Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine

Diarrhea, Infantile Clinical Trial

— BEST  

Official title:

Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine in India

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT01345695
• Other study ID #: Pro00027527
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: April 25, 2011
• Last updated: December 14, 2015
• Start date: May 2011
• Est. completion date: October 2015

Study information

• Verified date: December 2015
• Source: Duke University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Institutional Review BoardIndia: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will conduct an evaluation of the World Health Partners (WHP) private provider project to see if the social franchising and telemedicine project has an impact on health outcomes in treatment vs. control areas. The evaluation will also estimate specific parameters of the WHP program that can be used to maximize financial sustainability and replicability/scalability of the program.

Description:

In 2011, World Health Partners (WHP) will launch a large social franchising program of healthcare delivery in Bihar, India, with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). The WHP project is particularly innovative in integrating a social franchising delivery model with a telemedicine platform. Although social franchising models of delivery are becoming increasingly common, to our knowledge, none of these efforts has been rigorously evaluated.

COHESIVE-India plans to undertake an evaluation of the BMGF-financed WHP project. The overarching focus of the evaluation project (called Bihar Evaluation of Social Franchising and Telemedicine (BEST)) is to provide evidence on the performance and effectiveness of the WHP program. In addition to studying the overall impact and effectiveness of the social franchising and telemedicine program, the evaluation will estimate how the WHP model influences outcomes related to two target diseases of interest to BMGF: childhood diarrhea and childhood pneumonia.

The Evaluation Design The core objective of the evaluation is to estimate the causal impact of the WHP program on BMGF target disease outcomes as well as other indicators of its primary health care success. The key design feature of the evaluation is that it relies on the franchisee network model of the WHP program. The evaluation design involves identifying villages in Bihar that have asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL) connectivity where WHP is likely to find providers who would participate in the program. The areas surrounding these villages that form catchment areas for providers will be identified; 360 such areas will be randomly sampled from the list and divided into 180 treatment and 180 control areas for implementation of the WHP program.

The study also includes a detailed costing component to estimate the costs associated with the target diseases and the benefits from the program intervention. In doing so, the evaluation strategy addresses specific policy-relevant questions about sustainability, affordability, replicability, and future Government support for privately provided healthcare options in Bihar as well as in other parts of India.

In addition, COHESIVE-India, with funding from external sources also plans to conduct studies that will provide insights on how to improve the effectiveness of the WHP model, as well as its financial sustainability. These studies include the distribution of vouchers for WHP services to estimate household's willingness to pay for them, as well experiments on financial incentives to learn how to improve the performance of network providers.

This evaluation is closely aligned with the objectives of the Government of Bihar to reduce the burden of disease. Through a rigorous evaluation of the WHP program, this study will provide evidence on whether this model of rural health service delivery is efficient and whether it can be scaled up. The stated goals of the WHP program indicate the many potential health and economic benefits to the people of Bihar. The evaluation will provide an empirical and objective assessment of the impact of WHP's effort on quality of care available in rural areas (the program anticipates a significant improvement), increases in access to healthcare providers and improved drug supply, reductions in time lapse between onset of disease and optimal care, as well as reductions in unnecessary healthcare expenditures.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 106380
• Est. completion date: October 2015
• Est. primary completion date: December 2014
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: N/A and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Households with children age < 60 months

• Persons with tuberculosis or visceral leishmaniasis

• Rural private sector medical providers

Exclusion Criteria:

• Households without children

• Households with children aged > 60 months

Study Design

Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Prospective

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Childhood Pneumonia
• Diarrhea, Infantile
• Pneumonia

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
India	BEST	Patna	Bihar

Sponsors (6)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Duke University	Institute of Socio-Economic Research in Development and Democracy (ISERDD), Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), Sambodhi Research and Communication Pvt., Ltd., Stanford University, University College, London

Country where clinical trial is conducted

India, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Improvements in population based health outcomes	Improvements in population based health outcomes in the treatment vs. the control areas	Baseline; 3 years	No
Secondary	Improvements in population based health outcomes for childhood diarrhea	Proportion of children with diarrhea in the last two weeks who were treated with zinc	Baseline; 3 years	No
Secondary	Improvements in population based health outcomes for childhood pneumonia	Proportion of children with suspected pneumonia in the past two weeks who received a full course of antibiotics (five days)	Baseline; 3 years	No
Secondary	Cost-effectiveness of the service model	Through micro-experiments, we hope to gain insights on how to improve the cost effectiveness of the WHP model, as well as evaluate its financial sustainability. We will also evaluate whether the are overall improvements in the population level health indicators in the treatment vs. the control areas.	Baseline; 3 years	No