View clinical trials related to Frailty.
Filter by:The aim of the prospective study is to assess the feasibility of a screening and baseline measurement protocol that is planned for a main study (PRÄP-GO) in a collective of 30 patients ageing 70+ scheduled for elective surgery. Comprehensive geriatric assessment scores and modified Fried frailty phenotype component evaluation are performed in all patients at baseline before elective surgery. The assessment of cognitive tests is conducted with a battery of neuropsychological tests, computer-based tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery [CANTAB®] and non-computer based tests. Frailty scores from 0 to 5 (i.e., 1 point for each component; 0 = best to 5 = worst) represent robust (0), pre-frail (1-2), and frail (3-5) health status. 10 patients without Frailty, 10 patients with Pre-Frailty and 10 patients with Frailty should be analyzed in this study and receive further comprehensive geriatric assessment testing up to seven days after surgery/discharge (before 7 postoperative days).
PARCHED (Prompting And encouRaging Community Hydration through EDucation) is studying how to improve the hydration (fluid intake) of people living at home who use catheters. The investigator would like to see if improved hydration (fluid intake) reduces the risk of frailty. PARCHED will randomise four areas in Cwm Taf University Health Board to receive one of four different interventions. Individuals will receive an intervention based on which area they live in, each participant will take part in the study for 12 weeks.
Frailty is closely linked to the success of lung transplantations (LTx) (1,2). Studies have shown that frailty causes a diminished physical performance in candidates for LTx and an increased 30 day rate of re-hospitalization after surgery. Furthermore, frailty is associated with a higher one-year-mortality rate after LTx in frail compared to non-frail patients (1,3,4). Some evidence that frailty in LTx-candidates can be decreased by a suitable rehabilitation program suggests that improving the frailty status in post-LTx patients can be a further strategy to contribute to an overall success in LTx. However, at the moment these possible benefits are not investigated yet. Therefore the aim of this study is to observe the effect of a three-week inpatient rehabilitation on frailty in patients after LTx.
In this single-center retrospective study we wanted to investigate mortality and postoperative complications after emergency laparotomy performed in patients aged 80 years or above.
There are few studies that already have validated specific raw accelerometer cut-points for people over 65 years old. The purpose of the present study is to validate raw accelerometer cut points for general people over 65 years old and specific raw accelerometer cut points based on the functional status of older adults over 65 years old. The study will be carried out with an observational approach. Participants will be divided into 4 groups. First of them will be made grouping all subjects and the rest divided according to their functional status. They will perform different-intensity physical activities while wearing accelerometers attached to their body and wearing a portable gas analyser too. Their intensity will be assessed based on their own Rest Metabolic Rate (RMR). Energy expenditure and accelerations will be matched and, based on that, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity cut-points will be derived.
Randomized clinical trial of multimodal prehabilitation in vulnerable patients with colon or rectal cancer prior to surgery.
The aims of this study are to validate the reliability and validity of Elderly Health Questionnaire in assessing frailty risk of community-dwelling older adults.
The purpose of this cross-sectional study is to validate the Spanish version of the Kihon Checklist for screening frailty in Spanish community-dwelling older adults.
Sarcopenia and frailty are two major syndromes in older adults. They are shown to be associated with low levels of functioning and higher rates of morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aim to report the prevalence of sarcopenia and frailty by using simple assessment methods such as SARC-F and FRAIL, respectively.
Background: In Demark we se an increasing life expectancy and an increasing incidence of esophageal cancer and gastroesophageal junction (c.esophagus), with an average age of 65 years at diagnosis time. The consequence of this is an increased number of patients in need of esophageal resection. Esophageal cancer is currently treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy and, whenever possible, esophageal resection. This multimodal treatment has increased survival, but is also associated with significant morbidity, mortality and adverse postoperative quality of life. At present, there is no standardized risk assessment for patients with c.esophagus who have to undergo esophageal resection. This study evaluates the preoperative risk using the frailty score system, CAF (comprehensive assessment of frailty) score, which identify patients being frail or not based on an assessment of the patient's physical condition. Purpose: Investigate how many patients that are frail undergoing esophageal resection. With the assumptions that CAF score can identify frail patients and that frail patients, have an increased risk of postoperative complications. With CAF score, we believe to become better of predicting complications following esophageal resection. Method: Prospective observational study of patients with c.esophagus undergoing esophageal resection. Plan to include 60 patients over one year period. The patients are deemed frail or not with the use of CAF score, which consist of various smaller physical test and questions. Postoperativley a follow-up after 30-days, six month and 12 month. At follow-up times, data are collected on the somatic readmissions / diagnoses and vital status. Afterwards we compare complications, mortality and quality of life in frail versus non-frail patients. Side effects, risks and disadvantages: At present, there is no standardized risk assessment used for preoperative risk assessment for patients with c.esophagus undergoing esophageal resection. The introduction of CAF score, will not expose patients to a risk or side effect, since the course or treatment does not change. Economy: We consider the study to be economically justified, since we hypothesize that this would lead to fewer readmissions, days of intensive care and shorter hospitalization. Acquisition: The patients will be 60 years or older and are undergoing esophageal resection. They will receive verbal- and written information preoperatively. At the first appearance they meet our project assistant who will answer any questions. Subsequently, the patients will be asked to sign a consent form. Publication of test results / research ethics statement: The knowledge and results gained through the research will provide essential scientific information of significans for the future course and treatment of patients undergoing esophageal resection in terms of number of hospital days, intensive days and readmissions.