Comparative User Experiences With BD Nano™ PRO 4mm x 32G Extra Thin Wall Pen Needle vs Three Commercially Available Pen Needles

Diabetes Clinical Trial

Official title:

Comparative User Experiences With BD Nano™ PRO 4mm x 32G Extra Thin Wall Pen Needle vs the Artsana Insupen® Extr3me 4mm x 33G, Artsana Insupen® Extr3me 3.5mm x 34G and the Simple Diagnostics Comfort EZ™ 4mm x 33G Pen Needles

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03878758
• Other study ID #: DBC-18PENDL02
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 7, 2019
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: February 2020
• Source: Becton, Dickinson and Company
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a subject partially blinded, block randomized, prospective, single-visit, multi-center study to compare user experiences with BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs. three (3) thinner commercially available comparator pen needles (Artsana Insupen Extr3me 33G, Artsana Insupen Extr3me 34G and the Simple Diagnostics Comfort EZ™ 33G Pen Needles). The study will include up to 146 study subjects having Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.

Description:

The study will consist of one 60 to 120 minute visit in which pre-set doses of saline will be abdominally delivered by Subjects via a reusable insulin pen device. All pen needles will be attached by study staff. The pen needle outer cover and inner shield will be removed prior to subject use so that they will not be able to identify which device they are using. Subjects are to perform 12 injections into the abdomen (6 pairs of injections). Pairs of injections will be evaluated and each pair will contain one BD Nano™ PRO and one comparator pen needle. Within the 12 injections, each comparator will be injected twice, therefore each subject will experience 2 of each of the following pairs:

BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs Artsana Insupen Extr3me 4mm x 33G x 2 BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs Artsana Insupen Extr3me 3.5mm x 34G x 2 BD Nano™ PRO pen needle vs Simple Diagnostics Comfort EZ™ 4mm x 33G Each Subject will evaluate pain after completion of each pair of injections using a 15 cm relative Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 158
• Est. completion date: April 30, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: April 30, 2019
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 75 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Adults 18 to 75 years of age (inclusive)

2. Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes

3. Self-injecting using an injection pen for =3 months with any pen needle

4. Injecting a minimum of =10 units of insulin and/or Victoza at least once per day

5. Able to demonstrate proficiency using an injection pen into an injection model

6. Able and willing to provide informed consent

7. Able and willing to complete all study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

• a. Not self-injecting (example, injections completed by a family member) b. Self-injecting with a pen injector for less than 3 months c. Unwilling to inject into abdomen d. Unwilling to have hair at the injection area reduced with an electric razor if it is determined the hair will interfere with leakage evaluation e. Failure to confirm which pen needle (gauge and needle length) subject is currently using. To confirm, subject may be asked to bring their pen and pen needles to the site or site staff may confirm via medical record or pharmacy.

f. Pregnant (self-attestation) g. Currently taking anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).

h. History of a bleeding disorder i. History of recurrent dermatological conditions or skin disorder (e.g., psoriasis, eczema) j. Gross skin anomalies and abnormalities located at or very close to the injection sites that would significantly limit available injection space.

k. History of symptomatic low blood pressure or history of fainting (syncope) during hypodermic injections l. Use of any analgesic medications (prescription or OTC) within 24 hours of first study injection, and during the study (up to 162 mg per day of aspirin is permitted).

m. A current or previous medical or physical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the patient at risk or make them unable to perform study procedures or has the potential to confound interpretation of the study results n. Currently participating in another pen needle study o. Employed by, or currently serving as a contractor or consultant to BD or any diabetes injectable medication, injection pen, or pen needle manufacturer

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Diabetes

Intervention

Device:
• BD Nano™ PRO
Insulin Pen needle
• 33G Artsana Insupen Extr3me
Insulin Pen Needle
• 34G Artsana Insupen Extr3me
Insulin Pen Needle
• Simple Diagnostics Comfort EZ™
Insulin Pen Needle

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	TKL Research Inc.	Fair Lawn	New Jersey
United States	East West Medical Research Institute	Honolulu	Hawaii

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Becton, Dickinson and Company

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Other	Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Each of 3 Comparator Pen Needles (Total Injection Time)	Time from when subject when is depressed and time when removed from body.	Time of injection
Primary	Injection Site Pain for BD Nano PRO Needle Compared to Each of Three (3) Commercially Available Comparators	Injection pain as measured by a relative visual analog scale. This endpoint analyzes data for individual groups. User preference is assessed through a single question reported on a 150mm relative VAS scale with the BD Nano™ PRO pen needle Pen labeled at +75 mm and the Comparator pen needle labeled at -75mm. On this scale, zero represents no preference to either pen needle. Relative VAS scores range from -75mm to 75mm; positive scores reflect preference forBD Nano™ PRO and negative scores reflect preference for the comparator.; Scores from each of the paired injections (308 pairs for all participants) were pooled and a mean was calculated. The two-sided 95% confidence interval was calcuated for the average relative rating. A linear model was used to adjust for the order effect.; If the lower bound of the 95% CI is > -10cm, non-inferiority could be concluded. If the lower bound of the 95% CI is >0, superiority can also be concluded.	Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection
Secondary	Needle Bending in BD Nano™ PRO vs Each of 3 Comparator Pen Needles	Participants reported a visual score of needle bending. A score of at least 2, corresponding to >10 degrees of bending, was considered an event of a bent needle. Scores from each injection (308 for each needle type) were pooled and a mean was calculated. The incidence of bent needle events in the BD Nano™ PRO and each competitor were compared and the mean difference reported with a 95% confidence interval.	Scores were collected immediately after each paired injection
Secondary	Superiority of BD Nano™ PRO vs Each of 3 Comparator Pen Needles (Leakage)	After saline delivery equivalent to 30U of U100 insulin (0.3mL) and subject removal of pen needle from body, study staff used the provided materials and scale to absorb leakage from the pen needle tip and injection site to measure the amount of leakage. Leakage over 0.015g was counted as an event. The incidence of leakage (yes/no) was calculated for each groups and the mean difference calculated along with a 95% confidence interval. A positive score indicates fewer leakage events with the BD Nano™ PRO and a negative score indicates fewer leakage events with the competitor. Scores from each injection (308 for each needle type) were pooled and a mean was calculated. The incidence of needle leakage in the BD Nano™ PRO and each comparator were compared and the mean difference reported with a 95% confidence interval.	Leakage was measured directly after each injection
Secondary	Compare BD Nano™ PRO vs Each of 3 Comparator Pen Needles (Force)	Subject perceived force required to deliver dose; measured by a relative 5 point Likert scale. The scale ranged from -2 to 2, where positive scores indicated less thumb force required for the BD Nano™ PRO, and negative scores indicated less thumb force for the comparator. Scores from each of the paired injections were pooled and a mean was calculated.	Immediately after injection Pair