View clinical trials related to Diagnosis.
Filter by:After neoadjuvant therapy, the primary lesion in breast cancer patients may experience tumor regression, which increases the difficulty of distinguishing between breast cancer and adjacent tissues. Raman spectroscopy is a form of scattering spectroscopy, which offers rapid and sensitive analysis, delivering detailed biochemical information and molecular signatures of internal molecular components within the sample. This study aims to discern between cancer and adjacent tissues after neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients using label-free Raman spectroscopy.
The aim of this study is to propose an intelligent diagnosis and treatment system for for pelvic floor dysfunction in elderly women. The main question it aims to answer: 1) How can the investigators find out early if older women have different pelvic floor muscle functions? 2）How can the investigators give personalized treatment plans based on differences in pelvic floor function? Participants will be assigned different training programs by the system. The investigators will compare the treatment effects and costs of older women with pelvic floor dysfunction using and not using the system. All the participants will be offered examinations for pelvic floor function and different treatments. All examinations and treatments are non-invasive.
The aim of this Study is to collect radiologist feedback to support the further development and improvement of the imaging modes implemented on the embedded software in the SuperSonic® Ultrasound System (including the probe).
This study aims to validate a novel antibiotic susceptibility test (InSignia) for gonorrhoea in patient clinical samples. The hypothesis is that the InSignia test will be able to detect transcriptional responses after incubation in antibiotic for susceptible strains and not resistant strains. Furthermore, this study will also add to our understanding on the performance of this test in various clinical specimens.
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occupying a disquieting position as the second most prevalent and deadliest neoplasm worldwide, afflicts an estimated 30% of its patients with intracranial metastatic spread. Among these, leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an exceptionally surreptitious and perilous manifestation, often evading timely and accurate diagnosis. The clinical landscape is further complicated by the presence of patients who, due to various reasons, are unable to undergo lumbar puncture, a procedure crucial for the investigation of LM. Moreover, even when cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis via conventional cytological and immunohistochemical methods is attempted, a definitive diagnosis of LM may remain elusive in a subset of cases. Intrathecal chemotherapy, particularly via the administration of pemetrexed, which has demonstrated both notable efficacy and an acceptable safety profile when delivered directly into the cerebrospinal space, constitutes a cornerstone of treatment for NSCLC-LM. Despite its importance, the lack of robust, validated biomarkers to gauge the therapeutic response to such interventions represents a significant knowledge gap. This deficit is compounded by the inherent challenges associated with CSF samples, including their limited availability and the suboptimal sensitivity and high resource demands of current ctDNA assessment techniques. To address these pressing diagnostic and monitoring needs in NSCLC-LM management, the investigator proposes a forward-looking, non-interventional clinical study harnessing the power of cutting-edge proteomic technologies. These platforms, characterized by their high throughput, exquisite sensitivity, and minimal sample volume requirements, offer a promising avenue for elucidating the intricacies of chemotherapy response in intrathecal therapy. The study aims to provide valuable insights into improving diagnostic accuracy for LM in NSCLC patients and to establish a more rigorous framework for assessing treatment efficacy in individuals undergoing intrathecal chemotherapy, ultimately contributing to enhanced patient care and personalized therapeutic strategies.
72 adult patients who underwent lumbar spine anteroposterior DXA and QCT examinations at Qianfoshan Hospital in Shandong Province from January 2019 to December 2022 were selected, with an interval of no more than 3 months between the two examinations for the same patient. 1. Record the patient's age, gender, height, and weight; Review the patient's past medical history (especially whether there is a history of brittle fractures, whether there is a history of using drugs that affect bone metabolism, etc.). 2. Retrieve the bone density values of the anterior lumbar vertebrae 1 to 4 measured by GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy dual energy X-ray absorptiometry from the database, and take the average (DXA bone density value). According to the diagnostic criteria of the Diagnosis and Treatment Guidelines for Primary Osteoporosis (2022), determine whether the patient has normal bone mass, decreased bone mass, or osteoporosis. 3. Identify the lumbar spine bone density values (QCT bone density values) measured by the GE Gemstone CTHD750 CT instrument from the database. According to the diagnostic criteria of the Chinese Quantitative CT (QCT) Diagnosis Guidelines for Osteoporosis (2018), determine whether the patient has normal bone mass, decreased bone mass, or osteoporosis. 4. Statistical analysis was conducted on the normal bone density, bone loss, and number of osteoporosis diagnosed by DXA and QCT respectively, in order to explore the differences in the detection rates of osteoporosis between these two monitoring methods. The data was analyzed and processed using SPSS 21.0 statistical software, and the count data was expressed as a rate (%) χ 2-test, P<0.05 indicates statistically significant difference; Explore whether the difference in detection rates between the two is related to factors such as weight; Calculate the detection rates of osteoporosis using two detection methods in patients who have experienced brittle fractures, and preliminarily determine which detection method is more accurate in determining osteoporosis.
This study is a single centre intervention study to compare two methods of determining the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Subjects who receive radioactively labeled iothalamate (125I) and hippuran (131I) within the framework of routine clinical care, will be co-administered iohexol. The primary trial endpoint is the mGFR when administered 125I-iothalamate and 131I-hippuran versus iohexol. By determining the mGFR using both iohexol and iothalamate in the same patients, a direct comparison of the two methods can be made in terms of their accuracy and precision. This makes it possible to determine the potential use of the non-radioactive measurement method as an alternative to the radioactive method and thus lower the overall radioactive burden for patients and personnel.
It is difficult to determine the pathogens in the early stage of infection in critically ill patients, and empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for a long time is often necessary, leading to antibiotics drug resistance. Targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) can provide faster results for pathogen and related antibiotic resistant diagnosis. But it lacks sufficient clinical evidence. Evidence regarding the clinical diagnostic accuracy and drug resistance is needed to comprehensively evaluate targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) for diagnosis of patients in ICU who and will be critical to inform national policy.
This study will test the feasibility of ultrasound-guided sterile blood sampling for critically ill patients with suspected sepsis requiring blood culture. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the use of ultrasound for blood cultures in a population of patients which can present difficult venous access and requiring more than one venipuncture attempt in general clinical practice
This is an interventional with minimal risks and constraints (RIPH 2 in France), prospective, longitudinal, non-randomized, multicenter study. The present study will allow us to evaluate multiple factors assessing the Endotest® Diagnostic accuracy and its possible limitations. To characterize the Endotest® Diagnostic, the following parameters will be evaluated: - Repeatability: the verification of the invariability of its results without condition changes, - Circadian cycle: whether the circadian cycle affects the determination of the signature, - Intermediate fidelity: the verification of the invariability of its results with an operator change, - Interferences: the impact of different interferences on its results, - Stability: the possible modification of its results depending on the samples conditions of storage. The acts and procedures performed in this research will be divided into three visits: - Inclusion visit: performance of 4 Endotest® Diagnostics (3 at the visit and 1 at home) by the 60 included subjects, - "Circadian cycle" visit: performance of 17 Endotest® Diagnostics (14 at the visit and 3 post-visit at home) by 6 subjects selected after evaluation of the results of the inclusion visit, - "Repeatability-intermediate fidelity-interference-stability" visit: realization of 17 Endotest® Diagnostic by 10 or 16 subjects, depending on the results of the impact of the circadian cycle on the saliva signature. These subjects will be selected according to the results of the inclusion visit, excluding those who participated in the circadian cycle visit.