who had not
previously taken up any dose of HPV vaccination, as compared to the control group (Group
C)
2. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the relative efficacies of the interventions in
increasing the following responses at the end of the 9-month follow up period:
i) Intention to take up all doses of HPV vaccination in the next 12 months. ii)
Theory-based cognitions supportive of HPV vaccination [e.g. those of the Health Belief
Model (HBM)].
Study design A three-arm parallel RCT will be conducted. Background information and
potential confounder(s) are recorded at baseline. Three post-intervention evaluations
will be performed through short telephone surveys 3, 6 and 9 months after exposure to
the intervention. Participants who have already taken up all three doses of HPV
vaccination at Month 3 or 6 will be asked the termination questionnaire (same as that
for Month 9). Interviewers and data analysts are blinded from participants'
randomization status.
Subject Inclusion criteria: 1) Hong Kong Chinese speaking men of aged ≥18, 2)
self-reported oral or anal intercourse with ≥1 man (last six months); 3) no intention to
leave Hong Kong for >1 month consecutively within the next nine months, 4) regular
internet access and 5) willing to be followed up by phone. Those who have ever received
HPV vaccination will be excluded.
Recruitment procedures Participants will be recruited by outreaching in local
gay-friendly venues. The fieldworkers will explain the study's detail to participants.
Verbal instead of written informed consent will be obtained due to the need to maintain
anonymity; the fieldworkers will sign a form pledging that participants have been fully
briefed and participants' verbal informed consent was obtained. Fieldworkers obtain
multiple contacts (mobile, email and/or other e-contact) from prospective participants.
Participants will also be recruited via the Internet by comparable procedures.
Ethical considerations Fieldworkers guarantee anonymity, the right to quit at any time
and that refusal will not affect participants' chance in using any services. Verbal
instead of written informed consent will be obtained due to the need to maintain
anonymity; the fieldworkers will sign a form pledging that participants have been fully
briefed. In addition, all participants will reconfirm informed consent online before
receiving the online intervention; if the participants select "refuse" for the online
informed consent form, the program will close automatically. Ethics approval was
obtained from the Survey and Behavioral Research Ethics Committee of the CUHK and the
Joint CUHK-NTEC Clinical Research Ethics Committee. All information will be kept in
locked areas.
Randomization In the pre-arranged phone call, fieldworkers brief prospective
participants again and reconfirm participants' informed consent. Participants are
randomly allocated into one of the three groups, with a sealed opaque envelop drawn by
the research staff. Computerized random numbers and block randomization (block size of
12) will be used.
Primary and secondary outcomes The primary outcome of the study is whether the
participant has taken up all three doses of HPV vaccination (at any clinic) within a
9-months follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include intention to take up all three
doses of HPV vaccination in the next 12 months and changes in HBM-related cognitions on
HPV.
The baseline survey After randomization takes place, the fieldworker will administer a
baseline telephone survey to record information on potential confounders (Questionnaire
A: 10-15 minutes).
Evaluation surveys at Months 3, 6 and 9 A short interim phone interview will be
administered at Month 3 and 6 to those who have not taken up three doses of HPV
vaccination at Months 3 and 6 (non-termination) after exposure to intervention,
recording only uptake of HPV vaccination (one dose or two doses, price, venue and date)
during the inter-survey intervals and intention to take up three doses of vaccination in
the next 12 months (Questionnaire B, <5 minutes). Participants present at Month 9 or
having taken up all three dose at Month 3 and 6 (termination) will be asked about HPV
vaccination history, as well as cognitive perceptions and emotional factors included in
the baseline survey (Questionnaire C, about 10 minutes). To reduce loss-to-follow-up,
the investigators will show these questionnaires to the participants at baseline.
Information for validating vaccine uptake All participants, including those who are
vaccinated at the collaborating clinic, will be requested to send the research team an
image of the receipt, hiding personal identification and via the same smartphone number,
social media account, or email previous used in this project, after participants have
taken up each dose of HPV vaccines.
Intervention of the Group HC (Online Health Communication Only Group) Participants will
watch two short health promotion videos (five minutes each), which contain health
communication messages about HPV and HPV vaccination and complete a self-administered
exercise which attempts to increase related knowledge and supportive cognitions. After
completing the tutorials, participants will be requested to answer an online
questionnaire that contains only three simple questions asking about some details of the
two videos. This is to verify exposure to the videos. One's login time for the tutorial
will be recorded by the computer program (another way to cross-check exposure).
Intervention of the Group HC-MI (Online Health Communication Plus MI Group) In addition
to the components received by the Group HC, Group HC-MI will receive motivational
interviewing (MI) of 15 minutes. To increase involvement of the interviewer and rapport,
the interviewer will "wait for" the participants while the participants are performing
the tutorial. [The interviewer will hold (via third line holding) or hang up the phone
while the participant is doing the tutorial and call back 20 minutes afterwards]. The
interviewer will discuss briefly about the tutorial (e.g. participants' responses or
questions) with the participants to enhance support and also to verify exposure to the
tutorial. The interviewer will then conduct a 15-minute MI session with the participant
over phone.
Maintenance of motivation for Group HC and Group HC-MI In order to maintain motivation
formed during the intervention, tailored reminders will be sent by Whatsapp or emails to
all participants of the Group HC and Group HC-MI. A link to the project webpage will be
included in such reminders, prompting participants to access a webpage where
participants can watch a testimonial video about HPV experience presented by a peer MSM,
read comments made by other participants, add participants' own comments and feedback on
others' comments. Such arrangements will provide continuous cues to action for
maintaining motivation. The number of reminders will be standardized to five (at month
1, 2, 4, 6 & 8). The number of reminders sending to participants who have taken up all
three doses of HPV vaccination will be recorded.
The control group (Group C) The health communication messages in Group C will consist of
online messages about prevalence of some common mental health problems among MSM and
introduction of stress reduction exercises. No reminder will be given.
Sample size planning For planning purpose, the investigators conservatively assume 30%
of the automated health communication intervention (Group HC) would show an intention,
and 40% of those with such an intention would actually take up HPV vaccination (i.e. 12%
of Group HC). Regarding the Group HC-MI, the investigators assume the intention would
increase to 60% as MI is a powerful tool; the investigators assume that 50% of its
members with an intention would actually take up the vaccine (hence 30% of Group HC-MI
would be vaccinated). A sample size of 113 per group is needed to achieve the planned
effect sizes and power of .8 and alpha of .0125 for all comparisons (taking into account
multiple comparisons). With an expected loss-to-follow up rate of 35% at month 9, a
sample size of about 174 per group is required (total n=522). To be conservative, the
investigators keep the target sample size of 208 per group (624 in total); which can
detect smallest between-group difference of 16.2% between Group HC (12%) and Group HC-MI
(~28.2%), and detect smallest between-group difference of 10% between Group HC (12%) and
Group C (~2%), at power of .8 and alpha of .0125 (taking into account multiple
comparisons).
Data processing and analysis Test-retest reliability of the baseline questionnaire will
be assessed. For categorical responses, Cohen's Kappa statistics will be tested, while
for continuous responses, intra-class correlation coefficient will be used. Chi-square
test or one-way ANOVA will be conducted to compare differences in background
characteristics of those being followed up and loss to follow-up, and differences in
potential confounders recorded at baseline among the three groups.
Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed to assess relative efficacy of the two
interventions Generalized Estimation Equation (GEE) models will be fit to investigate
significance of differences in primary and secondary outcomes across the three groups,
adjusted for any significant potential confounders. Absolute and relative risk
reductions and corresponding 95% CI will be derived. Cox regression analysis will also
be performed, treating those who are loss to follow-up during the follow-up period and
those who had not taken up all three doses of HPV vaccination at the end of the 9-month
follow-up period as censored cases, and completion of all three doses of HPV vaccination
as the event (endpoint), and intervention group membership as the covariate. Adjustment
for potential confounders (found to be significant at baseline analysis) will be
performed if necessary.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT05009251 -
Using Explainable AI Risk Predictions to Nudge Influenza Vaccine Uptake
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT04356924 -
Psychological Treatment to Support the Consequences of Cognitive Impairment
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05509049 -
Precision Nudging Drives Wellness Visit Attendance at Scale
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03904992 -
Intervention With a Progressive Web App for the Promotion of Healthy Habits in Preschoolers
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05509270 -
Efficacy of Communication Modalities for Promoting Flu Shots
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03167372 -
Pilot Comparison of N-of-1 Trials of Light Therapy
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03081520 -
Affective Responses Following Aerobic Exercise With Different Intensities
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05012163 -
Lottery Incentive Nudges to Increase Influenza Vaccinations
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03982095 -
Survey on Lifestyle, Perceived Barriers and Development of Change in Patients With Prostate Cancer
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06467058 -
Convergent Validity of DABQ Questionnaire
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02996864 -
Location-based Smartphone Technology to Guide College Students Healthy Choices Ph II
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02777086 -
Sustainable HIV Risk Reduction Strategies for Probationers
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06071130 -
Emotion, Aging, and Decision Making
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04152824 -
Readiness Supportive Leadership Training
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05541653 -
The IGNITE Study on Concentrated Investment in Black Neighborhoods
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03875768 -
Nourish: A Digital Health Program to Promote the DASH Eating Plan Among Adults With High Blood Pressure
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04089020 -
Walking to School Supports
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03646903 -
Reducing Help-Seeking Stigma in Young Adults at Elevated Suicide Risk
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03548077 -
POWERPLAY: Promoting Men's Health at Work
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT05249465 -
Spark: Finding the Optimal Tracking Strategy for Weight Loss in a Digital Health Intervention
|
N/A |