View clinical trials related to Endometrial Neoplasms.
Filter by:Comparison of the effectiveness metformin versus placebo for deceasing proliferative marker Ki-67 expression in endometrial tumours when given for 4 weeks before hysterectomy in endometrial cancer cells.
This study seeks to determine the effectiveness of Rucaparib as maintenance therapy for metastatic and recurrent endometrial cancer, after 1-2 prior lines of therapy.
The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to demonstrate that a nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention significantly improves sexual recovery and functioning among gynaecological cancer (GC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT), compared with usual care (i.e., oral information by a nurse or doctor and written information). Women with GC (n=220) who receive RT in one of the participating Dutch GC centres (n=9) will be randomized to either the sexual rehabilitation intervention (n= 110) or usual care (n= 110), stratified for combined RTBT vs. RT alone, and for having a partner (yes/no). Women are eligible for participation if they: have been diagnosed with either cervical, endometrial, or vaginal cancer; are treated with radiotherapy; are 18 years or older; and wish to retain their sexual activity on the short or long term. The intervention consists of four one-hour sessions at 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months after RT. Women who received RTBT will receive an additional appointment with the nurse (2 months after RTBT) to promote regular use of vaginal dilators in order to prevent stenosis. Participants are requested to complete questionnaires at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. The primary endpoint is sexual functioning at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include vaginal symptoms and body concerns, fear of coital and non-coital sexual activity, sexual distress, treatment-related distress, generic health-related quality of life, psychological distress, and relationship dissatisfaction. Hypothesis: The investigators expect women who receive the nurse-led sexual rehabilitation programme to report a greater improvement in sexual functioning from immediate post-radiotherapy to 1 year post-radiotherapy than women in the control group.
Atezolizumab is an engineered humanised monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that binds selectively to PD-L1 and prevents its interaction with PD-1 and B7-1. In May 2016 atezolizumab was approved by the FDA for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have disease progression during or following any platinum-containing chemotherapy, or within 12 months of receiving chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant) or after surgery (adjuvant); in October 2016 it was approved by the FDA for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy, and have progressed on an appropriate FDA-approved targeted therapy if their tumor has EGFR or ALK gene abnormalities. Finally, in April 2017 atezolizumab was granted accelerated approval by FDA for the first-line treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are not eligible for cisplatin chemotherapy. Combinations of atezolizumab with chemotherapeutic agents and/or targeted therapies were studied in different solid tumors such as melanoma, NSCLC, renal cell carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma. From these studies the AE profile of atezolizumab combinations were consistent with that of the individual agents. Finally, preliminary results of a Phase Ia study of Atezolizumab (NCT01375842) monotherapy in relapsed endometrial cancer were reported as abstract at ASCO 2017. Fifteen patients were evaluated for safety and efficacy with a minimum follow-up of 11.2 months. No G4-5 related AEs occurred. Regarding efficacy ORR was 13% [2/15] by RECIST. Atezolizumab seemed to have a favorable safety profile, with durable clinical benefit in some patients. Further studies with atezolizumab are warranted given its promising results in advanced endometrial cancer and the limited efficacy of current treatment options.
The hypothesis of the study is that high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) can be used safely to treat rectal and pelvic cancer. The study consists of two trials exploring the use of HIFU in rectal and pelvic cancer to establish the safety and potential efficacy of HIFU in this instance. The first trial is a feasibility study looking at patients with early rectal cancer. We aim to recruit thirty patients with early rectal cancer who are due to undergo an operation to remove their cancer. After recruiting and consenting them for the trial, we will treat their rectal cancer with HIFU. Approximately one week after treatment they will undergo their normal cancer operation. This will allow us to demonstrate the safety of HIFU as a treatment for rectal cancer and evaluate the changes in rectal and surrounding tissue under the microscope after the cancer is treated with HIFU. In addition, we will monitor patients for any complications and the impact this treatment has on their quality of life. We will monitor the response of various markers for cancer with blood tests. The second trial aims to evaluate the treatment of a cohort of patients with inoperable rectal cancer. We aim to recruit thirty patients with either inoperable pelvic cancers - rectal, cervical or endometrial, or cancers that have returned after previous operations. We will offer these patients treatment of their cancer using HIFU. We will monitor the symptoms they experience and impact on their quality of life both before and at multiple time points after the treatment with HIFU. We will compare MRI scans before and after treatment to evaluate the effect HIFU has in reducing the size of the cancer. We hope to show that using HIFU in this group of patients can be both effective and lead to an improvement in both their symptoms and quality of life.
This phase Ib trial studies the best dose and side effects of niraparib and copanlisib in treating patients with endometrial, ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer that has come back. Niraparib and copanlisib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
To date, cost-utility, safety, and feasibility of ambulatory surgery versus traditional pathway in the management of endometrial cancer have never been prospectively assessed. The investigators hypothesize that ambulatory surgery versus standard pathway in the management of endometrial cancer is both safe, feasible and may impact on patient health-related quality of life. The main objective of the study is to assess the cost-utility of ambulatory surgery versus standard pathway in the management of endometrial cancer. A total of 252 consecutive, eligible, consenting patients with a low- and intermediate-risk early stage endometrial cancer will be enrolled from various clinical practice sites within France and patient will randomly be assigned to one of the two surgical management pathways: ambulatory pathway versus standard pathway.
This is a phase 1/phase 2a study of the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitor (nivolumab) in combination with the PARP inhibitor (rucaparib) for patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and metastatic/recurrent endometrial cancer. In the phase 1 portion, the safety of the combination dosing will be determined. If the combination dosing is determined to be safe and feasible, the study will move onto phase 2a. In the phase 2a portion, participants will be randomized to receive either: rucaparib alone, nivolumab alone, or combination therapy (rucaparib and nivolumab).
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the developed countries and is the fifth most common cancer among women worldwide. Typically present well or moderately differentiated, early stage endometrioid histotype with a prognosis usually favorable. Pelvic lymph nodes (LNs) represent the most common site of extra-uterine disease in patients with clinical early stage disease and the role of lymphadenectomy in early stage EC has been one of the major controversies in gynecology oncology. Lymphadenectomy doesn't improve survival or reduce disease recurrence although supported to provide prognostic information and allowing tailoring of adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, lymphadenectomy is not performed without serious short-term and long-term morbidity. Although surgical staging is the most accurate and standard method to determine LNs involvement, the introduction in clinical practice of a non-invasive modality that allows an accurate staging of EC would be essential. Available evidence report the accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of LN metastasis in EC with a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 94.7%. This prospective comparative analysis between PET/CT, histological findings, and follow up data will be performed to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of integrated PET/CT for nodal staging of EC per patient and per LN chain analyses, in women affected by intermediate (grade 1 and 2 endometrioid lesions with deep myometrial invasion > 50% or grade 3 endometrioid lesion with < 50% myometrial invasion) or high risk (grade 3 endometrioid lesion with deep myometrial invasion > 50% or non-endometrioid histotype) early-stage EC. Furthermore, the preoperative classification of EC in intermediate and high-risk class will allow to investigate its prognostic value.
The COPELIA trial is evaluating two new tablet medications in endometrial cancer for the first time. It will include 129 women aged 16 years or older with advanced endometrial cancer whose cancer has worsened after their initial chemotherapy treatment. Participants will be allocated at random to one of three groups: 1. The first group (Arm 1) will receive a standard (routine) treatment for patients with endometrial cancer known as paclitaxel. This is a chemotherapy drug that is routinely used to treat patients with different cancers including ovarian, breast, lung and endometrial cancer. Paclitaxel works by stopping the growth of cancer cells. 2. The second group (Arm 2) will receive the standard paclitaxel treatment once a week in addition to a new drug called cediranib. Cediranib is a tablet medication and works by blocking new blood vessel formation. Cediranib has been tested in women with endometrial cancer before but not alongside chemotherapy treatment. 3. The third group (Arm 3) will receive two new tablet medications, cediranib and olaparib. Olaparib works by preventing cancer cells repairing DNA effectively. The use of olaparib and cediranib together has been shown to be effective in a common type of ovarian cancer but has not been evaluated as a treatment for endometrial cancer before. The main objectives of the COPELIA trial are to work out: 1. Whether the two new treatments, cediranib-paclitaxel (Arm 2) and cediranib-olaparib (Arm 3) are more effective at controlling endometrial cancer than standard paclitaxel chemotherapy (Arm 1) 2. Whether the two new treatments cause more or fewer side-effects than standard chemotherapy 3. How each of these treatments impact on the daily life of women receiving the treatment by asking trial participants to regularly complete quality of life questionnaires 4. Whether we can learn how these treatments work in women with endometrial cancer by taking some additional blood tests for research.