View clinical trials related to Diabetic Foot Ulcer.
Filter by:This is a randomized, double-blinded, vehicle-controlled, parallel, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical BB-101 for the treatment of diabetic lower leg and foot ulcer.
A Phase 2a Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Topically Applied PEP-TISSEEL in Subjects with Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
Diabetic foot ulcer; It is a disease used to describe a series of lower extremity complications that may occur together with infection, ulceration or gangrene in individuals with diabetes and is coded as S91.3 and S91.8 in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Sharp debridement, one of the treatments for diabetic foot ulcers, is a short-term application performed with a sharp scalpel or scissors at the patient's bed or in outpatient clinic conditions. It should be performed by a skilled clinician with wound training. To our knowledge, no study has been found in the literature regarding the use of a stress ball as an intervention to prevent pain and anxiety during sharp debridement. In line with this information, this study will examine the effect of stress ball use on the pain and anxiety levels of patients with diabetic foot ulcers during wound debridement.
The purpose of this survey is to observe the efficacy and safety of EPIFIX® dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (DHACM) for the treatment of intractable diabetic foot ulcers or venous leg ulcers.
The goal of this prospective, multi-center, randomized, parallel-controlled, open-label clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Prontosan wound irrigation solution comparing with Normal Saline on the removal of wound bacterial biofilm through observing the morphological characteristics and development of bacterial biofilm in chronic wound patients with secondary infections. The main questions it aims to answer are: - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 7th day of treatment in Group A and Group B - Difference in scoring the positive rate of bacterial biofilm before the first treatment and on the 3rd day of treatment in Group A and Group B . - Positive detection rate of bacterial biofilm in group and group B before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and difference of the positive detection rate of biofilm among the two groups. - 4-phase typing of bacterial biofilm detected in Group A, Group B and Group C before the first treatment, and on the 3rd and 7th day of treatment, and the proportion difference of 4-phase typing of biofilm among the two groups. - Wound healing rate - Skin Infection Rating Scale (SIRS) score. - Distribution of inflammatory cells on the wound. - Detection rate of bacteria/drug-resistant bacteria on the wound and their correlation with the detection rate of bacterial biofilm. Participants will be randomized to experimental group or Control group, Prontosan Wound Irrigation Solution or normal saline will be extracted with syringe (Dosage 1-2ml/cm2), and the wound is rinsed 1 cm from the wound. Then, Prontosan wound irrigation solution or normal saline is used to saturate the gauze, and the gauze is applied to the wound for 15 minutes. After removing the gauze, cover it with oil gauze, then cover it with 8 layers of gauze and wrap it with a bandage.
This is a follow-up study to evaluate the safety for the subjects with ALLO-ASC-DFU treatment in phase 3 clinical trial (ALLO-ASC-DFU-302) for 24 months
The objective of this study is to document the performance and the safety of UrgoStart Plus® Border, UrgoStart Plus® Pad and UrgoStart Interface® in the local treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (neuropathic or neuroischemic - non-critical ischemia) and venous or mixed predominantly venous leg ulcers, in real life conditions and current practice, in France.
This is a phase 2 study performed in diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) patients with chronic non-healing, neuro-ischemic wounds to investigate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AUP1602-C.
This study is a platform study designed to efficiently test multiple biomarkers to identify diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) with a higher potential for healing versus not healing that ultimately could be applied at the point of care to drive personalized management decisions, and to better inform clinical trials of wound healing interventions
The purpose of this study is to develop a short message-based customized standardized diabetic foot ulcer patient education program, and to test the effect of the program on diabetic foot ulcer self-management behavior, self-efficacy, wound prognosis, and quality of life. The short message-based customized standardized patient education program combines several smartphone message-based standardized educational contents to construct a customized patient education program which is according to the needs of patients, thus providing individualized patient education in a timely manner