View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot.
Filter by:A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Comparative Parallel Study To determine the safety and effectiveness of EpiCord as compared to standard of care (SOC) therapy for the treatment of chronic, non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs)
More patients with diabetes mellitus have led to increasing rates of chronic non-healing wounds. These wounds are colonised with pathogens, including multi-drug resistant organisms. Despite repeated courses of antibiotics subsequent management is difficult due to devascularisation of surrounding tissues and healing failures. Ultimately, patients may require amputation. Electrolysed water is a novel antiseptic produced by passing an electric current through a mixture of tap water and salt. Microbiocidal activity is due to the presence of hypochlorous acid at neutral Ph. Irrigation of chronic wounds with electrolysed water reduces bacterial load and appears to encourage wound healing. Following an encouraging pilot study, we propose to compare electrolysed water against conventional management for diabetic patients with non-healing foot ulcers. Adult diabetics with chronic ulcers attending podiatry at Hairmyres Hospital will be recruited to receive regular debridement and irrigation of wounds using either in-use product (Prontosan™) or electrolysed water as part of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Strict enrolment criteria will be applied, with regular clinical assessment and microbiological screening. Lesions present for >6 weeks and >2cm will be photographed at trial entry and graded using standardised criteria. Wounds will be monitored for at least 12 weeks (max. 20), with primary composite end-point defined as complete healing; >50% healing of initial lesion; and/or avoidance of surgical intervention. Secondary endpoints are surgical intervention, including debridement or amputation; antibiotic therapy; and/or patient death. The main objective is to compare rapidity of wound healing using either in-use product or electrolysed water. Improved healing could potentially benefit patients who might otherwise progress to amputation. We will also monitor antimicrobial consumption in study patients throughout the trial. A final objective is to cost the use of electrolysed water vs cost of Prontosan in the routine management of diabetic foot ulcers.
This study will compare the proportion of patients who have wound closure within 12 weeks as well as the time to wound closure in patients receiving Artacent™ versus standard of care for treatment of non-healing lower extremity wounds. The recurrence of healed wounds will be assessed at 6 months via a telephone survey
Stem cell therapy has been a new and effective therapy in recent years for diabetic foot.This study intends to establish an optimal clinical research program, and attempts to break the technical bottleneck in the stem cell therapy for treating diabetes related vascular complications.
This trial will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of repeat dosing of UTTR1147A in participants with neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers that do not respond adequately to standard wound care. Participants across multiple sites will be assigned to one of five cohorts (Cohort A, B, C, D, and E) based on the eligibility criteria and randomized to receive subcutaneous (SC) injections of either UTTR1147A or placebo over 12 weeks in addition to standard wound care.
Stem cell therapy has been a new and effective therapy in recent years for diabetic foot.This study intends to establish an optimal clinical research program, and attempts to break the technical bottleneck in the stem cell therapy for treating diabetes related vascular complications.
The role of telemedical monitoring in diabetic foot care is still uncertain. The aim is to compare telemedical + standard and standard alone outpatient monitoring in the care of patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome of the overall study is the time of ulcer healing. The number of amputation, hospital admissions and surgical procedure will be also reported. Investigators hope to include 150 patients in this study.
This is a prospective study of participants with diabetic foot ulcers who will receive either maggot debridement therapy (MDT) or conventional dressing therapy (CDT). Wound healing time is the main outcome measure to compare the clinical efficacy of these two therapies. The investigators developed a hypothesis that MDT could achieve remarkable shorter time and better healing rate for wound closure when compared with CDT.
This is an observational, longitudinal real world registry of diabetic foot ulcers created from electronic health record data obtained in the course of clinical care. Data from certified electronic health records transmit data as part of the requirement to share data with a specialty registry under Objective 10 of Meaningful Use of an EHR.
This prospective case series is to gain additional clinical experience in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, by documenting and relating patient history (including baseline wound characteristics) and clinical outcomes (incidence of healing, rate of healing, and patient and physician satisfaction) in a group of study participants for whom the ReGenerCell™ Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (ReGenerCell™) is used in combination with conventional therapy for the closure of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Participants will receive ReGenerCell™ treatment in addition to standard care (debridement, cleansing, dressings, offloading).