Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04831385 |
Other study ID # |
CREC 2021.266 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
May 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
August 31, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
March 2022 |
Source |
Chinese University of Hong Kong |
Contact |
Alice Kong, MD |
Phone |
3505 2648 |
Email |
alicekong[@]cuhk.edu.hk |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study is a RCT aiming to use CBT-I as intervention, compared to usual care as control,
to elucidate the effect of CBT-I on glycemic control, sleep quality, psychological outcomes,
and cognitive function in Hong Kong Chinese older T2D comorbid with insomnia.
Description:
Insomnia is the most common sleep disorders affecting 10% to 30% of the population, imposing
a huge burden on healthcare systems. While the amount of deep sleep (slow wave and rapid eye
movement) declines with age, older people are known to be at escalated risk of sleep
disturbances with 20-50% adults aged more than 65 years suffering from insomnia. Cognitive
behavioral therapy (CBT-I) is the recommended first line treatment of chronic insomnia.
However, only 40% Hong Kong Chinese adults seek help for insomnia and most of them have
treatment from Complementary Alternative Medicine (CAM) or western doctors for hypnotics and
none for CBT-I. Furthermore, there are increasing concerns regarding the potential negative
effects of hypnotics on glycemic control. From a meta-analysis including 17 studies involving
36,938,981 individuals with insomnia followed up for a mean period of 11.6 years, there was a
tendency of increased risk of mortality associated with hypnotic use.
CBT-I is well recognized as an efficacious treatment modality in people with chronic
insomnia. From the results of a systemic review and meta-analysis including 20 randomized
controlled trials (RCT) involving 1,162 participants with insomnia, intervention with CBT-I,
incorporated at least 3 of the following elements: cognitive therapy, stimulus control, sleep
restriction, sleep hygiene, and relaxation, CBT-I is demonstrated to improve sleep outcomes
namely sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO) and sleep efficiency (SE).
From another meta-analysis including 37 studies aiming to examine the effect of CBT-I for
insomnia comorbid with psychiatric and/or medical conditions including alcohol dependence,
depression, post-traumatic stress disorders, chronic pain, cancer, Parkinson disease,
coronary artery disease, pulmonary and renal diseases, CBT-I is also shown to improve sleep
parameters with beneficial effects greater in those comorbid with psychiatric than in medical
conditions. Although CBT-I is considered the first line treatment for chronic insomnia, the
effect of CBT-I on the functional outcomes of the comorbid medical conditions is unclear. To
date, there was one RCT in United States including 109 older adults (mean age 64.8 ±6.0
years) randomized to 2-hours group sessions (7-10 subjects per group) weekly over 4 months of
CBT-I (n=47), Tai Chi Chih (n=39) and sleep seminar (n=23), which found that participants
randomized to CBT-I had a lower risk of having increased biological risk (defined as having
≥4 biomarkers out of a total of 8) at 16-months ie 12 months post-intervention when compared
to those in sleep seminar only (odd ratio, OR=0.06, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.005-0.67,
p<0.01). However, the effect of CBT-I on changes of glycemia had not been reported in this
study. There is another pilot RCT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03713996;
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03713996), enrolled 28 type 2 diabetes (T2D) with
insomnia symptoms and recruitment was completed by 1 June 2019 (for 6-weeks intervention
including six 1-hour sessions of CBT-I versus health education), in which insomnia severity
was the primary outcome and random glucose by glucometer and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)
were the other outcomes measures; but the results of this pilot RCT are still pending. Taken
together, the effect of CBT-I on glycemic control and other outcomes in people with T2D
comorbid with insomnia are under-explored.
Diabetes is one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases affecting up to 463 million
people worldwide and this figure is estimated to rise to 700 million by 2045, accounting for
10.9% of world population. From the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), the
landmark trial of T2D, 0.9% difference in HbA1c between intensive treatment and conventional
treatment arms (HbA1c 7% versus 7.9%), resulted in 12% reduction of any diabetes related
endpoints (p=0.029). Although diabetes is prevalent and there is a wealth of evidence
supporting that good glycemic control can prevent diabetes related complications, many people
with diabetes across the globe do not reach glycemic goals. Our group has reported that <50%
T2D reached glycemic goal of HbA1c <7% in Hong Kong. Behavioral changes, along with lifestyle
modifications, are the cornerstones of diabetes management. Healthy diet and regular exercise
not only have beneficial effects on glycemic control in T2D, but also improves sleep in T2D
with insomnia. Sleep plays a pivotal role in regulating energy metabolism and updated
guidelines have included adequate sleep, on average 7 hours per night, as one of the key
elements of lifestyle therapy in diabetes management. Apart from quantity, quality of sleep
is also essential for well-being of an individual. Optimal treatment of insomnia in diabetes
may potentially help to improve glycemia although the importance of management of insomnia
has not received adequate clinical attention. Of note, there are higher percentage of people
with chronic insomnia suffering from diabetes than those without insomnia (13.1% versus 5%).
Our team has reported that, among 3,753 Hong Kong Chinese with T2D, around one out of ten T2D
had insomnia and insomnia is more commonly found in women than in men (11.4% versus 8.2%,
p=0.01). Interestingly, we found that T2D men with comorbid insomnia have worse glycemic
control, in terms of higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c, than their counterpart
without insomnia whereas such difference was not observed in women. Although insomnia is more
common in women, men with insomnia is at higher risk for insomnia related glycemic problems.
Other researchers have reported that people with T2D and insomnia symptoms have worse
self-care than their counterparts without insomnia symptoms and the suboptimal self-care
behavior in people with T2D comorbid insomnia is potentially the hurdle to achieve glycemic
goals.
Not only insomnia may worsen glycemic control of T2D, insomnia may also increase the risk of
development of cognitive impairment. From 981 Hong Kong Chinese T2D aged ≥60 years, without
cognitive impairment at baseline (58.1% men, mean age: 62.5±2.5 years, mean HbA1c 7.4±2.2%),
3.1% developed cognitive impairment after a median follow-up of 6.8 years (interquartile
range: 1.7 years), and T2D comorbid with insomnia has a 4-fold risk of development of
cognitive impairment compared to their counterpart without insomnia [unpublished data,
presented as poster in European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) in Barcelona in
2019, https://www.easd.org/annual-meeting/easd-2019.html]. While CBT-I improves sleep in
people suffering from chronic insomnia, there is a lack of evidence regarding the impact of
CBT-I on cognitive function.
Against this background and based on a multidisciplinary team experienced in CBT-I, including
endocrinologist, geriatrician, psychiatrist, clinical psychologist, behavioural therapist and
statistician, we propose to conduct a RCT with CBT-I as intervention, compared to usual care
as control, to elucidate the effect of CBT-I on glycemic control, sleep quality,
psychological outcomes, and cognitive function in Hong Kong Chinese older T2D men comorbid
with insomnia.