Cast Versus Splint in Children With Acceptably Angulated Wrist Fractures

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The study will compare the effectiveness of a prefabricated wrist splint with thermoplast reinforcements versus a short arm cast in skeletally immature children.

The hypothesis is that the commercially available wrist splint is at least as effective as traditional casting with respect to recovery of physical function.

Clinical Trial Description

Acceptability angulated wrist bone fractures in children carry an excellent long-term prognosis because of the unique capacity of skeletally immature bones to heal via remodeling. Their management varies widely and there is virtually no scientific evidence supporting one treatment modality over another. Importantly, the most common treatment modality of cast application for four to six weeks is associated with many inconveniences. There are commercially available wrist splints that offer a more convenient alternative. Wrist splints likely have comparable immobilization and symptom relief, while simultaneously allowing for easier bathing and less reliance on subspeciality care. Preliminary adult evidence suggests that, in a comparable adult fracture, splinting may offer a safe alternative to casting, with earlier resumption of the usual activities. However, this treatment modality needs to be compared to the traditional casting management in the pediatric population before it can be recommended for clinical practice.

This study will be the first to challenge the current practice of routine casting and compare it to a commercially available wrist splint with respect to recovery of physical function in children with acceptably angulated wrist fractures. In addition, standardized treatment of these fractures with a splint may be associated with lower morbidity, reduced use of health care resources, and have the potential for cost savings.

This study will compare, in skeletally immature children, the functional outcomes that result from treatment with a prefabricated wrist splint versus a short arm cast in acceptably angulated distal radius fractures. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness of the splint relative to the cast will be evaluated. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT00610220
Study type	Interventional
Source	The Hospital for Sick Children
Contact
Status	Completed
Phase	Phase 4
Start date	January 2007
Completion date	October 2009

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06453447` - Prednisone for CRPS in Distal Radius Fracture	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06136286` - ORIF Distal Radius Blood Flow Restriction Therapy	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06078371` - Opioid-Free Pain Treatment in Trauma Patients	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT05902442` - A Clinical Comparison of Patient-specific 3D Printed Splints Versus Conventional Splints in the Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures.	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT00788190` - Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT02990052` - Conservative Treatment vs. Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT06343467` - Do Generic Volar Locking Plates Provide Similar Outcomes at a Reduced Cost?	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06046404` - Refraining From Closed Reduction of Dislocated Distal Radius Fractures in the Emergency Department	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06251206` - Impact of Early ADL Education on Outcomes Post DRF ORIF	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT00654615` - Fixation of Unstable Distal Radius Fractures	N/A
Completed	`NCT01937624` - Pediatric Distal Radius US Study
Completed	`NCT01007565` - Postoperative Pain After Volar Plating for Distal Radius Fractures	Phase 2
Terminated	`NCT01859468` - A Study Comparing the Effect of Amorphous Calcium Carbonate (ACC) on Healing Time of Distal Radius Fractures	Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed	`NCT01103297` - 2.4 mm Variable Angle LCP Two-Column Volar Distal Radius	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT05942950` - Predicting Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures: a Surgeon Survey
Completed	`NCT06215872` - Effectiveness of Structured Myofacial Chain Exercises After Distal Radius Fracture	N/A
Suspended	`NCT01693094` - A Randomized Trial Measuring the Effect of Decision Aids on Patients' Satisfaction, Conflict of Decision-making and Clinical Outcome	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06235957` - Three Weeks of Cast Immobilisation Versus One Week of Brace Immobilisation in Distal Radius Fractures	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT06019585` - Inmobilization With Compression Bandage vs Antebraquial Splint in Distal Radius Fractures	N/A
Terminated	`NCT02802774` - Immobilization of Postoperative Distal Radius Fractures	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.