Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01265719
Other study ID # A6111143
Secondary ID PFI-LAT-2009-01L
Status Completed
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date December 2010
Est. completion date February 2016

Study information

Verified date February 2018
Source Pfizer
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a non-interventional, prospective, longitudinal cohort study. A total of 150 pediatric subjects with glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure, including 75 latanoprost-treated subjects and 75 non-topical prostaglandin analogue treated subjects, will be enrolled from ophthalmic hospital clinics and academic ophthalmic centers. As a non-interventional study, the study subjects' continued use of latanoprost and assessments of ocular events will be obtained through the routine medical follow-up with treating ophthalmologists or other designated members of the medical care team.


Description:

At least 40 subjects in each of the following age groups: 1-<5 years and 5-<18 years. No minimum required numbers in the <1 year age group.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 175
Est. completion date February 2016
Est. primary completion date February 2016
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group N/A to 17 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female <18 years of age (neonates must be at least 36 weeks gestational age). - Diagnosis of pediatric glaucoma or elevated intraocular pressure. - Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject (and/or a legally acceptable representative) has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. A signed and dated assent will be required where applicable according to local laws. For treated subjects only: - Continuously treated with latanoprost for at least 1 month within the year prior to the baseline examination. For untreated subjects only: - Continuously treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month prior to the baseline examination (based on the best knowledge of treating ophthalmologists), and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period; OR - No prior treatment with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues, and unlikely to be treated with latanoprost or other topical prostaglandin analogues during the three-year study period. Exclusion Criteria: - Unable/unwilling to comply with protocol. - Pregnant or nursing females at baseline. - For treated subjects only: a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients contained in latanoprost (e.g., hypersensitivity to benzalkonium chloride).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Other:
No intervention other than routine medical care
Subjects continuously treated with Latanoprost for at least one month Latanoprost treatment during the study period.
No intervention other than routine medical care
Subjects not treated with any topical prostaglandin analogues or continuously treated with topical prostaglandin analogues for less than one month before the baseline examination, and unlikely to be treated with topical prostaglandin analogues during the study period.

Locations

Country Name City State
Belgium Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen, Dienst Oftalmologie Edegem
Belgium Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven - Campus Sint-Raphaël Leuven
Colombia Clinica de Oftalmologia San Diego Medellin Antioquia
Czechia Fakultni nemocnice Brno Brno
Czechia Fakultni nemocnice v Motole Praha 5
Denmark Rigshospitalet - Glostrup Glostrup
France CHU d'Amiens -Centre Saint Victor Amiens
France Hopital Claude Huriez Lille Cedex
France Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild Paris Cedex 19
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Giessen und Marburg Giessen
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf Hamburg
Germany Universitaetsklinikum Mainz Mainz
Greece University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA Thessaloniki
Italy Azienda Ospedaliero Univ. Catania CT
Italy Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu Fiumicino (Roma)
Italy Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Divisione di Oculistica Genova
Italy Unita' Operativa di Oculistica Pediatrica, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguarda Ca'Grande Milano
Peru Óptima Visión Miraflores Lima
Portugal AIBILI - Associação para a Investigação Biomédica e Inovação em Luz e Imagem Coimbra
Slovakia Detska Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou Bratislava Bratislava
Spain Hospital Sant Joan de Deu Esplugues de Llobregat Barcelona
Spain Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid
Spain Hospital Virgen Del Rocio Sevilla
Spain Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet Zaragoza
Sweden Akademiska Sjukhuset Uppsala
Sweden Ögonkliniken, Centrallasarettet Västerås
United Kingdom Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Consultant Ophthalmologist Birmingham
United Kingdom Richard Desmond Childrens Eye Centre London
United Kingdom Manchester Royal Eye Hospital Manchester Gt Man

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

Belgium,  Colombia,  Czechia,  Denmark,  France,  Germany,  Greece,  Italy,  Peru,  Portugal,  Slovakia,  Spain,  Sweden,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) (Snellen or Equivalent) Patients familiar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using Snellen visual acuity. Patients who were unable or unfamiliar with the letters of the alphabet were evaluated using charts made up of numbers, pictures (eg, Schering's Children's Eye Chart or Allen Cards), E's, or Landolt's broken rings, and other methods which were equivalent to Snellen acuity eg, HOTV testing). Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Change in Refractive Error The refractive error [cycloplegic where appropriate (eg, those unable to cooperate with manifest refraction)] were determined at the baseline visit and assessed at the following visits. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Horizontal Corneal Diameter (by Caliper and/or Ruler) The horizontal corneal diameter was measured along the horizontal meridians. Diameter was measured using either a series of transparent plates with holes of different diameters in quarter-millimeter increments or with calibrated calipers compared against a ruler. When using calipers, the corneal diameter measurement was taken from limbus to a similar point 180° away at the opposite limbus. When not examining the children with anesthesia, it was recommended to use a tape measure across the head while measuring horizontal corneal diameter by photographic method. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) IOP was preferably measured using 1 of 3 applanation-contact methods: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Perkins tonometry, or TonoPen® (tonometry). iCare® rebound tonometer was also allowed if it was used consistently throughout the study. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Cup-to-disc Ratio (for Assessment of Optic Nerve Changes/Structures) - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration in Cup/Disc Ratios The cup/disc ratio was recorded horizontally and vertically for each examination, and reported in 0.1 increments. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Visual Field Defects - Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Deterioration of Visual Field Defects. A visual field examination was performed for those patients who can cooperate automated perimetry utilizing a threshold program. All visual fields was conducted utilizing the standard white background with a Goldmann size III white stimulus. For those patients who can not perform formal visual field testing, then field to confrontation test was used for younger, non-verbal children, central, steady and maintains fixation was used. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Iris Color Darkening Changes from baseline in iris color were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Localized Pigmentation (Nevi or Freckles) of Conjunctiva, Iris and Choroid Changes from baseline in localized pigmentation (nevi and freckles) of the conjunctiva, iris and choroid were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Eyelash Darkening/Thickening Changes from baseline in eyelash darkening/thickening/lengthening were reported at each follow-up visit. Photographs were taken at the discretion of investigators as per standard of care. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Length of Eyelash (by Caliper and/or Ruler) The longest eyelash (mm) measured by caliper or ruler was recorded at baseline and each follow-up visit. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Change From Baseline to Last Available Observation in Corneal Thickness (Pachymeter) Central corneal thickness was measured using a calibrated pachymeter, preferably an ultrasonic pachymeter. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Conjunctival/Ocular Hyperemia Conjunctiva hyperemia was assessed by slit-lamp examination. When slit-lamp examination is not possible due to subject cooperation, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used to assess this parameter. Conjunctival hyperemia was assessed and graded by ophthalmologist at baseline and follow-up visits from grades 0-3 and is as follows:
0 = None, Normal: few vessels of palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva easily observed
= Mild, Reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
= Moderate, Bright reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
= Severe, Deep, bright, and diffuse reddening of the palpebral or bulbar conjunctiva
Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Number of Participants With a Change in Anterior Segment Biomicroscopy Slit-lamp biomicroscopy (mounted or hand-held) without fluorescein and without dilation of the pupil was performed. When slit-lamp examination was not possible, a fixation light and 20-diopter lens (for magnification) was used. At each scheduled visit, deposition of pigment on the corneal endothelial layer or the lens capsule or any abnormalities of the lids, conjunctivae, cornea, anterior chamber, iris, or lens was examined. Evaluated at Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months
Secondary Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Fundoscopy Posterior Segment at Baseline Fundoscopy was performed after dilation of the pupils (eg, 1 % tropicamide or cyclopentolate and 2 ½ % phenylephrine, or a clinically- appropriate dose according to the clinician's standard care of each particular patient). The examination included an evaluation of the vitreous body, retina (including the macula), and optic nerve head.
The fundoscopy e-CRF was completed only at baseline because the investigators were required to perform slit lamp, direct or indirect ophthalmoscopy at each visit and report any AEs observed which included the vitreous, retina and optic nerve.
Evaluated at Baseline
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06000865 - Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE N/A
Recruiting NCT06278597 - Automatic Evaluation of the Anterior Chamber Angle Width by a New Non-contact Optical Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04271709 - Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT) N/A
Recruiting NCT03274024 - The Asia Primary Tube Versus Trab (TVT) Study N/A
Completed NCT04552964 - Assessment of the Impact of an add-on and Its Smartphone Application on the Daily Management of Glaucoma N/A
Recruiting NCT01957267 - Functional and Structural Imaging for Glaucoma
Active, not recruiting NCT04624698 - iStent Inject New Enrollment Post-Approval Study N/A
Completed NCT04020705 - The Efficacy of Citicoline in Eyedrops (OMK1) in Reducing the Progression of Glaucoma N/A
Completed NCT03150160 - Additive Effect of Twice-daily Brinzolamide 1%/Brimonidine 0.2%Combination as an Adjunctive Therapy to Travoprost in Patients With Normal Tension Glaucoma Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05581498 - Glaucoma Exercise as Medicine Study (GEMS). N/A
Recruiting NCT02921568 - Side-by-Side Comparison of P200TE and Spectral OCT/SLO on Diseased Eyes N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02901730 - Clinical Study of LPI With Different Laser Wavelengths N/A
Completed NCT02955849 - A Trial of China Laser and Surgery Study Glaucoma in Rural China Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT02471105 - Investigation of IOP and Tolerability of Bimatoprost 0.01% and Tafluprost Unit Dose Preservative Free 15 Microgram/ml Phase 4
Recruiting NCT02554214 - Pilot Clinical Trial on a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT02390284 - Stop Retinal Ganglion Cell Dysfunction Study Phase 3
Completed NCT02520674 - Glaucoma Screening With Smartphone Ophthalmology N/A
Completed NCT02653963 - Triamcinolone for Ahmed Glaucoma Valve N/A
Completed NCT02628223 - 180 Degree vs. 360 Degree Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty as Initial Therapy for Glaucoma N/A
Completed NCT02246764 - Study of Netarsudil (AR-13324) Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Phase 3