View clinical trials related to Epigastric Hernia.
Filter by:ABSTRACT Objective: To compare frequency of basal atelectasis in patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery who are provided pre-operative incentive spirometry versus those not provided pre-operative incentive spirometry
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety bilateral recto-intercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) in epigastric hernia.
Nationwide cohort study on women undergoing epigastric hernia repair
The aim was to evaluate outcomes after epigastric hernia repair in women on a nationwide basis. The primary outcome iss recurrence - secondary outcomes are readmission, operation for complication, risk factors for recurrence, and readmittance.
Ventral hernias can be repaired using a variety of techniques, with smaller defects often being amenable to minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. For many years, the standard of care MIS approach to ventral hernias has been the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) approach, in which a large piece of mesh is placed inside of the abdomen and fixed to the inner abdominal wall using a combination of sutures and/or mechanical tacks. For selected patients, the IPOM approach has demonstrated benefits over open repair, including decreased postoperative length of stay and decreased incidence of surgical site infection. However, concern regarding long-term outcomes of placing mesh inside the abdomen have spurred the search for alternate approaches to MIS ventral hernia repair. This includes the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach, in which the retromuscular plane is accessed and developed so a large piece of mesh may be implanted outside of the abdominal cavity. The theoretical benefits of this approach are that patients may experience reduced pain because mechanical mesh fixation is not required (as compared to traditional IPOM approaches in which mesh is fixed to the inner abdominal wall) and that mesh is kept outside of the abdominal cavity and away from the viscera, allowing use of less expensive, uncoated mesh and theoretically reducing risk for long-term mesh related complications. While popularity of eTEP has grown, literature published regarding this approach has been mostly retrospective, consists of relatively small series of patients, and suffers from selection bias. For the one prospective study of eTEP published by Radu, et al, there was no comparator arm. The investigators will conduct a registry-based randomized controlled trial comparing MIS approaches for repair of small to medium-sized ventral hernias, specifically eTEP versus IPOM. This will occur through the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). Our hypotheses are multiple: 1) Patients with ventral hernias undergoing eTEP will experience a 30% decrease in pain scores by postoperative day 1 compared to patients undergoing IPOM; 2) eTEP will be associated with higher median direct costs per case versus IPOM; 3) eTEP will be associated with equivalent 1-year hernia recurrence rates versus IPOM; 4) eTEP will be associated with significantly increased intraoperative surgeon workload compared to IPOM.
Ventral hernias, such as umbilical, epigastric and trocar-site hernias, are best repaired with abdominal wall reinforcement by mesh implantation. Mesh-devices using a dual-sided mesh technology have been developed for the specific indication of small ventral hernias; this technique is very attractive because the mesh can be introduced through a nearly invisible scar in the umbilicus. The dual layer of the mesh inhibits the formation of adhesions of the viscera to the mesh so, if wanted, it can be positioned in a intraperitoneal position. No literature is available on the adequate size of mesh needed to repair a hernia defect of an umbilical or epigastric hernia. Very small hernias are now often enlarged for repair with a large mesh device. Small hernias might benefit of repair with a small mesh device so no enlargement of the defect is necessary Larger hernias might benefit from a larger mesh size to have more overlap of the mesh beyond the hernia defect. The SITUP-trial was a prospective cohort study who was designed to explore the efficacy of C-QUR V-Patch of different sizes for the different sizes of hernia defects. The study was stopped prematurely because of the perception of an unacceptably high rate of mesh infection. This new study will retrospectively examine the incidence of mesh infection in all ventral hernias repaired with a C-QUR V-Patch. Collection of patient data was done using the Eura-HS registry.
Umbilical and epigastric hernia repairs are common and performed by numerous surgical techniques. Considering that the hernia repairs in general are relatively small and simple procedures there are disproportionate poor results. The aim of present study is to determine surgical risk factors for readmission after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair and to report risk factors for later reoperation for recurrence.
Primary ventral hernias, such as umbilical and epigastric hernias, are best repaired with abdominal wall reinforcement by mesh implantation. Mesh-devices using a dual-sided mesh technology have been developed for the specific indication of small ventral hernias; this technique is very attractive because the mesh can be introduced through a nearly invisible scar in the umbilicus. The dual layer of the mesh inhibits the formation of adhesions of the viscera to the mesh so, if wanted, it can be positioned in a intraperitoneal position. No literature is available on the adequate size of mesh needed to repair a hernia defect of an umbilical or epigastric hernia. Very small hernias are now often enlarged for repair with a large mesh device. Small hernias might benefit of repair with a small mesh device so no enlargement of the defect is necessary Larger hernias might benefit from a larger mesh size to have more overlap of the mesh beyond the hernia defect. With this prospective cohort study the investigators want to explore the efficacy of C-QUR V-Patch of different sizes for the different sizes of hernia defects.