Clinical Trials Logo

Headache clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Headache.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02362828 Completed - Clinical trials for Post-Dural Puncture Headache

EPiMAP Obstetrics: European Practices in the Management of Accidental Dural Puncture in Obstetrics

EPiMAP
Start date: January 2016
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aims of EPiMAP Obstetrics are: - to identify risk factors for failure of epidural blood patch in the obstetric population for management of post dural puncture headache. - to describe European practices in the management of accidental dural puncture in the Obstetric population.

NCT ID: NCT02358681 Completed - Migraine Clinical Trials

Intranasal Ketorolac Versus Intravenous Ketorolac for Treatment of Migraine Headaches in Children

Start date: June 16, 2015
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Ketorolac is an evidence-based, first-line acute migraine therapy that is commonly used in the pediatric population; however, it is typically administered by the intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) routes, both of which require a painful and distressing needle stick to administer. The intranasal (IN) route is a painless and effective way of administering analgesics, including ketorolac: IN ketorolac has been shown to be an effective analgesic in adults for painful conditions, including acute migraine headaches. However, IN ketorolac has been understudied in children, and it is not known how effective it is compared to IV ketorolac, which is currently the most common way of administering ketorolac to children. If IN ketorolac is shown to be no less effective than IV ketorolac, IN ketorolac may be a viable and painless alternative to effectively treat acute migraine headaches in children. Therefore, our primary aim is to demonstrate that IN ketorolac is non-inferior to IV ketorolac for reducing pain in children with acute migraine headaches.

NCT ID: NCT02357381 Completed - Headache Clinical Trials

eNeura SpringTMS Post-Market Observational US Study of Migraine

ESPOUSE
Start date: December 1, 2014
Phase:
Study type: Observational

A multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, single arm, open label, post-market, observational study to evaluate the use of the eneura, springtms system in reduction of migraine headache symptoms.

NCT ID: NCT02351544 Completed - Migraine Headaches Clinical Trials

Prospective, Multi-Center Evaluation of the Efficacy of Peripheral Trigger Decompression Surgery for Migraine Headaches

Start date: September 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

According to the peripheral trigger theory of migraine headaches, nociceptive inputs from irritated or compressed cranial nerve branches can lead to neurovascular changes in the brain that cause migraine headaches. Advanced treatments aimed at deactivating the peripheral trigger points can be administered to patients who have failed medical management of migraines. Those accepted advanced treatments include botulinum toxin A injection in order to temporarily paralyze muscles causing nerve compression, and surgery to release those compression points permanently. An advantage of surgery is the ability to release non-muscular causes of nerve compression, such as fascial bands or intersecting arteries. Botulinum toxin A injection into trigger sites has been shown in multiple studies to be effective at reducing the frequency and severity of migraine headaches, and is a very commonly administered treatment for refractory migraines. It is approved by the FDA for the treatment of chronic migraines. Similarly, surgical decompression of trigger sites has previously been shown to have superior clinical outcomes to medical management, through a randomized, blinded controlled-trial performed at Case Western Reserve in 2009. Patients either received actual decompression of the trigger sites, or sham surgery (exposure and visualization of the trigger sites, without decompression). At one-year follow-up, the group who underwent actual surgery demonstrated a statistically higher proportion with significant improvement in their migraines (83.7% vs. 57.7%, p=0.014), and with complete elimination of their migraines (57.1% vs. 3.8%, p<0.001). Several other reports have confirmed the good clinical outcomes of surgery demonstrated in this trial, and surgical decompression is now commonly performed by several surgeons around the United States. Prognostic factors predicting the success of surgical decompression in migraine headache treatment include older age of migraine onset, visual symptoms/aura, and 4-site decompression. Factors predicting failure of surgery include excessive operative blood loss, and surgery on only one or two trigger sites. One criticism of the studies on peripheral trigger decompression surgery for migraines has been that most of the results have originated from the same institution (Case Western Reserve), and from the same author (Guyuron). While several studies at other institutions have demonstrated positive outcomes of peripheral trigger decompression, these have only included a small number of patients. In addition, the sham surgery randomized-controlled trial has been criticized for not clarifying any prior treatments that patients had undergone before peripheral trigger deactivation, and for not showing how medication use patterns changed after surgery. Another criticism of that study was the fact that patients were examined by neurologists before the study but not after the study, and that surgery was performed on some patients with episodic migraines, who are known to not benefit from botulinum toxin. It is unclear what migraine types are most likely to benefit from surgical decompression. The investigators' goal is to perform a multi-center, prospective trial to demonstrate the effectiveness of peripheral trigger decompression in the treatment of migraine headaches, which would address the criticisms mentioned above. The main aim is to demonstrate that the positive results demonstrated by Guyuron et al are reproducible at other institutions and by other surgeons using similar techniques on different patient populations.

NCT ID: NCT02347878 Not yet recruiting - Lymphoma Clinical Trials

Self-control Trial to Evaluate the Role of Aprepitant in the Prophylaxis of Post-lumbar-punture-headache (PLPH)

Start date: April 2015
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Headache following a lumbar puncture (post-lumbar-puncture headache,PLPH)is a common and often debilitating syndrome, which was reported to occur in about 40% patients who received lumbar puncture. Now there lacks of effective approaches in the prophylaxis of PLPH, although some physicians consider bed rest for at least 6 hours to be a useful methods (Some recent meta-analysis found no benefit of bed rest for any hours in the prevention of PLPH). Studies have found that P substances and its receptor (Neurokinin-1 receptor, NK-1R)have played an important role in the pathogenesis of PLPH. Thus, we hypothesize that use of NK-1R inhibitor (aprepitant) 1 hour before lumbar puncture may decrease the incidence of PLPH and lower the severity of PLPH.

NCT ID: NCT02330809 Withdrawn - Headache Clinical Trials

Drinking Extra Water for to Prevent or Decrease Headaches

Start date: February 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to find out if drinking extra water helps people prevent or relieve headaches and hunger and, if so, what volume of water is most effective and when is it best to drink it?

NCT ID: NCT02330094 Completed - Clinical trials for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Gabapentin for Headache in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Start date: December 2014
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to see how much gabapentin will reduce headaches associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to reduce the amount of narcotic pain medication prescribed.

NCT ID: NCT02315833 Completed - Migraine Clinical Trials

The Efficacy of L-cysteine in Prevention of Headache Attacks in Migraine Patients

Start date: December 17, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to validate the novel hypothesis that daily use of L-cysteine (Acetium® capsules) is an effective means to decrease the frequency of (or completely abort) the headache attacks in migraine patients.

NCT ID: NCT02310828 Completed - Cluster Headache Clinical Trials

The Efficacy of L-cysteine in Prevention of Cluster Headache

Start date: December 17, 2013
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to validate the novel hypothesis that daily use of L-cysteine (Acetium® capsules) is an effective means to decrease the frequency of (or completely abort) the attacks of cluster headache.

NCT ID: NCT02309775 Completed - Clinical trials for Tension-Type Headache

Auriculotherapy in Tension-type Headache Due to Temporomandibular Dysfunction

Start date: January 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objectives: Verify the effect of auriculotherapy in patients with tension-type headache resulting from temporomandibular dysfunction. Design: Randomized clinical study Setting: Randomized Study Participants: The study consist of 38 participants randomized into two groups: an intervention group (n = 18, sample loss = 1) and placebo group (n = 20, sample loss = 6) Interventions: The intervention group will receive treatment with auricular acupuncture in the Shen Men, Kidney, Sympathetic, Subcortex, Adrenal and Cerebral points. The placebo group will receive auriculotherapy in the trachea point. Main outcome measures: visual analog scale for pain pain (VAS) and surface electromyography (EMG).