View clinical trials related to Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage.
Filter by:Acute Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding are a common chief complaint among Emergency Department. The mortality rate for Lower GI Bleeding is 3.9%. While the mortality rate can be as high as 10% for Upper GI Bleeding. Most existing scores take into account hemodynamic parameters such as systolic blood pressure or heart rate. Studies have shown that hemodynamic instability only develops late in the course of a bleed, as evidenced by a blood depletion of 30 to 40% of the total blood volume. Currently, few studies have examined the value of echocardiography in the management of patients presenting for Acute GI Bleeding in the Emergency Department. The main objective of this study is to show whether simple ultrasound parameters can, combined with clinico biological parameters, predict in an early manner the evolution of the patient presenting to the Emergency Department for Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding occurs distal to the ligament of treitz and may involve the small bowel, colon and rectum . Active lower gastrointestinal bleeding is a common, potentially life threatening medical presentation that can be challenging to localize and treat . There are many diseases that may cause lower gastrointestinal bleeding, including angiodysplasia, diverticulosis, benign or malignant bowel neoplasm, inflammatory bowel disease, ischemic bowel disease, and infectious bowel disease. Often, gastrointestinal bleeding will stop spontaneously, but in approximately 25% of patients, bleeding is massive or recurrent, requiring imaging localization and directed therapy.
Gastrointestinal bleeding represents a serious clinical problem and a common cause of hospitalisation with a mortality rate of 6-10% for upper Gastrointestinal bleeding and of 4% for lower Gastrointestinal bleeding requires a multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists, endoscopists, surgeons and radiologists. Gastrointestinal bleeding is self-limited in 80% of cases requiring only supportive measures. However, the persistence of bleeding represents a diagnostic challenge to locate the site of bleeding especially in severe bleeding and to determine, if possible its cause. This will allow to select the most appropriate therapeutic approach in order to reduce the morbidity and mortality, the length of hospitalisation and the transfusion requirements. Current diagnostic algorithms vary widely from institution to institution and from clinician to clinician. Imaging modalities remain the mainstay of the diagnostic approach. They include endoscopy, video capsule, radionuclide imaging, catheter angiography and multidetector computed tomography imaging. In recent years, Multidetector computed tomography has emerged as a promising technology to evaluate Gastrointestinal bleeding. The modality's ease of use and rapid results favour its use in any emergent situation. In addition, today's high-speed, narrow collimation multi-detector technology allows a large coverage area with minimal motion artifacts, with the ability to capture both arterial and venous phase with ease. Multidetector computed tomography is being increasingly used as this is a widely available, non-invasive and fast diagnostic technique that allows for visualisation of the entire intestinal tract and its lesions, the identification of vascularity and possible vascular abnormalities.
Small bowel capsule endoscopy is a test used to investigate for any abnormalities in the small bowel. The small bowel is about 4 meters long. The battery time of the capsule is about 8 hours. During this time the capsule takes pictures as it passes through the small bowel. In about 15-20% of capsule tests the battery expires before the capsule passes through the entire small bowel into the colon. Incomplete tests indicate that a variable portion of small bowel was not visualized. Incomplete tests are associated with potential missing of abnormalities in the portion of small bowel that was not reached. The capsule test may often required to be repeated but the problem of incomplete examination may persist. At present no medication has been approved to increase the rate of complete capsule tests. Prucalopride is a medication that has been approved in Canada and Europe for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation. Animal and human studies suggested that prucalopride may enhance the movement of the stomach and the small bowel. A recent presentation at a medical meeting suggested that prucalopride may accelerate the passage of the capsule camera through the small bowel without increasing the chance to miss a lesion in the small bowel. The purpose of this study is to asses if the administration of a single dose of prucalopride is going to decrease the time required by the capsule to move through the small bowel.
The non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is defined as gastrointestinal bleeding located proximal to the angle of Treitz, whose cause is not related to esophagogastric varices or gastropathy of portal hypertension. Animal studies showed no absorption in the GIT and disposal within 48 hours of application, and no reported cases of obstruction. Recently, a prospective study involving 20 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, showed that the application of hemospray ® promoted hemostasis in 95% of cases, confirmed by endoscopic revision 72h after application without any complication.
One of the well-known of complications post colonic polypectomy is bleeding usually occuring in the 2-week period following the procedure. Patients treated with oral anticoagulation (e.g. Warfarin) are a special and challenging patient group due to the need on the one hand to prevent thromboembolic events, and on the second hand to minimize the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding. Current practice guidelines recommend holding Warfarin treatment while bridging with LMW Heparin while resuming Warfarin treatment following the procedure. This practice was found to be associated with a much higher rate of bleeding compared with continuing Warfarin in a recent prospective trial in pacemaker transplanted patients. The fact that most post-polypectomy bleeding occurs within the 2-week period further questions the current practice of periprocedural bridging therapy. the investigators therefore hypothesize that patients with continuous Warfarin treatment may have similar post-polypectomy bleeding rates compared to patients receiving bridging therapy with LMW Heparin. This is a multicenter single-blinded prospective randomized trial comparing small post-polypectomy (polyps<10mm) bleeding rates between two groups of patients: Continuous therapy with Warfarin, vs. LMW Heparin therapy while withholding Warfarin therapy (current practice).
The purpose of this study is to conduct a randomized control trial, double-blind study to compare Hexacapron with standard of care treatment to standard of care alone to evaluate the efficacy of adding effect of Hexacapron to standard therapy by decreasing the episodes of rebleeding and mortality in patient with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
The risk of bleeding after polypectomy of large colorectal polyps in patients taking aspirin is uncertain. This is a randomized, multi-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to compare the risk of significant bleeding after endoscopic polypectomy of large (>=10mm) colorectal polyps in patients continuing or discontinuing on daily acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use. Eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a group taking 75mg daily ASA or placebo 7 days before and 14 days following polypectomy. The primary endpoint of the study is bleeding within 30 days from colorectal polypectomy. The secondary endpoints are composite cardiovascular events occurring between the date of randomization and 30 days after polypectomy.