View clinical trials related to End Stage Renal Disease.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of renal transplantation on fluid overload and its consequence on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, in patients with end stage chronic kidney disease. It aims further to investigate the relationship between overhydration, nocturnal rostral fluid shift and the severity of sleep apnea.
Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS) is a common neuropathic disorder in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Study Design: Because micronutrient depletion has been associated with RLS in ESRD and because the vitamin biotin is dialyzable, the investigators examined the relationship between biotin status and RLS in ESRD. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of biotin deficiency in those with and without RLS (Study 1) and to determine the effect of biotin supplementation on RLS symptoms (Study 2) in patients receiving chronic dialysis due to ESRD.
Uremic pruritus remains one of the most frustrating and potentially disabling symptoms in patients with end stage renal disease. It affect up to 90 percent of patients with end stage renal disease. Several hypotheses have been postulated for the possible underlying etiology, but none is conclusive. Aside from kidney transplantation, which is only definitive treatment, therapeutic approaches have largely been empirical, and no firm evident‐base treatments are available. The main goal of therapy remains to minimize severity of pruritus. In Iranian traditional medicine Cassia senna L. is used for healing uremic pruritus . In this study investigators considered to evaluate effect of Cassia senna L. in uremic pruritus by a double blind placebo control clinical trial. It is hypothesized that oral Cassia senna L. may attenuate uremic pruritus by decreasing serum IL‐2, IFN-γ and TNF‐α.
Aim: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hemodialysis due to diabetic nephropathy exhibit a high risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD). Preliminary data suggest that beta-blocker treatment may reduce arrhythmias and mortality in this high-risk population. However, no results from large-scale clinical outcome trials with beta-blockers exist in this patient group and a broad, scientifically unapproved use of beta-blocker treatment may not be justified due to potential harmful side-effects such as AV-block or hypotension. In addition, we are lacking identified ECG surrogate parameters for SCD in this high-risk population and on the occurrence of arrhythmias in temporary relationship to hemodialysis sessions. Therefore, the present study will identify surrogate parameters of SCD in hemodialysis patients with T2DM and in an interventional trial investigate the suppressive effect of beta-blockers on these identified ECG markers.
1. Purpose: to investigate the effect of bioimpedance analysis(BIA) guided fluid management versus experiential way on clinical outcome in peritoneal dialysis patients. 2. Design: prospective,randomized,controlled,single center study 3. Study hypothesis: Patients on peritoneal dialysis are frequently hypervolemic, which is associated with increasing hazard of death and cardiovascular events. Bioimpedance analysis is a safe, and easy way, which appears to be more useful and sensitive than other techniques for assessing volume status in dialysis patients. Therefore we hypothesize that more concise and strict fluid management guided by BIA may help to improve patients' survival, decrease cardiovascular events and hospitalization rate. 4. Objects: incident and prevalent patients with overhydration status. 1. anticipated cases:240 2. arms: all the patients are randomized into two arms.(BIA group/clinical group) 3. observational time:12 months 5. Primary Outcome: all cause mortality. Secondary Outcomes: technique survival, cardiovascular events, peritonitis, residual renal function.
Kidney failure is a devastating illness requiring treatment with dialysis or transplantation to preserve life. Individuals unable to have transplants are managed by peritoneal dialysis (PD)or haemodialysis (HD). PD involves the placement of a soft, flexible plastic tube (catheter) into the abdomen, allowing dialysis fluid to be drained in and out of the peritoneal cavity. This catheter exits from a hole in the abdomen and occasionally patients can have complications at this exit site. One possible complication is over-granulation. Over-granulation occurs as the wound attempts to heal and the skin around the exit site becomes red,'wet','bumpy' and stands 'proud' of the surrounding skin. An over-granulating exit site can lead to discomfort, pain, bleeding and harbour infection. More serious complications include dialysis failure, sepsis and death. There are several ways to treat over-granulation but there is limited research evidence to demonstrate which treatment is best. The study aims to compare current standard treatment which involves the application of silver nitrate by qualified nursing staff to chemically burn the tissue away, with an alternative treatment which involves the application of steroid impregnated tape to the area of over-granulating tissue by the patient themselves.
Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have elevated serum phosphate (P) levels have significantly higher mortality rates compared to those with normal P. In patients receiving conventional dialysis regimens, serum P may be lowered through dietary intervention and use of P binders, though these have potentially important side effects and may adversely impact quality of life. Whether lowering P, and / or targeting specific P levels improve survival and clinical outcomes is unknown. Despite this uncertainty, over 90% of patients with ESRD receive P lowering therapy and guidelines for the care of patients with ESRD are increasingly calling for more aggressive phosphate lowering. This intensive P lowering results in extra medications (and their associated side-effects), and higher health care costs. We are uncertain whether the intensification of P control results in measurable benefits to patients with ESRD. The overall goal of this pilot trial is to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial of intensive vs liberalized phosphate control among hemodialysis recipients.
Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In anemia of chronic kidney disease, patients suffer from low hemoglobin levels, which contribute to feelings of malaise and fatigue. The current accepted practice is often to administer erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), which act like the body's natural hormones to stimulate the production of red blood cells from bone marrow. Although ESAs are widely used in CKD, recent evidence suggests that they are not as safe as previously thought. In this study, we seek to test a decision aid to be used when a patient visits his or her nephrologist at Vanderbilt. The objective of the decision aid is to reduce patient confusion, improve their satisfaction with their care, improve their knowledge of kidney disease, and ultimately bring more clarity to patients about a controversial but ubiquitous drug. The decision aid will be about 1 page long and will include questions and information that might help the patient be more active and informed regarding the choice of a course of ESA therapy. We will ask patients to answer questions before and after their clinic visits regarding their satisfaction and confidence in their treatment and their knowledge of kidney disease; we will ask some of the same questions 3 months after the clinic visit. We will compare patients who are counseled using the decision aid to patients who are not. We anticipate total experiment running time to be approximately 5 months to recruit and follow up on all patients.
The purpose of this study is to establish the therapeutic equivalence of Gengraf® with the standard treatment Neoral® for a treatment period of 6 months in stable renal allograft transplant recipients with respect to drug levels, dosage, and acute graft rejection and other adverse events.
This study is a multicenter, non-randomized, retrospective study to collect long term (5 years post-transplant) clinical outcome data to test whether the results of the noninvasive immune monitoring test strategy performed in the parent study (CTOT-01, NCT00308802) in first six-month post-transplant is predictive of 5-year outcomes. Each center will complete a retrospective chart review for the data on patient survival, graft survival and renal function.