View clinical trials related to Femoral Neck Fractures.
Filter by:The objective of this post-market clinical follow-up study is to confirm the safety and performance of the Avenir® Cemented Hip stem when used in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcome and the rate of reoperations in a cohort of patients with undisplaced femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation and patients with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hip arthroplasty. Methods In a consecutive series of patients we compared the results of internal fixation for undisplaced femoral neck fractures with those of hip arthroplasty for displaced fractures (control group) of elderly patients. Risk of reoperation and patient reported hip function assessed with Harris hip score and WOMAC were used as outcome measurements.
This is a Post Marketing Clinical Follow Up study (PMCF) on the AVANTAGE RELOAD dual mobility system cup.
Recent studies have indicated a high incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in elderly patients treated with two commonly used cemented polished, tapered femoral stems. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and incidence rate of PPF in a cohort of elderly with femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with either a collarless, polished, tapered stem (Exeter) or an anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP 2). Patients and Methods In a multicentre retrospective cohort study 2529 patients 60 years and above, with a FNF as indication for primary surgery with a cemented hip arthroplasty were included. Patients were treated either with a polished tapered Exeter stem or a matte anatomic Lubinus SP12 stem according to the surgeons preference or to the praxis of the present department. The incidence of perprosthetic femoral fractures Hip-related complications and repeat surgery were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively.
The primary objective of this study is to obtain implant survivorship and clinical outcomes data for the commercially available G7 BiSpherical Acetabular Shell.
To test that the SuperPATH approach is more safe and reliable for hip functional recovery compared with the postolateral approach in the artificial hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Blood transfusion is an expensive and finite resource and optimum transfusion threshold in surgical patients is yet to be defined. Patients commonly receive blood transfusions to reduce the risk of myocardial ischaemia or improve perfusion of other organs (e.g. the kidneys), but this treatment may have important adverse effects including postoperative infection. Patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur are often elderly, with co-morbidities and a high risk of postoperative complications, including MI and AKI. We propose to conduct a study with the following aims: 1. To describe the incidence of anaemia and transfusion in patients undergoing surgery for fractured neck of femur. 2. To use clinical and biochemical data to measure the incidence of perioperative cardiac and kidney injury in this group. 3. To evaluate highly sensitive serum troponin and urinary MALDI-MS as possible endpoints in a future prospective randomised trial of perioperative transfusion.
Displaced femoral neck fractures are one group of hip fracture patients that are commonly treated with cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). In the elective hip arthroplasty population, the direct anterior approach (DAA) has shown to be effective in helping patients to quickly obtain high postoperative function. This approach has also been shown to be effective in arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in a few studies. However, the only studies that directly compare two approaches for hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures utilize the anterolateral approach (ALA) versus posterior approach (PA) or DAA versus PA. No studies of which we are aware directly compare the DAA to the ALA. The DAA and ALA are the two most popular approaches for bipolar hemiarthroplasty at our institution, so we are setting out to determine the differences between them.
This study will investigate the effects of implantation of cemented femoral stem versus percutanous internal fixation with cannulated compression screws on hip joint function recovery, pains, femoral head collapse and sterile prosthesis loosening, peri-prosthesis infection, and the histocompatibility of prosthesis material with host tissue in the elderly patients with osteoporotic fracture of proximal femoral neck complicated by avascular necrosis of the femoral head, which will provide scientific evidence for selecting surgical methods and internal fixation/artificial prosthesis material for osteoporotic fracture of proximal femoral neck in the elderly patients.
To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is feasible for treating avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery.