View clinical trials related to Edema.
Filter by:The primary objectives of the study are to evaluate the safety and effect of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension and KPI-121 1.0% ophthalmic suspension on intraretinal or subretinal fluid secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion or Diabetic Macular Edema.
Currently, diabetic macular edema is treated is through injection of a medications such as off-label bevacizumab, which decreases the swelling in the retina. These injections are sometimes required monthly until the condition is controlled. Recently, there have been some new FDA approved treatments using laser that decrease the swelling. These approximately ten minute treatments do not require injections and don't cause permanent damage to the eye, and they may decrease the number of injections one needs to get to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to determine whether subvisible laser in combination with intravitreal bevacizumab is non-inferior compared to current standard of care (intravitreal bevacizumab alone) in achieving favorable outcomes for visual acuity, mean macular thickness, and patient quality of life, and has fewer needed intravitreal bevacizumab injections throughout the course of the 12 month study period.
Photocoagulation is the standard treatment in the focal EMCS, disrupts vascular leakage and allows the pigment epithelium remove the intraretinal fluid is effective in reducing the incidence of visual loss but can reduce contrast sensitivity and retinal sensitivity, the characteristics of the function can be reduced such as setting (location and stability) are relevant to the quality of the patient's vision parameters, reading comprehension, especially the ability, duration of diabetic macular edema, could have a significant impact on survival and / or the functional reserve of the macular cells subjected to mechanical and toxic stress-induced edema. It seems that in the treatment of patients with EMCS, photoreceptor damage occurs as a recent phenomenon, and can precede neurodegeneration retinal photoreceptor loss, whereby visual function can be decreased. An adjunctive treatment as Dorzolamide facilitating effect helping resorption of intraretinal fluid through EPR and reduce adverse events that is the loss of contrast sensitivity and retinal sensitivity, response time of photocoagulation treatment could be reduced to the patient, because the rate of resorption of intraretinal fluid is facilitated and thus the duration of the response, also could reduce damage to vision caused by the inadequacies of the photoreceptors during the evolution of macular edema avoiding moderate visual loss, there by increasing the quality of life in terms of improving the quality of vision in diabetic patients. In addition to obtaining a specific adjuvant treatment with photocoagulation is helpful for focal edema in diabetic and a new level using dorzolamide in retina Dorzolamide as adjunctive therapy after focal photocoagulation is more effective than placebo in improving visual function in patients with diabetic macular edema
Diabetic macular edema refers to swelling (fluid accumulation) in the center of the retina. The retina is like the film of a camera and is located in the back of the eye. This condition can develop in diabetics where swelling results from leaking of fluid from the blood vessels of the eye, into the center of the retina, the macula. If left untreated, this can affect central vision. The current standard treatment for diabetic macular edema includes medications injected directly into the eye (intravitreal injections) and laser eye treatment. The drugs that are injected directly into the eye are known as anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agents which help to reduce the leaking. This includes bevacizumab (Avastin®) and ranibizumab (Lucentis®). However, some patients do not respond well to these anti-VEGF treatments will be given the option of switching to an another class of medications, called steroids. Triamcinolone acetonide is one of these steroids and is also injected directly into the eye. These steroids will help reduce inflammation and possibly as a consequence, reduce swelling in the eye. The purpose of this study is to determine what cellular factors affect a patient's treatment response (amount of swelling reduction) following triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injections for diabetic macular edema.
Contrast sensitivity is a tool use to evaluate the visual function in all patients. It can be modified by different pathologies or by age. The purpose of this study is to identify the changes that could be in relationship with the course of diabetic retinopathy comparing with diabetic patient without retinopathy and in patients with diabetic macular edema so if it is a difference, research for therapeutic strategies to improve it in this patients.
This is a Phase 1 study to investigate the safety, tolerability of the novel plasma kallikrein inhibitor, KVD001 in subjects with diabetic macular edema. The study is the first step to investigate the hypothesis that plasma kallikrein plays an important role in the disease process behind diabetic macular edema in many patients
This pilot study aims to establish that treatment with near infrared light (NIR) reduces diabetic macular oedema in patients suffering diabetic retinopathy by exerting a positive beneficial effect at retinal cellular level.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal ranibizumab by determining the pathogenesis of macular edema, which cause a direct effect on visual function. In particular, we focus on the correlation between the treatment effectiveness of ranibizumab and the role of the cytokines involved in the cause of macular edema.
The exact incidence of optic disc swelling and idiopathic intracranial hypertension in patients using antiacne medication is not known so far. The investigators hypothesize that swelling of retinal nerve fibre layer measured by optical coherence tomography is more frequent then assumed so far.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mean gain in best corrected visual acuity and the number of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections under the combination treatment of IVR, focal/grid laser and panretinal photocoagulation. Our hypothesis is that suitable photocoagulation decreases the number of IVR injections.