Hematoma Block for Distal Radius Fracture

Distal Radius Fracture Clinical Trial

— Hematoma Block  

Official title:

Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Hematoma Block and "Blind" Hematoma Block for Analgesia in Distal Radius Fractures

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02346929
• Other study ID #: 2014P000173
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: August 2014
• Est. completion date: December 2025

Study information

• Verified date: April 2024
• Source: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
• Contact: Beatrice Hoffmann, MD
• Phone: 617-754-2323
• Email: bhoffma2[@]bidmc.harvard.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of ultrasound guided hematoma block versus traditional "blind" hematoma block for analgesia in distal radius fracture reduction.

Description:

Hematoma blocks are safe and effective in providing analgesia for fracture reduction1-4. They involve injecting lidocaine directly into the fracture line for analgesia. The physician aspirates blood prior to injection to confirm placement in the hematoma created by the fracture. However, the procedure can be technically difficult if the fracture line is difficult to palpate, for example, due to significant swelling or body habitus. Ultrasound has been shown to improve efficacy in other analgesic procedures such as peripheral nerve blocks5 and also in identifying fracture lines6. There have been case reports and case series which have shown the feasibility and effectiveness of ultrasound guided hematoma blocks for analgesia in patients undergoing reduction for distal radius fractures7,8. To our knowledge there are no randomized controlled trials comparing the use of ultrasound guided hematoma blocks versus traditional hematoma blocks in achieving analgesia for distal radius fracture reduction. In this study, we will determine if ultrasound improves the efficacy of analgesia when performing hematoma blocks for reduction of distal radius fractures.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 115
• Est. completion date: December 2025
• Est. primary completion date: August 2025
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 100 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adult patient = 18 years old presenting to the emergency department with complaint of distal radius fracture

Exclusion Criteria:

• High acuity/distress per the Attending ED physician
• Altered mental status or intoxication
• Aphasia, mental retardation, dementia, or insurmountable communication barrier
• Acute psychiatric illness

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Distal Radius Fracture
• Fractures, Bone
• Hematoma
• Radius Fractures
• Wrist Fractures

Intervention

Other:
• ultrasound guide
Patients randomized to this arm will have the hematoma block of the distal radial fracture with the guidance of a bedside ultrasound

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Boston	Massachusetts

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center	Harvard University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (8)

Alioto RJ, Furia JP, Marquardt JD. Hematoma block for ankle fractures: a safe and efficacious technique for manipulations. J Orthop Trauma. 1995 Apr;9(2):113-6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199504000-00004. — View Citation

Atkinson P, Lennon R. Use of emergency department ultrasound in the diagnosis and early management of femoral fractures. Emerg Med J. 2003 Jul;20(4):395. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.4.395. No abstract available. — View Citation

Crystal CS, Miller MA, Young SE. Ultrasound guided hematoma block: a novel use of ultrasound in the traumatized patient. J Trauma. 2007 Feb;62(2):532-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000244398.89188.9c. No abstract available. — View Citation

Furia JP, Alioto RJ, Marquardt JD. The efficacy and safety of the hematoma block for fracture reduction in closed, isolated fractures. Orthopedics. 1997 May;20(5):423-6. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19970501-11. — View Citation

Johnson PQ, Noffsinger MA. Hematoma block of distal forearm fractures. Is it safe? Orthop Rev. 1991 Nov;20(11):977-9. — View Citation

Kiely PD, O'Farrell D, Riordan J, Harmon D. The use of ultrasound-guided hematoma blocks in wrist fractures. J Clin Anesth. 2009 Nov;21(7):540-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.01.008. No abstract available. — View Citation

Singh GK, Manglik RK, Lakhtakia PK, Singh A. Analgesia for the reduction of Colles fracture. A comparison of hematoma block and intravenous sedation. Online J Curr Clin Trials. 1992 Oct 1;Doc No 23:[3614 words; 43 paragraphs]. — View Citation

Walker KJ, McGrattan K, Aas-Eng K, Smith AF. Ultrasound guidance for peripheral nerve blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD006459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006459.pub2. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Pain Reduction as indicated by Visual Analog Scale	Subjects will be surveyed on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on their pain during 4 points: prior to receiving hematoma block, after receiving hematoma block, during reduction and prior to discharge	4 hours after initiation of study procedure