The Use of the CUE1 in People With Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders

Dystonia Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Use of the CUE1 Device in People With Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Related Disorders: A Feasibility Study

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT06174948
• Other study ID #: 333484
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 2024
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: Queen Mary University of London
• Contact: Cristina Simonet, PhD
• Phone: 020 7882 3543
• Email: c.simonet[@]qmul.ac.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

People with Parkinson's disease (PD) commonly experience a range of both motor (e.g., bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability) and non-motor (e.g., fatigue, psychiatric and behavioural disturbances, autonomic dysfunction, cognitive impairment, sleep dysfunction and olfactory loss) features. Currently, it is challenging to alleviate these symptoms with first-line treatment, the medications such as levodopa. The CUE1 is a non-invasive device, which is approved for sale in the UK market as a Class I low risk device. It is worn on the sternum or other part of the body such as the forearm and attaches to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved.

The CUE1 delivers pulsing cueing and vibrotactile stimulation to help improve symptoms in people with PD and it has shown to be effective in doing so in previous small case studies. This 9-week feasibility study aims to investigate the feasibility, safety, tolerability and effect of using the CUE1 as an intervention to improve motor and non-motor symptoms in people with PD and related movement disorders. People with clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including those with progressive supranuclear palsy, multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration, and vascular Parkinsonism as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders aged over 18 years old who have the capacity to provide a written consent form to take part in the study, will receive as intervention to wear the CUE1 device at home, on daily basis while carrying out their activities of daily living. Participants will also have to attend four face-to-face appointments of approximately half a day, at weeks -0, -3, -6 and -9 of the study to discuss how they are getting on with using the CUE1 and complete questionnaires on their symptoms, walking, balance, and movement tests as well as a participant's clinical diary.

Description:

Background:

Cueing is a mechanism of applying an external temporal or spatial stimulus to facilitate movement initiation and continuation and it can be somatosensory, auditory, attentional or visual. It is reported to work by shifting habitual motor control to goal directed motor control. Many studies have demonstrated that cueing helps to improve postural control, balance, FOG, as well as DT performance in activities involving the upper and lower limbs in people with PD. However, many cueing modalities used for the research purposes in the laboratory environments cannot be easily replicated in people's homes. Thus, a recent narrative review recommends the development of cueing wearable systems that can be used at home or in the community to improve gait and posture in PD.

Interventions utilising vibrotactile sensory stimulation in PD can be split into two main groups: a) whole body vibrotactile stimulation and b) focused (e.g., targeted) vibrotactile stimulation. The results on the effectiveness of whole body vibrotactile stimulation on sensory dysfunction and motor symptoms are mixed with a large variation being reported from none to small improvement on motor symptoms, balance, gait and mobility. On the other side, focused vibrotactile stimulation which is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used by somatosensory cues (e.g., tactile/somatosensory cueing) to apply gentle vibrations to focal joints in the body may have a more positive and consistent effect. Trials which include cylindrical vibration devices on the triceps, a vibrotactile waistband around the abdomen in FOG, vibrotactile insoles to reduce falls and a proprioceptive stabiliser on postural instability show promising results. The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which utilises a metronome-like pulsed vibration which represents both auditory and somatosensory low frequency cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation to help improve motor task performance in people with PD. It is a CE marked and MHRA registered non-invasive medical device.

Rationale for the study:

Like other cueing and vibrotactile stimulation devices, the CUE1 stands out as a non-invasive medical instrument. It employs a metronome-like pulsed vibration, incorporating both auditory and somatosensory low-frequency cueing, along with high-frequency targeted vibrotactile stimulation. This design aims to enhance motor task performance in individuals with PD. Preliminary assessments of employing the CUE1 indicated an overall enhancement of 16.75% in motor symptoms, as evidenced in the White Paper on Proof of Concept from 2019. This improvement was observed not only in the MDS-UPDRS Part III Motor test score-considered the benchmark for evaluating motor symptoms in individuals with PD-but also in various assessments such as the TUG test, TTT, and diverse gait features. Moreover, users reported that donning the CUE1 device contributed to enhanced fatigue levels and increased subjective balance confidence.

Subsequent investigations from smaller-scale studies revealed notable advancements linked to CUE1 usage. Specifically, the device was shown to significantly boost gait speed in the TUG test and improve MDS-UPDRS performance scores while reducing falls by an impressive 85%. Furthermore, a reduction in Freezing of Gait (FOG) and an augmentation in walking speed, accompanied by positive feedback from individuals with PD regarding their experience with the CUE1 has been shown.

This single group feasibility study will test primarily the feasibility, safety and tolerability and secondary the effect of the CUE1 device in people with PD and related disorders. This clinical study aims to identify whether the results seen in the prototype testing and previous small studies can be reproduced in a controlled clinical setting. Overall the risk assessment related to the use of the CUE1 device has been previously tested on people with PD and has shown to have a minimal chance for error or adverse effect to the patient. Based on real world data, the CUE1 has shown to be effective in significantly improving motor symptoms such as rigidity, stiffness, tremor and slowness of movement in people with PD. CUE1 has also shown to improve fatigue, walking speed, balance and FOG and decrease falls in people with PD. The potential harm for the people with PD was very low, the acceptance of using the CUE1 device was very good, and positive user feedback was received. The device also utilised medical grade established silicone-based skin adhesives. The product is water resistant and designed to CE standards hence product and electrical malfunction risk will be low.

Positive results arising from this feasibility study will strengthen the evidence that the CUE1 device is feasible to be used, tolerated, safe and help to improve movement and mobility in people living with PD and related disorders. It may also assist in selecting the most appropriate outcome measures to test the effectiveness of the CUE1 and contribute to the growing academic interest in the application of peripheral stimulation in other neurological disorders with movement, gait and balance problems such as various types of dystonias and tremors, multiple sclerosis, stroke and vestibular disorders.

Methodology:

This is a 9-week feasibility study which will involve wearing the CUE1 device on a daily basis at participants' homes while they continue their usual activities of daily living (ADL). The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which delivers low frequency metronomes like tactile cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation. All participants will be using the same pre-programmed settings for the CUE1 device which are: vibration strength delivered at 80%, pulse length 800 milliseconds (ms), and rest length 800ms as set at baseline and will not change. The CUE1 device is attached to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved. Participants will be provided with the adhesive patches and shown how to use them and the CUE1 device by the research team.

Intervention

All participants will use the CUE1 device as follows:

• during the first two weeks (e.g., 1-2 weeks) of the 9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 2 hours in the morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day;

• during the weeks 4-5 of the 9 weeks in the study: once a day for a continuous duration of 8 hours, starting from morning, 1 hour after taking the medication (if any) for PD or related disorder, every single day;

• during the weeks 7-8 of the 9 weeks in the study: only at night, through all night, every single night and not during the day at all;

Participants have to wear the device only for the time they use it. They must then remove it but keep the adhesive on the skin until the next use of the device. They cannot keep the device on their body deactivated, until the next use.

Assessments Four face to face appointments will be arranged for each participant. The appointments will take place at week-0 (baseline), week-3 (follow up 1), -6 (follow up 2), and -9 (follow up 3). Each appointment will last approximately half a day.

These appointments will be used to complete the participant's eligibility (baseline appointment)/ re-assess the participant's eligibility (follow-up appointments) for taking part in the study, explain information related to the CUE1 device, physically observe any adverse reactions to CUE1 device, discuss and participant's response to the intervention, collect self-reported and objective data and answer any queries participants may have in relation to their symptoms and trial. During these appointments, the research team will help each participant to set up on their phone the reminders for when to wear and when not to wear the CUE1 device as well as when to complete the participant's clinical diary. The research team will physically observe participant's skin at the site where the adhesive patch was applied for any skin irritation, redness, and/or sensitivity. At the end of the trial, participants can keep the CUE1 device they used to continue long term usage if they find it beneficial. Those who do not wish to keep the CUE1 device, will be welcome to return it to the research team.

Research sites:

Participants' Identification Sites are Barts Health NHS, Neurology, E1 1BB and Brying Assessment and Rehabilitation Unit, Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust, E9 66SR. The recruitment site is Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ. The identification of Participants will be undertaken by Dr Viktoria Azoidou who is employed full time by QMUL but holds a research passport for Barts Health NHS. The recruitment will be undertaken by Dr Azoidou as well at the QMUL as all other research activities.

Objectives/aims:

The primary objective is to assess the feasibility, safety and tolerability of the CUE1 device as intervention in people with idiopathic PD and related disorders aged over 18 years old.

The secondary objective is to investigate the effect of the CUE1 device on participants' motor and non-motor symptoms, gait, balance and falls risk.

Statistical consideration:

As this is a single group feasibility study, there is no formal plan for formal statistical analysis due to the small sample size and lack of statistical power. However, for a future trial an analysis plan has been developed which will be run in this study to determine its appropriateness.

Sample size:

Sample size is followed as recommended from previous literature for pilot studies. The required sample size for this study is a minimum 10 people with no maximum limit to recruitment. Instead, we have a timed deadline for recruitment of the last participant which is the 31st of December 2024. This will allow the researchers to gain preliminary data on the primary outcomes of feasibility, safety and tolerability of the CUE1 intervention. This will also provide sufficient data to explore trends for effectiveness to allow for sample size estimates to be drawn up for a future trial.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 10
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: December 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adults over 18 years old

• Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD and related disorders including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), multiple system atrophy (MSA), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), and vascular Parkinsonism (VaP) as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders

• willing to participate and written consent provided after read the participant information sheet.

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals with:

• other neurological disorders excluding idiopathic PD, related disorders such PSP, MSA, CBD, and VaP as well as atypical dystonias and tremor disorders, affecting movement, balance and gait

• metabolic or autoimmune disorders affecting movement, balance and gait

• acute orthopaedic disorders influencing balance control and gait

• audiovestibular disorders including severe hearing loss

• visual disturbances, poor eyesight

• not able to provide written consent form to participate

• clinical diagnosis of cognitive impairment including dementia or Alzheimer's.

• Mental impairments (illusions, hallucinations, impulse control disorders) (self-reported)

Technical contraindications related to CUE1 device:

• implanted metallic or electronic devices usage

• hypersensitivity to vibrotactile stimulation

• skin conditions and/or open wound in the area of where the device will be positioned (e.g., sternum) if taking medicines for PD or related disorder, then on stable dose of treatment for the last three months.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Corticobasal Degeneration
• Dystonia
• Multiple System Atrophy
• Parkinson Disease
• Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonism
• Parkinsonian Disorders
• Progressive Supranuclear Palsy
• Shy-Drager Syndrome
• Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
• Tremor
• Vascular Parkinsonism

Intervention

Device:
• CUE1 non-invasive device
This is a 9-week feasibility study which will involve wearing the CUE1 device on a daily basis at participants' homes while they continue their usual activities of daily living (ADL). The CUE1 is a non-invasive medical device which delivers low frequency metronomes like tactile cueing and high frequency focused vibrotactile stimulation. All participants will be using the same pre-programmed settings for the CUE1 device which are: vibration strength delivered at 80%, pulse length 800 milliseconds (ms), and rest length 800ms as set at baseline and will not change. The CUE1 device is attached to the skin via an adhesive patch which has been dermatologically tested and approved. Participants will be provided with the adhesive patches and shown how to use them and the CUE1 device by the research team.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Queen Mary University of London

References & Publications (69)

Akram N, Li H, Ben-Joseph A, Budu C, Gallagher DA, Bestwick JP, Schrag A, Noyce AJ, Simonet C. Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):386. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03563-7. — View Citation

Basta D, Rossi-Izquierdo M, Soto-Varela A, Greters ME, Bittar RS, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Eckardt R, Harada T, Goto F, Ogawa K, Ernst A. Efficacy of a vibrotactile neurofeedback training in stance and gait conditions for the treatment of balance deficits: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Dec;32(9):1492-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823827ec. — View Citation

Beck EN, Ehgoetz Martens KA, Almeida QJ. Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: An Overload Problem? PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0144986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144986. eCollection 2015. — View Citation

Bloem BR, Grimbergen YA, Cramer M, Valkenburg VV. "Stops walking when talking" does not predict falls in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 2000 Aug;48(2):268. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200008)48:23.0.co;2-4. No abstract available. — View Citation

Bloem BR, Okun MS, Klein C. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2021 Jun 12;397(10291):2284-2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00218-X. Epub 2021 Apr 10. — View Citation

Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. — View Citation

Chaudhuri KR, Schrag A, Weintraub D, Rizos A, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Mamikonyan E, Martinez-Martin P. The movement disorder society nonmotor rating scale: Initial validation study. Mov Disord. 2020 Jan;35(1):116-133. doi: 10.1002/mds.27862. Epub 2019 Sep 30. Erratum In: Mov Disord. 2020 Oct;35(10):1892. — View Citation

Chomiak T, Watts A, Meyer N, Pereira FV, Hu B. A training approach to improve stepping automaticity while dual-tasking in Parkinson's disease: A prospective pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(5):e5934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005934. — View Citation

Conte A, Khan N, Defazio G, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A. Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013 Dec;9(12):687-97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2013.224. Epub 2013 Nov 12. — View Citation

Dal Bello-Haas V, Klassen L, Sheppard MS, Metcalfe A. Psychometric Properties of Activity, Self-Efficacy, and Quality-of-Life Measures in Individuals with Parkinson Disease. Physiother Can. 2011 Winter;63(1):47-57. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2009-08. Epub 2011 Jan 20. — View Citation

Dincher A, Schwarz M, Wydra G. Analysis of the Effects of Whole-Body Vibration in Parkinson Disease - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PM R. 2019 Jun;11(6):640-653. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12094. Epub 2019 May 6. — View Citation

Dorsey ER, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The Emerging Evidence of the Parkinson Pandemic. J Parkinsons Dis. 2018;8(s1):S3-S8. doi: 10.3233/JPD-181474. — View Citation

Farombi TH, Owolabi MO, Ogunniyi A. Falls and Their Associated Risks in Parkinson's Disease Patients in Nigeria. J Mov Disord. 2016 Sep;9(3):160-5. doi: 10.14802/jmd.16011. Epub 2016 Sep 21. — View Citation

Fok P, Farrell M, McMeeken J. Prioritizing gait in dual-task conditions in people with Parkinson's. Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Oct;29(5):831-42. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Aug 19. — View Citation

Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon ES, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn AD. Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2000 Jul 1;6(3):165-170. doi: 10.1016/s1353-8020(99)00062-0. — View Citation

Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, Stebbins GT, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, Poewe W, Sampaio C, Stern MB, Dodel R, Dubois B, Holloway R, Jankovic J, Kulisevsky J, Lang AE, Lees A, Leurgans S, LeWitt PA, Nyenhuis D, Olanow CW, Rascol O, Schrag A, Teresi JA, van Hilten JJ, LaPelle N; Movement Disorder Society UPDRS Revision Task Force. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord. 2008 Nov 15;23(15):2129-70. doi: 10.1002/mds.22340. — View Citation

Goncalves H, Moreira R, Rodrigues A, Santos C. Finding Parameters around the Abdomen for a Vibrotactile System: Healthy and Patients with Parkinson's Disease. J Med Syst. 2018 Oct 13;42(11):232. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1087-2. — View Citation

Grosset D, Taurah L, Burn DJ, MacMahon D, Forbes A, Turner K, Bowron A, Walker R, Findley L, Foster O, Patel K, Clough C, Castleton B, Smith S, Carey G, Murphy T, Hill J, Brechany U, McGee P, Reading S, Brand G, Kelly L, Breen K, Ford S, Baker M, Williams A, Hearne J, Qizilbash N, Chaudhuri KR. A multicentre longitudinal observational study of changes in self reported health status in people with Parkinson's disease left untreated at diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 May;78(5):465-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.098327. Epub 2006 Nov 10. — View Citation

Hasan H, Burrows M, Athauda DS, Hellman B, James B, Warner T, Foltynie T, Giovannoni G, Lees AJ, Noyce AJ. The BRadykinesia Akinesia INcoordination (BRAIN) Tap Test: Capturing the Sequence Effect. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2019 Jun 25;6(6):462-469. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12798. eCollection 2019 Jul. — View Citation

Heremans E, Nackaerts E, Vervoort G, Broeder S, Swinnen SP, Nieuwboer A. Impaired Retention of Motor Learning of Writing Skills in Patients with Parkinson's Disease with Freezing of Gait. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148933. eCollection 2016. — View Citation

Hoops S, Nazem S, Siderowf AD, Duda JE, Xie SX, Stern MB, Weintraub D. Validity of the MoCA and MMSE in the detection of MCI and dementia in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2009 Nov 24;73(21):1738-45. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c34b47. — View Citation

Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, Lorig K, Loureiro MI, van der Meer JW, Schnabel P, Smith R, van Weel C, Smid H. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011 Jul 26;343:d4163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4163. No abstract available. — View Citation

Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jan;27(1):26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2003.11.003. — View Citation

Isaacson S, O'Brien A, Lazaro JD, Ray A, Fluet G. The JFK BIG study: the impact of LSVT BIG(R) on dual task walking and mobility in persons with Parkinson's disease. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Apr;30(4):636-641. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.636. Epub 2018 Apr 20. — View Citation

Jacobs JV, Nutt JG, Carlson-Kuhta P, Allen R, Horak FB. Dual tasking during postural stepping responses increases falls but not freezing in people with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Jul;20(7):779-81. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 14. — View Citation

Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Peto V, Greenhall R, Hyman N. The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score. Age Ageing. 1997 Sep;26(5):353-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.5.353. — View Citation

Killane I, Fearon C, Newman L, McDonnell C, Waechter SM, Sons K, Lynch T, Reilly RB. Dual Motor-Cognitive Virtual Reality Training Impacts Dual-Task Performance in Freezing of Gait. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015 Nov;19(6):1855-61. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2479625. Epub 2015 Sep 17. — View Citation

Krupp LB, LaRocca NG, Muir-Nash J, Steinberg AD. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch Neurol. 1989 Oct;46(10):1121-3. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520460115022. — View Citation

Lajoie Y, Gallagher SP. Predicting falls within the elderly community: comparison of postural sway, reaction time, the Berg balance scale and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale for comparing fallers and non-fallers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;38(1):11-26. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4943(03)00082-7. — View Citation

Lamont RM, Morris ME, Menz HB, McGinley JL, Brauer SG. Falls in people with Parkinson's disease: A prospective comparison of community and home-based falls. Gait Posture. 2017 Jun;55:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 4. — View Citation

Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Functional gait assessment and balance evaluation system test: reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying individuals with Parkinson disease who fall. Phys Ther. 2011 Jan;91(1):102-13. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100113. Epub 2010 Nov 11. — View Citation

Mak MK, Yu L, Hui-Chan CW. The immediate effect of a novel audio-visual cueing strategy (simulated traffic lights) on dual-task walking in people with Parkinson's disease. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013 Apr;49(2):153-9. Epub 2013 Mar 13. — View Citation

Mancini M, Smulders K, Harker G, Stuart S, Nutt JG. Assessment of the ability of open- and closed-loop cueing to improve turning and freezing in people with Parkinson's disease. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 24;8(1):12773. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31156-4. — View Citation

Marchetti GF, Lin CC, Alghadir A, Whitney SL. Responsiveness and minimal detectable change of the dynamic gait index and functional gait index in persons with balance and vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014 Apr;38(2):119-24. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000015. — View Citation

Munoz-Hellin E, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Miangolarra-Page JC. [Visual cues as a therapeutic tool in Parkinson's disease. A systematic review]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 2. Spanish. — View Citation

Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B, de Haan RJ; CARPA Study Group. Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild to moderate Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2008 Jun 3;70(23):2241-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000313835.33830.80. — View Citation

Muthukrishnan N, Abbas JJ, Shill HA, Krishnamurthi N. Cueing Paradigms to Improve Gait and Posture in Parkinson's Disease: A Narrative Review. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 11;19(24):5468. doi: 10.3390/s19245468. — View Citation

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991. — View Citation

Nieuwboer A, Kwakkel G, Rochester L, Jones D, van Wegen E, Willems AM, Chavret F, Hetherington V, Baker K, Lim I. Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson's disease: the RESCUE trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;78(2):134-40. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.200X.097923. Erratum In: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;81(12):1414. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;81(1):126. — View Citation

Noyce AJ, Nagy A, Acharya S, Hadavi S, Bestwick JP, Fearnley J, Lees AJ, Giovannoni G. Bradykinesia-akinesia incoordination test: validating an online keyboard test of upper limb function. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 29;9(4):e96260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096260. eCollection 2014. Erratum In: PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105488. — View Citation

Nutt JG, Bloem BR, Giladi N, Hallett M, Horak FB, Nieuwboer A. Freezing of gait: moving forward on a mysterious clinical phenomenon. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Aug;10(8):734-44. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70143-0. — View Citation

Otis MJ, Ayena JC, Tremblay LE, Fortin PE, Menelas BA. Use of an Enactive Insole for Reducing the Risk of Falling on Different Types of Soil Using Vibrotactile Cueing for the Elderly. PLoS One. 2016 Sep 7;11(9):e0162107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162107. eCollection 2016. — View Citation

Park JK, Kim SJ. Dual-Task-Based Drum Playing with Rhythmic Cueing on Motor and Attention Control in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Preliminary Randomized Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 26;18(19):10095. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910095. — View Citation

Pereira MP, Gobbi LT, Almeida QJ. Freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: Evidence of sensory rather than attentional mechanisms through muscle vibration. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016 Aug;29:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 May 21. — View Citation

Pfeifer KJ, Kromer JA, Cook AJ, Hornbeck T, Lim EA, Mortimer BJP, Fogarty AS, Han SS, Dhall R, Halpern CH, Tass PA. Coordinated Reset Vibrotactile Stimulation Induces Sustained Cumulative Benefits in Parkinson's Disease. Front Physiol. 2021 Apr 6;12:624317. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.624317. eCollection 2021. — View Citation

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. — View Citation

Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Gasser T, Dubois B, Chan P, Bloem BR, Adler CH, Deuschl G. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424. — View Citation

Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28. — View Citation

Redgrave P, Rodriguez M, Smith Y, Rodriguez-Oroz MC, Lehericy S, Bergman H, Agid Y, DeLong MR, Obeso JA. Goal-directed and habitual control in the basal ganglia: implications for Parkinson's disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Nov;11(11):760-72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2915. Epub 2010 Oct 14. — View Citation

Rochester L, Baker K, Hetherington V, Jones D, Willems AM, Kwakkel G, Van Wegen E, Lim I, Nieuwboer A. Evidence for motor learning in Parkinson's disease: acquisition, automaticity and retention of cued gait performance after training with external rhythmical cues. Brain Res. 2010 Mar 10;1319:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Jan 11. — View Citation

Rochester L, Burn DJ, Woods G, Godwin J, Nieuwboer A. Does auditory rhythmical cueing improve gait in people with Parkinson's disease and cognitive impairment? A feasibility study. Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 30;24(6):839-45. doi: 10.1002/mds.22400. — View Citation

Rochester L, Nieuwboer A, Baker K, Hetherington V, Willems AM, Chavret F, Kwakkel G, Van Wegen E, Lim I, Jones D. The attentional cost of external rhythmical cues and their impact on gait in Parkinson's disease: effect of cue modality and task complexity. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2007;114(10):1243-8. doi: 10.1007/s00702-007-0756-y. Epub 2007 Jun 28. — View Citation

Rochester L, Rafferty D, Dotchin C, Msuya O, Minde V, Walker RW. The effect of cueing therapy on single and dual-task gait in a drug naive population of people with Parkinson's disease in northern Tanzania. Mov Disord. 2010 May 15;25(7):906-11. doi: 10.1002/mds.22978. — View Citation

Shribman S, Hasan H, Hadavi S, Giovannoni G, Noyce AJ. The BRAIN test: a keyboard-tapping test to assess disability and clinical features of multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2018 Feb;265(2):285-290. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8690-x. Epub 2017 Dec 4. — View Citation

Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):301-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011. Epub 2011 Dec 9. — View Citation

Skerrett TN, Moss-Morris R. Fatigue and social impairment in multiple sclerosis: the role of patients' cognitive and behavioral responses to their symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2006 Nov;61(5):587-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.04.018. — View Citation

Spaulding SJ, Barber B, Colby M, Cormack B, Mick T, Jenkins ME. Cueing and gait improvement among people with Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Mar;94(3):562-70. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.026. Epub 2012 Nov 2. — View Citation

Stuart S, Mancini M. Prefrontal Cortical Activation With Open and Closed-Loop Tactile Cueing When Walking and Turning in Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Apr;44(2):121-131. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000286. — View Citation

Tan XS, Pierres F, Dallman-Porter A, Hardie-Brown W, Kwon KY. Focused Vibrotactile Stimulation with Cueing Effect on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: Two Case Reports. J Mov Disord. 2021 Sep;14(3):236-238. doi: 10.14802/jmd.21076. Epub 2021 Sep 8. — View Citation

van Wegen E, de Goede C, Lim I, Rietberg M, Nieuwboer A, Willems A, Jones D, Rochester L, Hetherington V, Berendse H, Zijlmans J, Wolters E, Kwakkel G. The effect of rhythmic somatosensory cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 2006 Oct 25;248(1-2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.05.034. Epub 2006 Jun 14. — View Citation

Volpe D, Giantin MG, Fasano A. A wearable proprioceptive stabilizer (Equistasi(R)) for rehabilitation of postural instability in Parkinson's disease: a phase II randomized double-blind, double-dummy, controlled study. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 17;9(11):e112065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112065. eCollection 2014. — View Citation

Wagle Shukla A, Ounpraseuth S, Okun MS, Gray V, Schwankhaus J, Metzer WS. Micrographia and related deficits in Parkinson's disease: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 25;2(3):e000628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000628. Print 2012. — View Citation

Weir S, Samnaliev M, Kuo TC, Tierney TS, Walleser Autiero S, Taylor RS, Schrag A. Short- and long-term cost and utilization of health care resources in Parkinson's disease in the UK. Mov Disord. 2018 Jul;33(6):974-981. doi: 10.1002/mds.27302. Epub 2018 Mar 30. — View Citation

Wilhelm A, Riedl T, Paumann C, Janssen J. Exploring a New Cueing Device in People Who Experience Freezing of Gait: Acceptance of a Study Design. Parkinsons Dis. 2022 Dec 7;2022:1631169. doi: 10.1155/2022/1631169. eCollection 2022. — View Citation

Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concurrent, discriminative, and predictive validity in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2010 May;90(5):761-73. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090069. Epub 2010 Apr 1. — View Citation

Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, Whitney SL. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Phys Ther. 2004 Oct;84(10):906-18. — View Citation

Yang Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chen C, Xing D, Wang C. Validity of the Functional Gait Assessment in patients with Parkinson disease: construct, concurrent, and predictive validity. Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;94(3):392-400. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130019. Epub 2013 Oct 24. — View Citation

Yang Y, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Chen C, Xing D. Reliability of functional gait assessment in patients with Parkinson disease: Interrater and intrarater reliability and internal consistency. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(34):e4545. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004545. — View Citation

Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. — View Citation

* Note: There are 69 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Age	Age is recorded in years and collected as baseline demographic characteristic only.	within 1 minute
Other	Gender	Gender is recorded as male, female, and other, and collected as baseline demographic characteristic only.	within 1 minute
Other	Disease duration	The disease duration is recorded in years and collected as baseline demographic characteristic only.	within 1 minute
Other	Hoehn & Yahr (H &Y)	Hoehn & Yahr (H & Y) scale is used to record the disease severity for people with Parkinson's disease.	within 1 minute
Other	Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tool	The MoCA is a rapid screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation. It has been recommended that cut-off scores of <26/30 be used to identify multi-domain cognitive impairment.	within 5 minutes
Other	Cognitive Behavioural Symptom Questionnaire (CBSQ)	The CBSQ is a measure of subjects' cognitive (i.e. beliefs) and behavioural responses to symptoms of their health condition. This measure includes five cognitive (i.e. beliefs) subscales: Symptom Focusing, Catastrophizing, Damaging Beliefs, Fear Avoidance and Embarrassment Avoidance; and two behavioural subscales: All or- Nothing and Avoidance/Rest. All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 'strongly disagree' to 'strongly agree'.	within 5 minutes
Other	Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R)	The IPQ-R was used to measure participants' illness perceptions. The IPQ-R measures the key components in Leventhal's common sense self-regulatory model: Illness identity was measured by asking patients to indicate whether they have experienced and attribute a number of potential symptoms to their dizziness condition, with higher scores (range 0-24) indicating increased illness identity. In accordance with the recommendations from the authors, some items were added based on feedback from a patient-public involvement group so as to reflect the symptoms experienced by people with vestibular disorders. Causal Factors were measured by asking participants to list up to three things that they believed caused their condition.	within 5 minutes
Primary	Recruitment rate	This is a feasibility outcome, the recruitment rate which will be calculated as the percentage of eligible participants enrolled in the study. This will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.	1 minute
Primary	Compliance with interventions	This is a feasibility outcome, compliance with interventions, which will be reported as the percentage of days completed using the CUE1 device and duration of using the CUE1 device. These will be reported at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.	1 minute
Primary	Dropout rate	This is a feasibility outcome which will report the dropout rate at each follow up appointment at weeks -3, -6 and -9.	1 minute
Primary	Physical observation	This is a safety and tolerability outcome which will be assessed by carrying out a physical observation by research team during the face to face appointments of any adverse event occurring as a result of using the adhesive patches. The adverse events in relation to the CUE1 device will be reported in the participants' clinical diary and discussed during the appointments with the research team.	1 minute
Secondary	Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) questionnaire	There are two parts in the PGI-C questionnaire. In part one, the patient scores on a scale 0-7 (0 = no change or condition has got worse, 7 = a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that has made all the difference) the change in their activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall QoL related to painful conditions. In part two, the patient scores on a scale 0-10 (0 = much better, 10 = much worse), the score that matches their degree of change since beginning the specific care (here the intervention with CUE1). The PGI-C will be completed at follow up appointments, at weeks-3, -6, and -9.	5 minutes
Secondary	Participant's clinical diary	This will be completed daily by the participant at home for 9 weeks, starting from week-1 of and finishing at the end of week-9 of the intervention. The diaries will be completed on the weeks of the intervention (e.g., 1-2, 4-5 and 7-8). The research team will provide the same instructions on how to complete the participant's diary to each person during the baseline appointment at week-0.	15 minutes
Secondary	Functional Gait Assessment (FGA)	The FGA is a 10-item test that assesses performance on complex gait tasks (i.e., walking with head turns, stepping over an obstacle, stopping and turning or climbing stairs). Scores for each item are between 0-3. The highest score is 30 and greater outcomes are indicative of better performance. The FGA has been validated in healthy people, older adults with a history of falls and balance impairments, and people with balance problems including those with PD. The minimal detectable change for the FGA is reported to be 4 points in people with PD. Scores =22/30 identify fall risk and are predictable of falls in community-living older persons within 6 months. In people with PD, the cutoff point for predicting falls is 18/30, with sensitivity of 80.6%, specificity of 80.0%, and positive likelihood ratio of 4.03.	10 minutes
Secondary	Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Motor Part III	The MDS-UPDRS Motor Part III assesses the motor symptoms in people with PD. There are 33 scores based on 18 questions with several right, left or other body distribution scores. All items have 5 response options with uniform anchors of 0 = normal, 1 = slight (symptoms/signs with sufficiently low frequency or intensity to cause no impact on function), 2 = mild (symptoms/signs of frequency or intensity sufficient to cause a modest impact on function), 3 = moderate (symptoms/signs sufficiently frequent or intense to impact considerably, but not prevent function), and 4 = severe (symptoms/signs that prevent function). Higher scores indicate greater impact of PD symptoms. Score range between 0 and 132, 32 and below is mild, 59 and above is severe.	10 minutes
Secondary	Timed Up and Go test (TUG)	The TUG assesses mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risks. The mean time in people with PD has been reported between 10.3-14.8 seconds.	5 minutes
Secondary	Bradykinesia Akinesia Incoordination test (BRAIN test)	The BRAIN test is used to assess upper limb motor function. The BRAIN test has been redeveloped to run in all internet browser software and has been validated in patients with PD and controls. Participants use the index finger of a single hand to alternately strike the 'S' and ';' keys on a standard computer keyboard, as fast and accurately as possible. The test is repeated for the other hand. The BRAIN test can be accessed at http://www.predictpd.com/braintest and applications to use this can be directed to AJN via the same web link.	5 minutes
Secondary	Distal Finger Tapping (DFT)	The DFT test is a web-based keyboard tapping test which has been validated to remotely evaluate upper limb movements and quantify separate kinetic components such as speed, akinesia and rhythm as part of motor dysfunction in PD. It is available online via https://predictpd.com/en/braintest, and compatible with regular laptops and computers with a keyboard. The DFT test consists of a 20-second single key tapping test. Participants will be instructed to repeatedly tap the down arrow key with their left index finger, as fast as possible for 20 s, whilst simultaneously depressing the left arrow key with their left middle finger. The same task will then be repeated for the right hand. These instructions stabilise the wrist and forearm, isolating movement to the index finger metacarpal joint, thereby giving a true measurement of distal finger movement.	5 minutes
Secondary	Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC)	The ABC is a 16-item questionnaire which assesses self-perceived balance confidence in daily activities. Scores range from 0-100; scores = 67/100 are associated with increased fall risk. Higher scores indicate greater balance confidence.	5 minutes
Secondary	Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)	The PSQI includes seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Scores range from 0-21 with a higher total score indicating worse sleep quality. In distinguishing good and poor sleepers, a global PSQI score > 5 yields sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5%.	5 minutes
Secondary	Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)	The FSS is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders, including those with PD diagnosis. The items are scored on a 7-point scale with 1 = strongly disagree and 7= strongly agree. The minimum score = 9 and maximum score possible = 63. Higher the score = greater fatigue severity.	5 minutes
Secondary	Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)	The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses PD-specific health related quality over the last month. It assesses how often patients experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions and impact of PD on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. The scoring is done on a 5-point ordinal system (e.g., 0 = never, 1 = occasionally, 2 = sometimes, 3 = often, 4 = always). Each dimension's total score ranges from 0 (never have difficulty) to 100 (always have difficulty). Lower scores reflect better quality of life.	5 minutes
Secondary	Movement Disorder Society-Non-Motor Scale (MDS-NMS)	The MDS-NMS is a revision of the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) and was developed to improve and refine the assessment of non-motor symptoms in people with PD. This rater-completed assessment measures frequency and severity of 13 non-motor domains, over 52 items and covers a range of key non-motor symptoms both PD and treatment related, and in greater depth, compared with the NMSS. The scale also has a new MDS-NMS Non-Motor Fluctuations (NMF) Subscale to assess changes in non-motor symptoms in relation to the timing of anti-parkinsonian medications across 8 domains. The scoring is done on a scale 0-4 for frequency/duration and severity of symptoms (e.g., 0 absence to 4 most severe/frequent). Total score ranges between o-334, the greater the score, the more severe and frequent the non-motor symptoms experienced.	5 minutes
Secondary	Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) (Parts I, II, IV).	The rest of the MDS-UPDRS scale consists of three parts (apart from Part III Motor which will be completed already above): Part I, II and IV which include questions to assess non-motor experiences of daily living, motor experiences of daily living, and motor complications, of people living with PD, respectively.	15 minutes
Secondary	Participant's satisfaction form	This form will be will be provided to participants to complete at the last follow up appointment (week -9) to feedback on their experience on using the intervention, and support and services received from the research team.	5 minutes