Clinical Trials Logo

Foramen Ovale, Patent clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Foramen Ovale, Patent.

Filter by:
  • Active, not recruiting  
  • « Prev · Page 2

NCT ID: NCT00283738 Active, not recruiting - Migraine Clinical Trials

MIST II PFO-Migraine Trial With BioSTAR® Bioabsorbable Septal Repair Implant

Start date: February 2006
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The objective of the study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PFO closure with the BioSTAR Septal Repair Implant System in a population of patients that have refractory migraine (with aura) and who have failed medications.

NCT ID: NCT00201461 Active, not recruiting - Stroke Clinical Trials

Evaluation of the STARFlex® Septal Closure System in Patients With a Stroke or TIA Due to the Possible Passage of a Clot of Unknown Origin Through a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO)

Start date: June 2003
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the STARFlex® septal closure system will safely and effectively prevent a recurrent embolic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and mortality in patients with a PFO and to demonstrate superiority of the STARFlex® device compared to best medical therapy.

NCT ID: NCT00196027 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Patent Foramen Ovale

Paradigm I Clinical Trial: Study of the PFX Closure System in Subjects With Cryptogenic Stroke, Transient Ischemia Attack or Paradoxical Embolism

Start date: April 2005
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the safety of the PFX Closure System when utilized for patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) suffering from cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attacks or paradoxical embolism.

NCT ID: NCT00166257 Active, not recruiting - Clinical trials for Heart Septal Defects, Atrial

PC-Trial: Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Embolism

Start date: February 2000
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare two treatments strategies to prevent further attacks in patients who have suffered an stroke or occlusion of a major artery with no obvious reason other than a persistent small opening between the upper heart chambers