Dry Eye Syndrome Clinical Trial
Official title:
Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 Versus Systane ® Ultra and Systane ® Ultra Preservative Free on Tear Film Dysfunction Syndrome From Mild to Moderate
Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-087 versus Systane ® Ultra and Systane ®
Ultra Preservative Free on the Tear Film Dysfunction Syndrome from Mild to Moderate Clinical
trial To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by
Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological
characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of
the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra
Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.).
Controlled, randomized, double-blind, masked clinical study, comparing the safety and
efficacy of preservative-free PR0-087 vs Systane Ultra with preservative and Systane Ultra
preservative free, in subjects with mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome, for a
period of 90 days plus 15 days of remote surveillance, in which one of the three agents will
be administered (PR0-087, Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free) with a q.i.d.
dosage. in both eyes, with regular follow-up visits (5 overall).
Best-corrected visual acuity Intraocular pressure Ocular surface Anterior segment examination
Posterior segment examination Tear film break-up time Schirmer test Corneal epithelization
Goblet cells count Adverse events Subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild to moderate tear
film dysfunction syndrome between 18 and 90 years old, without concomitant eye diseases nor
requiring different treatments of any of the three interventions in this study They will be
randomized in 3 groups where PRO-087, Systane® Ultra o Systane® Ultra preservative free will
be administered.
Design Controlled, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy
parameters between a group of subjects with a diagnose of mild to moderate tear film
dysfunction syndrome under a regimen of ophthalmic solution lubricant drops PRO-087 versus
subject under Systane® Ultra or Systane® Ultra preservative free, with the same diagnosis,
with a follow-up of 90 days
MAIN OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the effectiveness of preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by
Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) to restore the anatomical and physiological
characteristics of the ocular surface, as well as its distribution and the characteristics of
the mild to moderate tear film dysfunction syndrome compared to Systane ® Ultra and Ultra
Systane ® preservative free (by Laboratorios Alcon, S.A. de C.V.).
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the safety of the preservative-free ophthalmic formulation PRO-087 (by
Laboratorios Sophia, S.A. de C.V.) on the corneal and conjunctival epithelium, intraocular
pressure, and structures of anterior and posterior segment in patients with tear film
dysfunction syndrome from mild to moderate.
To determine the correlation between improvement of clinical status and perceived improvement
of symptoms of each participant in each study group.
To compare the qualitative and quantitative histological status of the ocular surface before
and after the pharmacological intervention in each study group to determine the evolution
under the intervention of PRO-087.
To evaluate the quantitative rating of tear film production by the Schirmer Test throughout
the study.
To qualitatively assess the tear film production by measuring the tear film break-up time
stained with fluorescein and cobalt filter.
Blinding:
The double-blind study is a procedure in which the patient and the treating doctor ignore to
which intervention group the study patient was assigned. To achieve the blinding of both the
drug in research and both comparator drugs, these will be labeled in the same way (masking).
Besides the figure of an unblinded pharmacist, who is responsible for the delivery of the
medication to the patient, will be added. Blinding codes are protected by an outsider
appointed by the study sponsor. The codes are also available in the research center (fully
sealed), so that they can be consulted by the investigator in case a subject presents a
serious adverse event, prior authorization from the study sponsor; the blinding also
continues rigorous during the data analysis and interpretation.
patients with tear film dysfunction, classified as mild to moderate, will be included and
randomized into 3 groups; the first being treated with PRO-087 ophthalmic solution, the
second with Systane® Ultra ophthalmic solution, and the third with ophthalmic solution
Systane® Ultra preservative free.
Pharmacological Intervention
The pharmacological intervention will be the instillation of the ophthalmic solution in the
bottom of the conjunctival sac during the waking period, in any of the following study
groups:
1. Preservative free PRO-087 ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose 1 drop every 4
hours for 90 days.
2. Systane® Ultra ophthalmic solution. Dropper bottle. Multidose. 1 drop every 4 hours for
90 days.
3. Systane ® Ultra preservative free ophthalmic solution. Single-use vials. 1 drop every 4
hours for 90 days.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT02522312 -
A Retrospective Analysis of Restasis® Benefits in Dry Eye Contact Lens Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02597803 -
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solutions for Dry Eye Syndrome: ARISE-1
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01863368 -
Clinical Evaluation of Systane® ULTRA Compared to OPTIVE® in Ocular Surface Staining
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01753752 -
Evaluation of the Corneal Residence Time of Chitosan-N-acetylcysteine Eye Drops in Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome After Single and Multiple Instillation
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01753687 -
Correlation of Different Signs for Assessment of Dry Eye Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01212471 -
A Dose Ranging Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Bromfenac Ophthalmic Solution in Dry Eye Disease
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT01198782 -
Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of FID 112903 Post Discontinuation of Long-term Use of RESTASIS® (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) 0.05%
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01162954 -
Phase I Study to Evaluate the Tolerability of Eye Drop DA-6034 in Healthy Volunteers
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00544713 -
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of a New Artificial Tear for Use After LASIK Surgery
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00535054 -
Study to Assess the Safety and Patients' Satisfaction of Tears Again* in the Treatment of Dry Eye Symptoms
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00344721 -
A Placebo Controlled Double Masked Clinical Assessment Study of Essential Fatty Acid Supplement and Its Effect on Patients With Apparent Aqueous Deficient Dry Eye Syndrome
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03830359 -
Efficacy, Safety of T2769 in Dry Eye Disease
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04139122 -
Safety, PK and Efficacy Study of SJP-0132 in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT02758327 -
Evaluation of Tear Osmolarity Over Time With Sustained Use of Thera Tears Lubricating Drops
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01970917 -
Effect of Olixia Pure® Eye Drops on Tear Film Thickness in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02066051 -
IPL and Meibomian Gland Expression to Treat Ocular Rosacea Ocular GVHD
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02092207 -
Phase 2 Study to Evaluation the Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered KL7016 in Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01541891 -
Efficacy and Safety of PRO-148 Ophthalmic Solution Versus SYSTANE® in the Treatment of Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01252121 -
Residence Time Evaluation of Systane Ultra Lubricant Eye Drops vs. Hialid and Saline
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00765804 -
Safety and Efficacy Study of Iontophoresis and Dexamethasone Phosphate to Treat Dry Eye
|
Phase 2 |