Fracture;Elbow Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparing Outcomes of Extended Elbow Versus Flexed Elbow Casting for Treatment of Displaced Pediatric Both Bone Forearm Fractures: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Verified date | April 2020 |
Source | University of Wisconsin, Madison |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The study design is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing extended elbow and flexed elbow casting. This study design will provide the highest quality evidence to investigate our primary hypothesis that extended elbow casting for proximal both bone forearm fractures will result in less loss of fracture alignment. The study population eligible for screening will be patients with open growth plates and both bone forearm fractures.
Status | Withdrawn |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | October 15, 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | October 15, 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | N/A to 18 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Both bone forearm fractures in which the fracture of the radius and/or ulna is located in the proximal one half of the bone 2. The fracture requires a reduction maneuver 3. All skeletally immature individuals under the age of 18 4. Patient aged greater than three years old 5. Patient or patient's consenting parent/guardian competent in English. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Skeletally mature individuals 2. Both fractures are located in the distal one-half of the radius and ulna 3. Isolated fractures of the radius or ulna 4. The fracture does not require a reduction maneuver 5. Any nerve or arterial injury in the injured extremity 6. Humerus fracture on the ipsilateral side 7. Any open fracture requiring formal surgical debridement 8. Patient or patient's consenting parent/guardian not competent in English. 9. Patient or patient's consenting parent/guardian not present. 9. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up (e.g live in different state) 10. Contractures in which applying an extended elbow cast is not possible or practical |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | American Family Children's Hospital | Madison | Wisconsin |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of Wisconsin, Madison |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Alignment | To compare the proportion of proximal both bone forearm fractures that have lost alignment within 6 weeks in patients treated in a flexed elbow cast compared to those treated in an extended elbow cast. | 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Complication Rate | To compare cast complication rate between those treated in cast with elbow in flexion compared to those treated with elbow in extension. | approximately 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Range of Motion | To compare elbow range of motion at 6 weeks and 24 weeks post-treatment between patients treated in cast with elbow in flexion compared to those treated with elbow in extension | 6 weeks and 24 weeks | |
Secondary | Caregiver Satisfaction Scores | Overall condition and satisfaction of patient's cast. Measured by: excellent, good, average, below average, or poor. |
6 weeks |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT02963233 -
Type II Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fracture Management and Outcomes: A Prospective Multi-centre Cohort Study
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05135949 -
Strength After Elbow Fractures in the Elderly
|