Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05657067
Other study ID # 2022-CP-15102
Secondary ID 2022-CP-15102
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 26, 2022
Est. completion date June 30, 2026

Study information

Verified date June 2024
Source VU University of Amsterdam
Contact Henk Jan Conradi, PhD
Phone +31(0)205258606
Email h.j.conradi@uva.nl
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The goal of this clinical pilot study is to assess effectiveness and feasilibity of structured Emotionally Focused Family Therapy (EFFT) for parents and adolescents. Participants will fill out questionnaires before, during and after the EFFT treatment Finally, feasibility will be assessed by semi-structured interviews.


Description:

Background The prevalence of mental health problems of children and adolescents worldwide is substantial with 10-20%. Attachment related emotion regulation is considered an important transdiagnostic process underlying mental health problems in adolescents. Emotionally Focused Family Therapy (EFFT) aims at the development of secure attachment between parents and their children in order to reduce the child's vulnerability for mental health problems and enhance resilience. Intervention The current pilot study is a first test of the newly developed protocol of structured EFFT. It consists of 4 phases and 16-21 sessions: phase 1 (1-2 sessions with the whole family) reframing the individual adolescent's problem as related to insecure attachment relations with the parents; phase 2A (4-6 sessions with the parents) and phase 2B (3 sessions with the adolescent) are delivered in parallel fashion and aim to prepare them to phase 3 by exploring insecure attachment relations and unfulfilled attachment needs; phase 3 (3 sessions with parents and adolescent) is focused on development of secure attachment relations between parents and adolescent; phase 4 (3 sessions with the whole family) consolidation of secure attachment and additional interventions for residual psychopathology; and finally a booster session with the whole family. Treatment adherence will be assessed with a check list by independent raters of sound recordings of random sessions. Design and method A within-subjects design, without randomized control group, with three waves will be applied: (1) waiting period of 2 months, (2) treatment phase 3-4 months, and (3) 2 months follow-up period concluded with a booster session. Comparing change during the waiting period vs. change during treatment will provide a clear indication of spontaneous remission vs. treatment-related change. The study will use a multi-method approach: quantitative for the effectiveness part (multilevel analyses of questionnaires) and qualitative for the feasibility part (semi-structured interviews). Treatment adherence will be assessed with sound recording of random sessions. Hypotheses Concerning the effectiveness of structured EFFT the researchers anticipate that, if limited power of this pilot study yields significant differences, outcomes will show: 1. no, or less change during the waiting period compared with the treatment phase; 2. gain during the treatment phase; 3. and substantial maintenance during follow-up. Hypotheses will be tested with multi-level analyses. Feasibility will be explored.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 15
Est. completion date June 30, 2026
Est. primary completion date June 30, 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 12 Years to 18 Years
Eligibility Inclusion criteria: For this pilot study we will include families with 1. adolescents aged 12-18 years (the so called 'identified' patient), and 2. families coping with mild problems. Exclusion criteria: The latter means that we will exclude: 1. blended families because of the more complex loyalties that exist between children and stepparents, 2. families of which individual members cope with serious trauma such as sexual and physical abuse and severe neglect, and 3. families of which the parents or children are diagnosed with severe DSM disorders (substance abuse or psychosis).

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Behavioral:
Emotionally Focused Family Therapy (EFFT)
The rationale behind EFFT is that mental health problems in children and adolescents often originate and/or are exacerbated by negative interaction patterns rooted in insecure attachment bonds within families. Therefore, the main treatment goal of EFFT is the development of secure attachment between parents and their children.

Locations

Country Name City State
Netherlands Psychologiepraktijk Lenny Rodenbrug Bussum

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
VU University of Amsterdam Utrecht University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Netherlands, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change from the waiting period in Negative interaction patterns on the Relationship Dynamics Scale (RDS; Stanley et al., 2001) during and after EFFT. The RDS is a validated self-reported 4 item questionnaire assessing negative interaction patterns over the past 2 weeks. Possible total scores range from 4 (negligible) to 16 (often). Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Primary Change from the waiting period in Accessibility and responsiveness of the attachment figures on the Accessibility, Responsiveness, Emotional Engagement questionnaire (ARE; Johnson, 2008). The ARE is a validated self-reported 6 item questionnaire assessing accessibility and responsiveness of the attachment figures over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Primary Change from the waiting period in Discipline on the Discipline subscale of the Self-Efficacy for Parenting Tasks Index Toddler Scale (SEPTI; Coleman & Karraker, 2003). The Discipline 7 item subscale is part of the SEPTI a validated self-reported questionnaire assessing displine of the children by their partners over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Primary Change from the waiting period in Attachment between parents and adolescent and the parents as partners on the Experiences in Close Relationships - Relationship Structures questionnaire (ECR-RS; Fraley et al., 2011) The ECR is a validated self-reported 9 item questionnaire assessing Anxiety about rejection and abandonment and Avoidance of intimacy. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Primary Change from the waiting period in Relationship satisfaction between the parents as partners on the Couple Satisfaction Index (CSI; Funk & Rogge, 2007). The CSI is a validated self-reported 4 item questionnaire assessing relationship satisfaction over the past week. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Primary Change from the waiting period in the adolescent's Complaints on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1997). The SDQ is a validated self-reported 20 item questionnaire assessing adolescent's Complaints over the past month. Change will be assessed for: the waiting period (pre-treatment score - pre waiting period score), during EFFT (post treatment - pre treatment), during follow up (pre-booster session score - post -treatment score) and over the total study period. Through study completion, an average of 1 year per family: t1 = pre-waiting period; t2 = pre-treatment; t3 = pre-phase 3 (after 5-8 sessions); t4 = post treatment (after 16-21 sessions), t5 = pre-booster session (two months after final session)
Secondary Feasibility of structured EFFT. Feasibility will be assessed by semi-structured interviews. Two months after the final session, after the booster session has taken place. Semi-structured interviews will take place with the adolescent being interviewed separately from his or her parents.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05702086 - Making SPARX Fly in Nunavut: Pilot Testing an E-intervention for Boosting Resilience Against Youth Depression N/A
Completed NCT05684614 - Interoception and Emotion Regulation
Completed NCT05376397 - Testing THRIVE 365 for Black Sexual Minority Men (On The Daily) N/A
Completed NCT04110548 - Emotion and Craving Regulation Among Individuals With Internet Gaming Disorders N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05558527 - The Social Regulation of Threat-related Vigilance and Arousal N/A
Recruiting NCT03039387 - Effects of tDCS on Cognitive Control and Emotion Regulation in Depressed Patients N/A
Recruiting NCT06024083 - Skills Video Intervention for Chinese/Chinese Americans N/A
Recruiting NCT05949047 - Smartphone-based Cognitive Emotion Regulation Training for Unpaid Primary Caregivers of Persons With Alzheimer's Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT05867316 - Supplementing Brief Psychotherapy With a Mobile App N/A
Recruiting NCT05656001 - Neuro- and Biofeedback in Nonsuicidal Self-injury N/A
Recruiting NCT06033053 - Real-time Neurofeedback Training of Fronto-limbic Regions Functional Connectivity N/A
Recruiting NCT05390034 - Improving Emotion Regulation Flexibility: Testing the Efficacy of an Emotion Regulation Program in College Students N/A
Recruiting NCT06432959 - Incorporating Positive Affect Promoting Activities Into Cognitive Behavioral Therapies N/A
Recruiting NCT05131425 - Facing Your Fears: Adolescents With ASD and Intellectual Disability N/A
Recruiting NCT06049407 - Intervention on Socio-emotional Development and Well-being Through ICTs in Early Adulthood N/A
Completed NCT04999514 - Examining the Effects of Parenting Interventions on Children With Attention-Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder (AD/HD) and Their Parents N/A
Completed NCT05149066 - #KindGirlsInACTion: A Programme for the Promotion of Mental Health of Female Adolescents N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05264415 - Intergenerational Transmission of Traumatic Stress N/A
Recruiting NCT06458920 - Social Facilitation of Emotion Regulation in Adolescence N/A
Completed NCT03698591 - Testing a Neurocognitive Model of Distancing Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. N/A