Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04844372 |
Other study ID # |
RECHMPL21_0091 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
March 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
March 29, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
April 2022 |
Source |
University Hospital, Montpellier |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study aims to compare the hemodynamic impact of two anaesthetic strategies 'Regional
anesthesia' versus 'General anesthesia' in leg and ankle fractures surgery.
Description:
Leg and/or ankle surgery is frequently performed under General Anesthesia (GA). GA is
frequently associated with a high risk of hypotension with significant consequences.
Regional anesthesia could be an interesting alternative to GA in order to limit hemodynamic
consequences, especially in elderly patients.
Furthermore, in the current state of Covid 19 crisis, regional anesthesia could provide
solutions in preserving drugs for GA and exposing less medical staff on patient's airway.
Currently, unlike neuraxial anesthesia, few data deal with impact of peripheral RA and
hemodynamic consequences.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of Regional anesthesia reduces the use of
intraoperative vasopressor.
After ethical committee approval, a retrospective cohort of patients with lower limb
traumatism, in Montpellier's University Hospital, was analyzed from 2016 to 2020. An
informational note was given to all patients participating to the study.