Hand-foot Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Double-Blind Phase III Study of Pyridoxine vs Placebo for the Prevention of Capecitabine-induced Hand-Foot Syndrome
Although pyridoxine has been used empirically for the prevention of capecitabine associated hand-foot syndrome (HFS), its efficacy needs to be demonstrated in prospective controlled trials. The investigators therefore performed a prospective randomized double-blind study to determine whether pyridoxine 200 mg/day can prevent the development of HFS when given concurrently with capecitabine. The investigators also tested the ability of pyridoxine to treat primary occurrence of grade 2-3 HFS.
Although pyridoxine has been used empirically for the prevention of capecitabine associated HFS, its efficacy needs to be demonstrated in prospective controlled trials. We estimated that the HFS rate with placebo and pyridoxine would be 0.35 and 0.18, respectively, and we therefore calculated that a sample size of 345 patients would be necessary to detect these hazard rates with an 80% power (β=0.2) and two-sided significance level of α=0.05. We assumed a follow up loss rate of 10%, thus requiring 380 patients to be randomized. Chemotherapy-naive patients with gastrointestinal tract cancers who were scheduled for capecitabine-containing chemotherapy were assigned to receive oral pyridoxine or placebo in randomized double-blind placebo controlled study. Pyridoxine 100 mg b.i.d was prescribed to the patients in the pyridoxine group, identical placebo 100 mg b.i.d was prescribed in the placebo group by the closed envelop randomization. Patients were stratified by chemotherapy regimen: capecitabine alone (X), capecitabine and cisplatin (XP), or docetaxel, capecitabine, and cisplatin (DXP). Patients were observed until NCI CTC grade 2 or 3 HFS developed or capecitabine-containing chemotherapy ended. Patients in the placebo group who developed grade 2 or 3 HFS were randomized to receive pyridoxine or placebo for the next chemotherapy cycle to determine whether pyridoxine could improve HFS, and the same treatment was continued for 2 chemotherapy cycles. ;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Prevention
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04592731 -
Acetylated Natural Nucleotides in Treating Hand-foot Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05755646 -
Ice Plant Intensive Cream for the Prevention of Hand-Foot Syndrome in Breast Cancer: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01609166 -
Effectiveness Allopurinol Topical Agent Prevention Capecitabine-induced Hand-foot Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Terminated |
NCT03173365 -
The Effect of Topical Brimonidine Tartrate on Hand-foot Syndrome (HFS) in Cancer Patients
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04979078 -
Photobiomodulation Therapy in the Management of Hand-foot Syndrome and Hand-foot Skin Reaction
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05165069 -
The Efficacy and Safety of Mecobalamin in the Prevention of Capecitabine Induced Hand Foot Syndrome
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05348278 -
Urea Cream Prevention for Capecitabine Associated Hand Foot Syndrome
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04833998 -
Hydration Based on Thoitaine, Aloe Vera and Calendula, in the Prevention of Hand-Foot Syndrome in Patients Using Capecitabine
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05949307 -
The Efficacy of Acupuncture and Laser Acupuncture in Treating Chemotherapy or Target Therapy-induced Hand-foot Syndrome
|
N/A |