View clinical trials related to Fecal Incontinence.
Filter by:The study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Solesta as an injectable bulking agent in the treatment of fecal incontinence for a total of 24 months after completed treatment.
A total of 26 healthy elderly male and female subjects will receive both 10 mg NRL001 in a 2 g rectal suppository and placebo in this double-blind, cross-over study. The order of treatment will be randomised, with a minimum washout period of 3 days between doses. An end of study assessment will be conducted at least 7 days after administration of the last treatment. The pharmacokinetics of NRL001 will be determined prior to, and after, dosing. Pharmacodynamics will be examined using a three lead Holter monitor during both treatment periods. Adverse Events, vital signs, ECGs and clinical laboratory parameters will be collected, tabulated, reviewed and recorded throughout the study.
Healthy subjects will receive NRL001 or placebo once daily for 14 days. The four treatment groups, shown below, will each consist of 12 subjects: Group 1; Nine subjects will receive a dose of 7.5 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository and three will receive matching placebo. Group 2; Nine subjects will receive a dose of 10 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository and three will receive matching placebo. Group 3; Nine subjects will receive a daily dose of 12.5 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository and three will receive matching placebo. Group 4; Nine subjects will receive a daily dose of 15 mg NRL001 in a 2 g suppository and three will receive matching placebo. The dosing of each group will be completed prior to the next group being dosed. Dose escalation will be dependent on a positive assessment of the safety profile of the preceding group by the Safety Monitoring Board. The pharmacokinetics of NRL001 will be determined on Days 1, 7 and 14. Pharmacodynamics will be examined using a three lead Holter monitor at screening and at intervals throughout the study period. Adverse events, vital signs, ECGs and clinical laboratory parameters will be collected, tabulated, reviewed and recorded throughout the study.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Sacral Nerve Stimulation (SNS) for idiopathic faecal incontinence affect cortical and deep brain activity in an acute and chronically stimulation model. Furthermore the association between brain activity and unilateral/bilateral SNS will be studied in each patient. Brain activity will be studied by use of positron emission tomography.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the TOPAS System effectively treats fecal incontinence in women as measured by a 50% reduction in the number of FI episodes in a 14 day bowel diary at 12 months.
Sacral nerve modulation (SNM) is an established treatment for refractory lower urinary tract and bowel dysfunction (Spinelli 2008). Pudendal nerve stimulation (PNS) has been proposed for patients failing SNM treatment of urinary dysfunction (Spinelli 2005). In this study SNM and PNS are compared for the treatment of fecal incontinence. In a test phase, both treatments will be applied for one week each in a randomized and blinded order (cross-over design). After the test phase the more successful treatment will be determined and applied permanently. If both treatments are equally sufficient, PNS will be chosen for permanent stimulation, since preliminary data indicate that PNS has a lower power consumption than SNM. Lower power consumption results in a longer lifetime of the stimulator, thus requiring less replacement surgeries.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Biodesign™ Surgisis® Tissue Graft to reinforce an overlapping sphincter repair versus the standard overlapping sphincter repair in controlling episodes of incontinence in patients who have fecal incontinence and a defect in the anal sphincter.
Fecal incontinence is a major public health issue since 10% of the French population aged 45 has to deal with it. Different treatments exist and have already been evaluated, like the sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) which has proved to be efficient in 75 to 100% of the anal incontinence patients without significant sphincteric lesions or rectal prolapse. However, the treatment is expensive and can have side effects. Moreover, about 20 to 30% of the patients can develop a resistance to the SNS only a few months following the definite implantation. Yet the development of the posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PNTS) offers a new perspective. It consists in stimulating the same metameric area as the sacral nerves. It is regularly used for the treatment of urinary incontinence caused by overactive bladder. It is a non-invasive technique, causing but a few side effects. A preliminary study showed that 7 in 10 incontinent patients saw an improvement when treated with PTNS. Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyse and evaluate the PTNS technique in the short term as a treatment of anal incontinence. It is done through the means of a multi-centric prospective randomized study. Patients: Will be included: all patients followed for anal incontinence (either with liquid or solid stools) having at least one accident a month for 3months, and who are not diagnosed with colorectal lesions and who are without anal or rectal significant anatomic anomalies, without rectal prolapse, and who have failed to respond to medical treatment (such as medicine or perineal reeducation). The main criterium to analyze the efficiency will be the number of fecal incontinence episodes on a bowel diary. The investigators aim to incorporate 144 patients, that is 72 in each group. 12 centers will take part in this study, that will last 2 years and 3 months. They are the centers of: Bordeaux, Clermont-Ferrand, Grenoble, Lyon, Marseille, Nancy, Nantes, Paris, Diaconesses-Croix,Paris Rothschild, Rennes, Rouen, and Toulouse. Method: The PTNS consists in setting two electrodes on the posterial tibial nerve pathway. The electrodes are connected to an external stimulator. After having drawn lots, patients will be treated for 3months either with effective stimulation (frequency: 14hz; impulse duration: 210usec;intensity:sensibility threshold), or with shame stimulation (intensity: 0mAmp). There will be two daily sessions of stimulation (effective, or shame), 20 min each. A pre-treatment assessment will be established, composed of a stool diary, a Cleveland Clinic score, a Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale and an anorectal manomety, that will all be repeated by the end of the treatment. Expected Results: The investigators hope to prove the short term efficacy of the PTNS on anal incontinence patients.
Background of the study: Fecal incontinence is a complex problem. The social consequences of this problem result in a lower quality of life. The exact prevalence of FI is unknown, literature reports vary from 13-19%. There are variable treatment options depending on the patient and the etiology of the FI. Dietary manipulation, pharmacological intervention, pelvic floor physiotherapy, as well as surgical interventions are currently used to treat FI. A promising current treatment is Percutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation (PTNS). The nerves in the spine that control bowel function also have branches which go to the ankle. Stimulating these nerves in the ankle has shown to be an effective treatment for FI in the short-term. The treatment has been shown to be safe and well tolerated by subjects with almost no morbidity in prior urology trials. Objective of the study: The objective of this study is to show that the results of PTNS are based on the treatment of electrical stimulation and not on a placebo effect with a sham treatment. Study design: This study is a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: The percentage of patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in incontinence episodes from baseline after 9 weeks of treatment. Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study (if applicable): Mean change in the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (CCF-FI Score) Mean change in Quality of Life scores in validated QoL questionnaires (SF-36, Digestive Health Status Instrument (DHSI), and Fecal Incontinence Quality of life) Subject's and Physician's Global Impression
Traumatic tears of the sphincter ani muscles after delivery may result in symptomatic urinary and anal incontinence, particularly in primiparas. The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercise (PFME) in treating urinary incontinence is well documented, however, to date there is little evidence to support the efficacy of PFME in treating symptomatic anal incontinence. This project consists of three separate studies. The prevalence survey/ study (1), investigates the prevalence of symptomatic anal incontinence among primiparas at Ostfold Hospital Trust Fredrikstad, Norway and St Olav's Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway, and the results in this study will form the basis of the two identical randomized controlled trials (RCT) investigating the treatment efficacy of PFME two groups of postpartum women. Women reporting symptomatic anal incontinence at six months postpartum (2) and women who have sustained a traumatic 3rd or 4th degree tear of the sphincter ani muscles during delivery (3), respectively, are randomized to an intervention group receiving PFME treatment for six months, or a control group. All RCT participants will undergo examination of PFM strength and activity, as well as anal ultrasound prior to randomization and after the intervention period.