View clinical trials related to Endometriosis.
Filter by:Assess the psychometric properties of the Endometriosis Symptom Diary (ESD) and the Endometriosis Impact Scale (EIS) and provide evidence whether the PRO measures are reliable, valid and able to detect changes over time in approximately 250 patients with mild, moderate or severe endometriosis confirmed by laparoscopy.
This is a Phase II, multicentre, randomised, two-arm, parallel group ,double-blind, placebo controlled, study to investigate the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the steroid sulfatase inhibitor PGL2001 with concomitant, continuous NETA administration for the treatment of pain symptoms suggestive of endometriosis. The target population will be women of reproductive age with symptoms suggestive of endometriosis.
This is a prospective, three-part (Part A1, Part A2 and Part B),Phase II study investigating the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the JNK inhibitor PGL5001 orally administered for up to 5 months with concomitant DMPA administration for the treatment of laparoscopically diagnosed inflammatory endometriosis. The part A1 is open-label, the parts A2 and B are double-blind. The target population will be women of reproductive age and suffering from newly diagnosed peritoneal and/or ovarian endometriosis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KLH-2109 in patients with endometriosis.
The study compares the effect of bilateral salpingectomy associated with conservative hysterectomy on ovarian function to the standard hysterectomy with conservation of both ovaries and tubes in terms of hormone assays, ovarian ultrasound evaluation, complications, quality of life.
A randomized study evaluating the safety and efficacy of elagolix in the management of moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain in adult premenopausal female participants.
Objective: To compare loss of ovarian parenchyma following ovarian endometrioma ablation using the PlasmaJet system versus cystectomy, using postoperative examination by 3D ultrasound. Design: Prospective comparative study. Setting: Two experienced surgeons practicing in two University tertiary referral centers. Patients: Fifty women with no previous history of ovarian surgery managed for unilateral ovarian endometrioma > 30 mm in diameter. Interventions: Endometrioma ablation by plasma energy using the PlasmaJet system and ovarian tissue sparing cystectomy. Main Outcome Measures: 3D ultrasound assessment of postoperative reduction in ovarian volume and antral follicle count (AFC) .
The study aims to collect data on the influence of a treatment with Visanne (Dienogest 2mg/d) on the Endometriosis related quality of life. These data will be collected using a special patient questionnaire (Endometriosis Health Profile 5, EHP-5). The study will also be used to describe the basic disease status and demographic characteristics of patients searching treatment by a gynecologist because of their endometriosis. In addition, the study will give insight into the typical diagnostic measures the physicians in different countries are using in the field of endometriosis.
Approximately 600,000 women undergo hysterectomy each year in the United States, of which 12% are laparoscopic. The most common indications for hysterectomy are: symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (40.7%), endometriosis (17.7%), and prolapse (14.5%). The first total laparoscopic hysterectomy was performed by Reich et al in 1988. Many studies have proven that laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with lower preoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and shorter recovery times than abdominal hysterectomy. The literature has also shown the complication rates for laparoscopic cases are similar to open procedures in the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice state that laparoscopic hysterectomy is an alternative to abdominal hysterectomy for those patients in whom vaginal hysterectomy is not indicated or feasible. The ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice site multiple advantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy to abdominal hysterectomy including faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, less blood loss, and fewer abdominal wall/wound infections. Despite the recommendations of ACOG for a more minimally invasive approach, 66% of all hysterectomies are performed abdominally. Key reasons for the lag in utilization of laparoscopic techniques are the technical obstacles of performing minimally invasive hysterectomies. Robotic technology has emerged as a means to decrease the learning curve and increase the availability of minimally invasive surgery to patients. A current review of the literature reveals no randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy. The investigator's aim is to address this void. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy is equivalent to Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with respect to operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay. The investigator's secondary objective was to assess the cost, morbidity, and mortality of each procedure.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the administration of an analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) during the three months prior to the performing of an IVF may improve the response to ovarian stimulation, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate in patients with endometriosis/ endometriomas.