Online Self-management in Fibromyalgia

Fibromyalgia Clinical Trial

Official title:

An Online Self-management Intervention for Patients With Hand Fibromyalgia - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06322485
• Other study ID #: P16.230
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 25, 2017
• Est. completion date: January 26, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: March 2024
• Source: Leiden University Medical Center
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study has been previously registered with the National Trial Registry (NTR6267) that has been cancelled. The registered trial has been automatically transferred to a new "Landelijk Trial Register", which does not contain all correct information on the current study and where no corrections can be made. Hence, the current study has been registered again with ClinicalTrials.gov. The goal of this clinical trial is to study the effectiveness of an internet-based self-management intervention in adult patients with fibromyalgia. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be performed, in which 70 participants will be randomized to either the self-management intervention or a waitlist control condition (patients in the waitlist condition will receive the intervention after the intervention ends in the intervention group, i.e., after 6 months). The primary effect constitutes of the difference in change in pain coping between patients in the intervention and control condition from baseline to post-intervention. As secondary outcomes, a number of other psychological and physical outcome measures will be assessed (e.g., health-related quality of life, well-being, pain impact on daily life, pain cognitions). Also, cost-effectiveness of the intervention and the quality of the therapeutic relationship will be measured.

Description:

Rationale: Fibromyalgia has a high clinical burden, with patients experiencing considerable pain, physical disability, and an often decreased health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Improving patients' skills in managing a chronic condition ("self-management") is increasingly recognized as vital in the treatment of somatic conditions and is becoming more common in clinical practice and research. In this study, the effectiveness of an internet-based self-management intervention focusing on coping skills related to chronic pain compared with a waitlist control condition is studied. Objective: To study the effectiveness of the internet-based self-management intervention in patients with fibromyalgia. Study design: An RCT will be performed, in which 70 patients will be randomized to either the internet-based self-management intervention or a waitlist control group. Baseline, post-intervention, 6-week, and three-month follow-up questionnaires will be used to measure primary and secondary outcomes. Study population: Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with fibromyalgia (confirmed by their general practitioner or a medical specialist) who visit the 'Fibrocentrum', a fibromyalgia treatment centre in Leiden, The Netherlands, will be invited to participate in the study. Patients need to have a pain duration of a minimum of 3 months, be fluent in Dutch, be able to give informed consent, and own a computer with internet access. Difficulties with (written) communication and internet literacy, severe physical and psychiatric comorbidities that interfere with the study protocol (e.g., addiction, psychosis, and suicidal ideation), pregnancy, on-going psychological treatment elsewhere, and participation in other clinical trials are exclusion criteria. Intervention: The cognitive-behavioral intervention begins with a face-to-face intake session in which personal goals for the intervention are set. Afterwards, the tailored self-management intervention, consisting of 6 modules, will be offered via an internet-based program. The first introductory module includes goal-setting and the last module includes relapse prevention; the four modules in between focus on learning how to cope with the consequences of a chronic condition in daily life. The topics of the modules are (1) activity, (2) mood, (3) thoughts, and (4) the social environment. At least once a week, a psychologist provides participants with feedback and motivational support through messages in a secured mail box in the internet-based program. After finishing the internet-based intervention, two booster sessions will take place via telephone (1 month and 2,5 months after the program). Patients will be called by their psychologist and their goals will be evaluated and strategies to strengthen the achieved results will be discussed. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary effect will be determined by comparing the VAS pain coping scores after the intervention between the waitlist control group and intervention group, corrected for baseline VAS pain coping scores. As secondary outcomes, several other psychological and physical outcomes will be measured (e.g., HR-QoL, pain cognitions, pain impact on daily life, well-being), as well as quality of the therapeutic relationship and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In the waitlist control condition, patients will receive the intervention after the intervention ends in the intervention group (after 6 months). In the intervention group patients will be offered an internet-based self-management intervention, which could improve their pain coping and other psychological and physical outcomes. No risk is involved with participation in this study. The only burden for participants is time investment.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 70
• Est. completion date: January 26, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: January 26, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosed with fibromyalgia, as previously confirmed by their treating general practitioner or a medical specialist.

2. Pain complaints with a minimal duration of 3 months.

3. Minimum age of 18 years.

4. Fluent in Dutch.

5. Able to give informed consent.

6. Own a computer with internet access.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Difficulties with (written) communication (e.g., due to analphabetism) and with internet literacy.

2. Severe physical and psychiatric comorbidities that interfere with the study protocol, such as psychosis, addiction, suicidal ideation.

3. On-going psychological treatment elsewhere.

4. Participation in other clinical trials.

5. Pregnancy.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Fibromyalgia
• Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Internet-based self-management intervention
An internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy with six modules.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Netherlands	Fibrocentrum	Leiden	Zuid-Holland

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Leiden University	Fibrocentrum

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Economic evaluation: Five-Level Version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)	The intervention will be economically evaluated with the Five-Level Version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Five items cover 5 dimensions of health-related quality of life: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems" is used in the questionnaire, with higher scores indicating more issues in a dimension. The 5 dimensions can be summed into a health state and utility values can be calculated for these health states.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
Other	Economic evaluation: iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ)	The intervention will be economically evaluated with the iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), which measures health-care utilization.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
Other	Economic evaluation: iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ)	The intervention will be economically evaluated with the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). Productivity losses are assessed in three modules in this questionnaire, so that certain types of productivity losses can be omitted when these are not applicable to a population.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.
Other	Patient satisfaction	The experience and satisfaction of patients with the intervention, and the perceived effect of the intervention will be assessed with an evaluation questionnaire comprising various numerical rating scales, Likert scales, and open questions.	Immediately after the intervention.
Other	Expected/perceived patient-provider interaction	The Internet-specific Therapeutic Relationship Questionnaire (ITRQ) will be used to assess the expected/perceived patient-provider interaction. The ITRQ comprises 10 items that are measured on a 10-point Likert scale ranging from "totally disagree" to "completely agree". The questionnaire consists of two scales (Internet-specific Time and Attention and Internet-specific Reflection and Comfort) and a total score. Higher scores reflect a stronger therapeutic relationship.	Baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Primary	Change in pain coping	A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain coping, with higher scores indicating better pain coping. The primary endpoint is the difference in change in pain coping between patients in the intervention and control condition from baseline to post-intervention (immediately after the intervention).	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in well-being	A VAS from 0 to 10 will be used to measure well-being, with higher scores indicating better well-being.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in illness cognitions	Illness cognitions will be assessed by the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ; using Helplessness and Acceptance scales). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "completely". Higher scale scores reflect greater use of the assessed construct.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in pain coping strategies	Pain coping strategies will be assessed by the Pain Coping Inventory (PCI) that comprises six scales, namely, Pain Transformation, Distraction, and Reducing Demands (three active pain coping strategies), and Retreating, Worrying, and Resting (three passive pain coping strategies). Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from "hardly ever" to "very often". Higher scale scores reflect greater use of the assessed pain coping strategy.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in Illness Perceptions	Illness perceptions will be assessed by the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). The Identity scale consists of the sum of yes-rated items (patients rate whether they believe certain symptoms to be related to their illness). Furthermore, the remaining scales described below are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". High scores on the Timeline Acute/Chronic and Cyclical, Consequences, and Emotional Representations scales indicate beliefs about the chronicity and cyclical nature of the illness, the negative consequences of the illness, and patients' emotional experience of their illness. High scores on the Personal and Treatment Control and Illness Coherence scales reflect positive beliefs about perceived control and an understanding of the illness.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in pain	A VAS ranging from 0 to 10 will be used to measure pain, with higher scores reflecting more severe pain.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in pain interference in daily functioning and pain severity, and as exploratory measures support, life control, and affective distress	Part 1 of the Multidimensional Pain Inventory-Dutch Language Version (MPI-DLV) will be used with Interference and Pain Severity scales and as exploratory measures Support, Life Control, and Affective Distress. Items are rated on different 7-point Likert scales, with higher scores reflecting greater intensity in a subscale.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in health-related quality of life	Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the RAND-36, which consists of 36 items that are averaged, resulting in eight health scale scores, namely Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Role Limitations due to Personal or Emotional Problems, Social Functioning, Emotional Well-being, Energy/Fatigue, Bodily Pain, and General Health Perceptions. The questionnaire also includes one item on perceived change in health. Besides, physical and mental health composite scores will be calculated. Higher scores reflect more favorable health states.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in fibromyalgia impact	The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) consists of 10 self-rated items covering the impact of fibromyalgia on different aspects of functioning and well-being. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting worse fibromyalgia impact.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 6 weeks and 3 months follow-up.
Secondary	Change in health-related quality of life	Health-related quality of life will be assessed by the Five-Level Version of the EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). In this questionnaire, 5 dimensions are measured in 5 items: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. A 5-point Likert scale ranging from "no problems" to "extreme problems" is used for every dimension, with higher scores reflecting more problems in a dimension. A VAS ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = "The best health you can imagine" to 100 = "The worst health you can imagine") is applied as well, with higher scores indicating a better health state as perceived by the patient.	Baseline, immediately after the intervention, at 3 months follow-up.