Coronally Advanced Flap and PRF With or Without Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft in Gingival Recession

Gingival Recession Clinical Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02835430
• Other study ID #: DPU/831(11)/2014
• Status: Completed
• Phase: Phase 4
• First received: July 9, 2016
• Last updated: July 16, 2016
• Start date: November 2014
• Est. completion date: July 2016

Study information

• Verified date: July 2016
• Source: Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: India: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

• Gingival recession is defined as the apical migration of gingival margin beyond cemento-enamel junction with the exposure of root surface. More than 20% of the population presents one or more tooth surfaces with gingival recession.

• The main conditions leading to the development of this defect are gingival anatomical factors, chronic trauma, periodontitis, malposed tooth and dentinal hypersensitivity.

• The main goal of treating gingival recession is to restore the gingival margin to cement-enamel junction (CEJ) and normal sulcus with a functional attachment.

• A recent innovation in Guided Tissue Regeneration (GTR) technique is the use of second generation platelet concentrate, called as Platelet-Rich Fibrin membrane (PRF) that contains growth factors and cicatricial properties for root coverage procedures.

• Space is necessary to provide a channel for the migration of progenitor cells towards and on the denuded root surface, where they can differentiate into cementum and periodontal ligament cells.

• Since the gingival recession defects are non-space making, it may be difficult using the membrane technique alone, and hence, the use of a graft material underneath the membrane may help to resolve this problem. Root coverage tended to be better with the addition of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). These allografts prevent the collapse of membrane into the defect, stimulate the proliferation of osteogenic progenitor cells, and are thus, capable of promoting regeneration of attachment apparatus.

• Till date, no study is available in the literature on clinical evaluation of CAF (Coronally Advanced Flap)+PRF+DFDBA vs CAF+PRF for the management of gingival recession defects.

• And hence, this study is designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of DFDBA (Rocky Mountain Particulate Allograft) for the management of isolated gingival recession defects.

Description:

SURGICAL PROCEDURE:

I. After patient selection and obtaining informed consent, a total of 10 bilateral facial, Miller's Class I or II gingival recession defects were consecutively treated. Test and Control site were randomly assigned by flip coin technique.

II. The Test sites were treated using CAF+PRF+DFDBA and the Control sites were treated using CAF+PRF.

III. Under local anesthesia, an intrasulcular incision was given using a surgical bade on the buccal aspect of the involved tooth. The incision was extended horizontally to dissect the buccal aspect of the adjacent papillae, both mesially and distally, leaving the gingival margin of the adjacent teeth untouched. Two oblique releasing incisions were made from the mesial and distal extremities of the horizontal incision beyond the mucogingival junction.

IV. Partial-full-partial thickness flap was raised and extended beyond the mucogingival junction. The exposed root surface was thoroughly debrided and prepared to reduce the root convexities, if any.

V. A mesio-distal and apical dissection parallel to the vestibular lining mucosa was performed to release the residual muscle tension and facilitate the passive coronal displacement of the flap. The papillae adjacent to the involved tooth was de-epithelialized.

Preparation of PRF:

Preoperatively, a 10 ml of blood sample of the patient without anticoagulant was collected in a test tube and centrifuged immediately at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The platelet-rich fibrin clot was separated from the other two layers (acellular plasma and red blood cells) and prepared in the form of a membrane by squeezing out fluids from the fibrin clot.

. For Test site: i. Following pre-suturing, DFDBA (Rocky Mountain Particulate Allograft) was placed over the exposed root and adjacent bone surface and subsequently covered by PRF membrane.

ii. Flap was coronally displaced without tension and sutured using 4-0 mersilk non-resorbable suture.

iii. Additional lateral sutures were placed to close the releasing incisions.

. For Control site: i. Following pre-suturing, exposed root and adjacent bone surfaces were covered by PRF membrane.

ii. Flap was coronally displaced without tension and sutured using 4-0 mersilk non-resorbable suture.

iii. Additional lateral sutures were placed to close the releasing incisions.

Post-surgical protocols:

Postoperative instructions were given along with a recommendation to refrain from mechanical cleaning on the surgical areas. Periodontal dressing was placed at both Test and Control sites. Patients were instructed to apply 0.12% chlorhexidine solution (1:1 dilution) with a cotton swab twice daily for 14 days. Analgesics and antibiotics were prescribed and suture removal was performed 14 days post-surgery.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 10
• Est. completion date: July 2016
• Est. primary completion date: June 2016
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 18 Years to 45 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age group of 18-45 years from both sexes.

• Presence of bilateral isolated gingival recession classified as Miller's class I or class II recession defects in anteriors and/or premolars.

• Systemically healthy patients.

• Patients willing to comply with all study-related procedures and available for follow-up.

• Ability to maintain good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria:

• History of prolonged use of antibiotics/steroids/immunosuppressive agents/aspirin/ anticoagulants/other medications.

• Pregnant/Lactating women.

• Tobacco in any form.

• History of systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes, HIV, bone metabolic disorders, radiation therapy, immunosuppressive therapy, cancer.

• Patients with unacceptable oral hygiene.

• Faulty tooth brushing technique.

• Malaligned teeth.

• Cervical abrasion.

• Unwilling patients.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Gingival Recession

Intervention

Procedure:
• Coronally advanced flap and PRF with DFDBA
• For Test site: i. Following pre-suturing of coronally advanced flap, DFDBA (Rocky Mountain Particulate Allograft) was placed over the exposed root and adjacent bone surface and subsequently covered by PRF membrane.
• Coronally advanced flap and PRF without DFDBA
. For Control site: i. Following pre-suturing of coronally avanced flap, exposed root and adjacent bone surface was covered by PRF membrane.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Dr. D. Y. Patil Dental College & Hospital

References & Publications (2)

Nanditha S, Priya MS, Sabitha S, Arun KV, Avaneendra T. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of a GTR membrane (HEALIGUIDE) and demineralised bone matrix (OSSEOGRAFT) as a space maintainer in the treatment of Miller's Class I gingival recession. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Apr;15(2):156-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.84386. — View Citation

Padma R, Shilpa A, Kumar PA, Nagasri M, Kumar C, Sreedhar A. A split mouth randomized controlled study to evaluate the adjunctive effect of platelet-rich fibrin to coronally advanced flap in Miller's class-I and II recession defects. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2013 Sep;17(5):631-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.119281. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Recession Depth (RD)	Recession depth (RD), measured from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to the most apical extension of gingival margin at Baseline and 6 months post-surgery.	Change from Baseline Recession Depth at 6 months.	No
Secondary	Relative Attachment Level (RAL)	Relative Attachment Level from the lower border of stent to the base of sulcus at Baseline and 6 months post-surgery.	Change from Baseline Relative Attachment Level at 6 months.	No
Secondary	Probing Depth	Probing depth was recorded from the crest of gingival margin to the base of gingival sulcus at Baseline and 6 months post-surgery.	Change from Baseline Probing Depth at 6 months.	No
Secondary	Width of Keratinized Gingiva (WKG)	Width of Keratinized Gingiva (WKG) measured from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction at Baseline and 6 months post-surgery.	Change from Baseline Width of Keratinized Gingiva at 6 months.	No
Secondary	Percentage of Root Coverage	(Preoperative recession depth - Postoperative recession depth)/ Preoperative recession depth * 100, at 6 months post-surgery.	At 6 months.	No