Essential Hypertension Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 12 Weeks, Multi-center, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Phase IV Clinical Trial to Compare Evaluated Improvement of Edema Index, Safety and Efficacy of Amlodipine Versus S Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension
NCT number | NCT04554303 |
Other study ID # | AG-C1908 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Recruiting |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | October 28, 2020 |
Est. completion date | May 23, 2022 |
As a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), Amlodipine is mainly used in a single therapy or combined therapy for hypertension or angina. Edema, one of the most common side effects of dihydropyridine CCB formulations, may lead to drug control or discontinuation of drugs. This clinical study intends to assess the safety and efficacy of S-amlodipine, which is assessed to be superior to Amlodipine in the aspects of antihypertensive effect and side effects, in edema of patients with essential hypertension.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 80 |
Est. completion date | May 23, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | May 23, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 19 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with essential hypertension and diagnosed with stage 1-2 hypertension in accordance with the 2019 Korean Society of Hypertension criteria (SBP = 140 mmHg or DBP = 90 mmHg) 2. Where a subject and his/her spouse (partner) have agreed to use medically acceptable contraceptives in the following during participation in this clinical study: - Use of intrauterine device with proven failure rate of pregnancy; - Simultaneous use of blocking contraception and spermicide; - Has had a vasectomy; - Has had a salpingectomy, tubal ligation, or hysterectomy; 3. Those who have made voluntary decisions to participate in this clinical study and have consented to the Informed Consent Form in writing; 4. Those who are able to understand and follow instructions and participate throughout the entire clinical study Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients with uncontrolled, high-risk hypertension (SBP=180mm Hg and DBP=110mm Hg); 2. Those who have a history of secondary hypertension and any history of suspected secondary hypertension (aortic congestion, hyperaldosteronism, renal artery stenosis, Cushing's disease, chromaffinoma, polycystic renal disease, etc.); 3. Those who fall under one or more of the following items that may cause edema without underlying diseases: - Those who have been diagnosed with myocardial infarction or heart failure within 6 months of screening; - Those who have been diagnosed with a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of screening; - Patients with renal failure requiring dialysis or those with edema caused by renal dysfunction (renal salt retention); - Those who have uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c> 10.0%) or diabetic edema; - Patients with severe liver dysfunction or edema caused by liver disease (cirrhosis); - Other patients with hypothyroidism, proteinuria, and problems at the joint or ankle joint 4. Those who have cerebrovascular disease, unstable angina, or transient ischemic attack, or those who have had coronary artery bypass graft or coronary angioplasty; 5. Patients who may develop edema by concomitant drugs at screening: - Drugs that constrict intrarenal blood vessels (e.g. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclosporine, etc.); - Drugs that dilate arterioles (e.g. vasodilators, etc.); - Drugs that increase sodium reabsorption in the kidneys (e.g. steroids, etc.); - Drugs that damage capillaries (e.g. interleukin-2, etc.); - Glitazone-based drugs for diabetes 6. Those who show hypersensitive reaction* to the investigational product; 7. Those who are taking the following drugs that may cause drug interactions: - Drugs that may change the plasma concentration of amlodipine [e.g. CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. rifampicin, St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum), etc.); - Drugs that may increase the antihypertensive action [e.g. other antihypertensives (calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, ACEi, ARB, alpha blockers, diuretics, nitroglycerin), tricyclic antidepressants (amitriptyline, desipramine, imipramine, nortriptyline, protriptyline, trimipramine, etc.), nitrate formulation, baclofen, pioglitazone, sildenafil, etc.]; - Systemic corticosteroids (fluocinolone, triamcinolone), etc.: Local application allowed; - Drugs that may increase the inhibitory action of muscle contraction [e.g. antiarrhythmics (amiodarone, quinidine, etc.); - Drugs that may cause ventricular spasms (e.g. intravenous administration of dantrolene and verapamil); - Drugs that may increase the risk of hypotension [e.g. CYP3A4 inhibitors (clarithromycin), etc.] 8. Patients in a state of chronic inflammation requiring chronic anti-inflammatory treatment; 9. Those who have participated in other interventional clinical studies within 6 months of screening; 10. Those who have been diagnosed as having malignant tumors within 5 years of screening; 11. Those who showed clinically significant abnormal results in electrocardiogram and laboratory tests at screening; 12. Those who are pregnant or lactating, or have been confirmed as being pregnant through the Urine HCG test; 13. Those who have been judged to be inappropriate to participate in the clinical study by the principal investigator or subinvestigator. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | Korea University Guro Hospital | Seoul |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Ahn-Gook Pharmaceuticals Co.,Ltd | Dt&Sanomedics, Korea University Guro Hospital |
Korea, Republic of,
Brown NJ, Vaughan DE. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Circulation. 1998 Apr 14;97(14):1411-20. Review. — View Citation
Elliott WJ, Meyer PM. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):201-7. Erratum in: Lancet. 2007 May 5;369(9572):1518. — View Citation
Galappatthy P, Waniganayake YC, Sabeer MI, Wijethunga TJ, Galappatthy GK, Ekanayaka RA. Leg edema with (S)-amlodipine vs conventional amlodipine given in triple therapy for hypertension: a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0350-z. — View Citation
Kim SA, Park S, Chung N, Lim DS, Yang JY, Oh BH, Tahk SJ, Ahn TH. Efficacy and safety profiles of a new S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate formulation versus racemic amlodipine besylate in adult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase III, noninferiority clinical trial. Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):845-57. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.013. — View Citation
Liu F, Qiu M, Zhai SD. Tolerability and effectiveness of (S)-amlodipine compared with racemic amlodipine in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2010 Feb;71(1):1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2010.02.005. — View Citation
Makani H, Bangalore S, Romero J, Htyte N, Berrios RS, Makwana H, Messerli FH. Peripheral edema associated with calcium channel blockers: incidence and withdrawal rate--a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Hypertens. 2011 Jul;29(7):1270-80. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283472643. — View Citation
Messerli FH. Vasodilatory edema: a common side effect of antihypertensive therapy. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002 Nov;4(6):479-82. Review. — View Citation
Pathak L, Hiremath, Kerkar PG, Manade VG. Multicentric, clinical trial of S-Amlodipine 2.5 mg versus Amlodipine 5 mg in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension--a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004 Mar;52:197-202. — View Citation
Pedrinelli R, Dell'Omo G, Melillo E, Mariani M. Amlodipine, enalapril, and dependent leg edema in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2000 Feb;35(2):621-5. — View Citation
Schoeller DA, Alon A, Manekas D, Mixson LA, Lasseter KC, Noonan GP, Bolognese JA, Heymsfield SB, Beals CR, Nunes I. Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2012 Mar;34(3):580-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Mar 3. — View Citation
Sener D, Halil M, Yavuz BB, Cankurtaran M, Ariogul S. Anasarca edema with amlodipine treatment. Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Apr;39(4):761-3. Epub 2005 Feb 22. — View Citation
* Note: There are 11 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The variance in edema index [Extracellular water (ECW) / total body water (TBW)] using Inbody measurement between groups at week 12, compared to the baseline. | Descriptive statistics (number of observation subjects, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum) are summarized by treatment group. Depending on whether there is a difference in the variance between treatment groups (S-amlodipine group, Amlodipine group) that satisfies the normality assumption, analysis is made using either two sample t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test. | Edema indexs (ECW/TBW) are measured at week 4, 8, 12 of treatment. | |
Secondary | The variance in edema index between groups at weeks 4 and 8, compared to the baseline | Descriptive statistics (number of observation subjects, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum) are summarized by treatment group. Depending on whether there is a difference in the variance between treatment groups (S-amlodipine group, Amlodipine group) that satisfies the normality assumption, analysis is made using either two sample t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test. | Edema indexs (ECW/TBW) are measured at week 4, 8, 12 of treatment. | |
Secondary | The variance in ankle size (mean size of both ankles using a medical tape measure) between groups at weeks 4, 8, and 12, compared to the baseline. | Mean size of both anckles are tape-measured using medical tape. | Ankel sizes are measured in at week 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. | |
Secondary | The variance in edema index (extracellular moisture per site/water per site) by site (body, right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, left leg) between groups at weeks 4, 8, and 12, compared to the baseline. | Descriptive statistics (number of observation subjects, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum) are summarized by site(body, right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, left leg) and treatment group. Depending on whether there is a difference in the variance between treatment groups (S-amlodipine group, Amlodipine group) that satisfies the normality assumption, analysis is made using either two sample t-test or Wilcoxon's rank sum test. | Edema indexs (ECW/TBW) by site (body, right arm, left arm, trunk, right leg, left leg) are measured at the week 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. | |
Secondary | The variance in blood pressure between groups at weeks 4, 8, and 12, compared to the baseline. | Blood pressure is measured at five-minute intervals after a five-minute rest while seated; three measurements are made for one arm and the SBP and DBP values at each measurement are collected and calculated to derive the mean value. | Blood pressure are measured at week 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03708601 -
Prognostic Risk of Patients With Essential Hypertension for Cardiovascular Events (PROSPECT)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05503953 -
Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AGSAVI in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled With AGLS
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05526703 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of D064 and D701 Combination Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06395194 -
Effects of Valsartan vs Amlodipine and Low BP on Kidney Outcomes in Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06418074 -
Effects of Exogenous Ketosis on Renal Function, Renal Perfusion, and Sodium Excretory Capacity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02890173 -
Study of CS-3150 in Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02944734 -
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Dose-Finding in Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02096939 -
Microvascular Function in Primary Aldosteronism
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT01956786 -
Efficacy of Amlodipine-Folic Acid Tablets on Reduction of Blood Pressure and Plasma Homocysteine
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02553512 -
Helius in Hypertension-I: The UK Hypertension Registry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01198249 -
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Between Single and Concomitant Administrations of Amlodipine, Losartan, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With (Pre)Hypertension
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01001572 -
Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00380289 -
Early Metabolic Changes With Thiazide or Beta Blocker Therapy for Essential Hypertension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00139698 -
Olmesartan Alone or in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00288184 -
Uric Acid in Essential Hypertension in Children
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01289886 -
Fimasartan (BR-A-657) Single Oral Dose in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06041529 -
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TEL/AML/CTD in Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04470830 -
A Study for PMS of AZL-M/CLD FDC in the Treatment of Participants With Essential HTN in South Korea
|
||
Completed |
NCT00758524 -
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 in Participants With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05109013 -
Juvenile Essential Arterial Hypertension and Vascular Function
|