Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05228288
Other study ID # COVALENT
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date March 28, 2022
Est. completion date February 28, 2024

Study information

Verified date April 2023
Source Wuerzburg University Hospital
Contact Benedikt Schmid, MD, PhD
Phone +49 931 201 30309
Email schmid_b@ukw.de
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

COVALENT is a randomized, controlled, multi-center study that aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of endotracheal intubation in an operative setting comparing video-assisted laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy.


Description:

Data on the routine use of video-assisted laryngoscopy in peri-operative intubations are rather inconsistent and ambiguous, in part due to small study populations and non-uniform outcome measures in past trials. Failed or prolonged intubation procedures are a reason for relevant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine whether video-assisted laryngoscopy (irrespective of the shape of the blade) is non-inferior to the standard method of direct laryngoscopy with respect to the first-pass success rate. Furthermore, validated tools from the field of human factors will be applied to examine within-team communication and task load during this critical medical procedure.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 2600
Est. completion date February 28, 2024
Est. primary completion date February 28, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Adult, legally competent patients - Scheduled for elective, non-cardiac surgical procedure - Need for endotracheal intubation as determined during the premedication visit - Informed consent - Care providers performing the intubation have at least one year of training in anesthesiology and experience in the use of VAL Exclusion Criteria: - Lack of ability to give consent - Previous participation in this study - Pregnancy - Need for fiberoptic intubation - Patients scheduled for bariatric surgery - Any circumstance that will lead the anesthesiologist(s) in charge to believe that random assignment of a laryngoscopy instrument may compromise patient safety during induction of anesthesia

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Conventional direct laryngoscopy (CDL)
This procedure is considered the gold standard for endotracheal intubation and is routinely used in the peri-operative setting as well as in intensive care and emergency medicine.
Video assisted laryngoscopy with Macintosh-shaped blade (M-VAL)
This device is implemented in most german hospitals and used when conventional direct laryngoscopy is not sufficient. By positioning the camera at the tip of the blade, the achievable field of view onto the glottic plane is improved.
Video assisted laryngoscopy with hyper-angulated blade (H-VAL)
The hyper-angulated blades are often used as a backup instrument when a view of the glottic plane cannot be achieved with the Macintosh blade due to anatomic abnormalities, even with a video-assisted laryngoscope.

Locations

Country Name City State
Germany University Hospital Wuerzburg Würzburg

Sponsors (3)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Wuerzburg University Hospital University Hospital, Aachen, University Hospital, Bonn

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Germany, 

References & Publications (1)

Park SY, Kim SH, Lee AR, Cho SH, Chae WS, Jin HC, Lee JS, Kim YI. Prophylactic effect of dexamethasone in reducing postoperative sore throat. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Jan;58(1):15-9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.1.15. Epub 2010 Jan 31. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Successful intubation The primary endpoint is the successful intubation at first attempt as a dichotomous (successful/unsuccessful) event. The first attempt begins with the laryngoscope spatula passing the patient's row of teeth. The attempt is considered unsuccessful if a complete retraction of the laryngoscope or the endotracheal tube from the oropharynx is necessary for any reason (need for bag ventilation, change of device, change of patient position, change in the curvature of the stylet, etc.). Maneuvers that can be performed during laryngoscopy, such as BURP (backward, upward, rightward pressure) or reclining the head, which end with successful intubation, count towards the first attempt. During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient until the first capnographic end-expiratory carbon dioxide [CO2] detection is possible)
Secondary Parameters regarding the duration of the intervention Time to intubation and time to glottis view (as announced by the anesthesist) During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Cormack & Lehane grade Grade 1 (full view of glottis), Grade 2a (partial view of glottis), Grade 2b (view only of posterior extremity of glottis or arytenoid cartilages), Grade 3 (view of epiglottis, none of the glottis), Grade 4 (neither view of glottis nor epiglottis) During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Intubation success Total number of attempts. Number of attempts using the randomized device. Success rate of intubation attempts regarding the respective device. During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient for the first time until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Influence of the device on human factors during the intervention Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale, NASA-TLX (National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Task Load Index) During the period of intubation and maintenance of anesthesia
Secondary Complications: occurrence of one or more of the following Drop of SpO2 (oxygen saturation) below 90%. Regurgitation as announced by the anesthetist. Need for bronchoscopy due to suspected aspiration. Dental injury or dental clicks upon contact with the blade. Soft tissue injuries as detected by blood on the blade. Visible swelling. Bleeding or other injury of the lips. Need for resuscitation (administration of adrenalin, chest compressions, defibrillation or any combination thereof). Death. Occurence of any adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE). During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient for the first time until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Need for auxiliary devices or switch of laryngoscopy device Manœuvres to optimize intubation conditions after the first attempt at intubation has started. Switch to alternate laryngoscopy device. Switch of the anesthetists. Switch of airway device During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient for the first time until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Relevant vital parameters during the intervention Baseline SpO2 and lowest SpO2 During the period of intubation (as soon as the laryngoscope blade passes the teeth row of the patient for the first time until the first capnographic end-expiratory CO2 detection is possible)
Secondary Post-operative sore throat, coughing or hoarseness Post-operative sore throat, coughing or hoarseness, according to the "Scoring System for Sore Throat, Cough, and Hoarseness" by Park et al. This outcome will not be assessed in patients who continue to be invasively ventilated > 2 hours after surgery. End of surgery until two hours after the end of surgery
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT06089187 - Comparing Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery: Saline vs. Air Inflation N/A
Completed NCT02395445 - A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management N/A
Completed NCT02395432 - A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway N/A
Unknown status NCT01041066 - Nicardipine Versus Labetalol During Intubation N/A
Completed NCT03284892 - Screening and Intervention of Postextubation Dysphagia N/A
Recruiting NCT02395406 - A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Difficult Airway Management N/A
Recruiting NCT02395419 - A Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using the Totaltrack vs the Airtraq Laryngoscope in Routine Airway Management N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT02277015 - Intubation During Pediatric Resuscitation N/A
Completed NCT01169467 - Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Using Precedex and Other Sedatives Phase 3
Completed NCT00620386 - Endotracheal Intubation Using Bonfils Fibrescope Without Neuromuscular Blockade Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT05069844 - Preoperative Gum Chewing for Different Durations to Prevent Sore Throat After Endotracheal Intubation N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05620108 - Intubating Conditions of Neuromuscular Blockade N/A
Completed NCT02741921 - Conventional Double-lumen Tube vs VivaSight DL N/A
Recruiting NCT02295657 - Double Lumen Tube Intubation N/A
Completed NCT01488370 - Comparison of 2 Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation in Children Younger Than 2 Years Old N/A
Recruiting NCT01006668 - Sevoflurane Versus Propofol for Intubation in Neonatal Intensive Care Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04483895 - Comparison Between the Oro-Helical Length Technique and the 7-8-9 Rule in Determination of the Ideal Endotracheal Tube Insertion Depth in Neonates N/A
Completed NCT04141267 - Inhaled Sedation Using the Anesthetic-conserving Device ( ANACONDA) in Prehospital Emergency Medecine.
Completed NCT01490580 - Premedication Trial for Tracheal Intubation of the NEOnate Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT03878797 - The Depth of Endotracheal Tube Insertion

External Links