Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 Clinical Trial
Official title:
Patient Empowerment Through Predictive Personalised Decision Support (PEPPER)
Patient Empowerment through Predictive PERsonalised decision support (PEPPER) is an European Union (EU) funded research project to develop a personalised clinical decision support system for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) self-management. The tool provides insulin bolus dose advice, tailored to the needs of individuals. The system uses Case-Based Reasoning (CBR), an artificial intelligence methodology that adapts to new situations according to past experience. The PEPPER system also incorporates a safety module that promotes safety by providing glucose alarms, low-glucose insulin suspension, carbohydrate recommendations and fault detection.The principal research objectives are to assess the usability, safety, and technical proof of concept and feasibility of the PEPPER in participants with T1DM. Evaluation of safety is a priority and will be assessed throughout the clinical studies. The safety components only of the PEPPER system will initially be evaluated in an out-of-clinic environment (phase 1) and will measure incidence and percentage time spent in hypoglycaemia, evaluate usability and incidence of technical faults. Following the initial safety study, the overall PEPPER system (integrated with the CBR algorithm) will be assessed (phase 2) and the primary outcome will be percentage time spent in hypoglycaemia.
1. Description of the components of the PEPPER system: Decision support algorithm The
decision support algorithm is based on case-based reasoning (CBR). CBR is an artificial
intelligence technique that tries to solve newly encountered problems by applying the
solutions learned from solved problems encountered in the past. A combination of parameters
makes up the case problem presented to the CBR algorithm. Using this information the
algorithm will find a similar case scenario from the pool of previously encountered cases and
recommend an improved solution (insulin dose) to achieve the best possible outcome
(post-prandial blood glucose). Each new case includes information about the problem (e.g.
capillary blood glucose, meal information etc), solution (recommended insulin dose) and
outcome (post-prandial blood glucose).
PEPPER offers a dual architecture for both Multiple Daily Injections (MDI) or Continuous
Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion (CSII) therapy. In both cases, the user periodically wears a
continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and an activity monitor.
Handset CSII version: The handset is a portable touch-screen device, which communicates
directly with the insulin pump or Smartphone with PEPPER application running and participants
can administer an insulin bolus with their usual pump.Its primary function in PEPPER is to
allow the user to precisely manage insulin therapy by accepting or rejecting bolus insulin
dose recommendations, calculated by the CBR based decision support algorithm, via a graphical
interface. In addition, it measures and automatically records glucose levels (via a built-in
Blood Glucose (BG) strip reader) and allows logging of food intake and other parameters.
MDI version: This handset is a commercially available Smartphone with the insulin
recommendation application running locally on a standard operating system such as iPhone
Operating System (iOS) or Android. It has the same functionality as the CSII version, except
that it does not have a built-in capillary blood glucose (CBG) reader but instead imports
data wirelessly from external CBG monitors.
Secure web server Revision: The handset wirelessly reports the user's case history to the
secure portal, a web site which allows the clinician to add new patients, and review the
cases to decide which ones should be kept. A case comprises multiple parameters such as
carbohydrate intake, BG reading, meal composition, physical activity and hormone cycle.
Personal Health Record on the secure portal allows patients and clinicians to view and update
selected components of the detailed history.
Insulin delivery system MDI: it will be provide insulin pens with 0,5 IU of insulin. CSII:
will use Cellnovo insulin pump or their usual pump.
Continuous glucose monitoring system The glucose sensor that will be used throughout the
clinical studies is the Dexcom sensor (CE marked, manufactured by Dexcom). This current is
proportional to the glucose concentration in interstitial fluid and is calibrated against
blood glucose a minimum of 12-hourly. The Dexcom CGM data is automatically transmitted to a
secure web-based server and the secure PEPPER web-portal. Participants will be able to see
their CGM data at all times and this will be used continuously throughout the studies.
Safety features Low and high glucose alarms will be incorporated to alert the user when hypo-
and hyperglycaemia is detected to enable the user to act accordingly to bring the glucose
levels back to target range.
Glucose prediction algorithm for hypoglycaemia prediction The hypoglycaemia prediction
algorithm will enable the system to automatically activate the low glucose suspension feature
in pump participants (suspension of insulin delivery until glucose levels are within the
target range) and/or trigger an adaptive carbohydrate adviser, which will recommend a
personalised carbohydrate snack.
Insulin safety constraints Personalised maximum insulin dose thresholds will be incorporated
to prevent overdosing on insulin.
Fault detection Insulin pumps and CGMs are well-established technologies, but faults in these
devices (e.g. pump occlusion, loss of sensor sensitivity) may occur. A fault detection system
will identify such faults and alert the user to recommend a corresponding action to revert to
the normal state.
Participants will have the opportunity to call a physician for medical support and an
engineer for technical support 24 hours a day.
2.2 Recruitment This is a multicentre study and recruiting for the clinical study will be
undertaken in the diabetes clinics at the Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Girona
(IdIBGi) (Spain) and the Imperial College London (ICL) (UK) from registered research
databases and from interested participants who contact us.
2.3 Clinical studies: 2.3.1 Phase 1 Objective: To demonstrate safety and technical proof of
concept of the PEPPER safety system (without the CBR algorithm) in the participant's own
environment.
Primary outcome and secondary outcomes are defined in Outcome Measures. Timescale: Each
participant will be in the study for 8 weeks: run-in period (2 weeks period) and intervention
period (6 weeks period). It is anticipated that it will take 6 months to complete this phase.
Population: 15 adults with T1DM (7 on MDI and 8 in CSII)
Visit 1: Screening Signed and dated informed consent Demographics data (date of birth,
gender, race and ethnicity) Medical and surgical history and allergies to medication Details
of the diabetes history Menstrual history and contraception (females) Medications and
supplements Social history including drinking, smoking and drug habits Vital signs ECG Random
venous blood and urine sample Urine pregnancy test in female participants of childbearing age
Basic diabetes education revision, Insulin treatment adjusted if needed Questionnaires to be
completed Participants will be provided with the real-time (RT) CGM (Dexcom) The participant
will be instructed how to make correct CGM calibration. Quality control testing will be
performed on the study devices as recommended in the manufacturer guidelines Participants
will be shown how to insert the sensor themselves, interpret the CGM data in real time and to
set the hypo- and hyperglycaemia threshold alarms. The alarm threshold will be set at 4mmol/l
and 11mmol/l and participants will be encouraged to keep it at those levels and not to reduce
the hypoglycaemia threshold below 3.3mmol/L) Participants to complete a 2-weeks run-in period
using RT-CGM (Dexcom) and a standard bolus calculator to familiarize themselves with RT-CGM.
Participants on MDI will be provided with the study CBG meter Participants on CSII will be
provided with the Cellnovo study pump or they will used their usual pump. A standardised
physical activity monitor will be provided and participants will be shown how to use it.
Detailed user guides (Cellnovo, Dexcom CGM, PEPPER handset) will be given to the participants
and an instruction sheet with 24-hour contact information of the research team to address any
problems or questions.
Visit 2: CGM review and study start Attend 2 weeks after visit 1 CGM data review Insulin
treatment adjusted if needed.Switch on the PEPPER handset (CBR algorithm disabled).
Visit 3: 2-week visit Attend 2 weeks after visit 2 at clinical research unit CGM data review
Insulin treatment adjusted if needed Review any technical issues.
Visit 4: Final visit (6 weeks after visit 2) CGM data review Switch off PEPPER system and
return device Participants to revert to their usual treatment Questionnaires to be completed.
2.3.2 Phase 2: Clinical evaluation of safety, feasibility and usability of the PEPPER system.
Objective: To demonstrate safety and technical proof of concept of the overall PEPPER system
(integrated with the CBR algorithm).
Primary outcome and secondary outcomes are defined in Outcome Measures. Timescale and
population are the same as in phase 1. Visit 1: Screening Same as for phase 1 Visit 2: CGM
review and study start Switch on the PEPPER handset (CBR algorithm and PEPPER safety system
enabled) The rest of steps the same as in phase 1 visit 2 Visit 3: 2-week visit Same as in
phase 1 visit 3 Visit 4: 6-week visit (6 weeks after visit 2) Same as in phase 1 visit 4
Visit 5: Final visit Step 5 of usability study 2.3.3 Usability study Usability of the system
will be evaluated throughout the clinical trial phases and redevelopment of the system will
be done accordingly.
Objectives: to evaluate usability of the PEPPER handsets over a sustained time period.
Step 1: Training observation Participants will be trained in use of devices. The handset will
be filmed during the training to see which aspect is being described.
Step 2: Contextual interview The aim is to gather data at an early stage of the usability
engineering process. They will be used to understand the intended use of all parts of the
system and the characteristics that relate to safety, within an everyday context. The
interview will be semi-structured with choice of questions.
Step 3: Diary study Data will be collected via the Smartphone in a variety of formats. The
study follows on from the contextual interview and concludes with an exit interview.
Participants will also be phoned at weekly intervals to see how they are finding the bolus
advice and to check that there are no problems.
Data collection. Participants will be asked to make diary entries each time they use the
PEPPER bolus advisor. Data will be collected using a Smartphone app. It may take a variety of
formats including photos, voice memos, text. In addition, written notes will be made after
each weekly phone call.
Step 4: Diary exit interview The purpose is to drill down into some of the diary entries to
discover supplementary information. Participants will be asked to review each of the diary
entries, giving further explanation.This will be followed by an unstructured interview.
The diary will be filmed during the conversation to see which entry is being described.
Step 5: Contextual group All of the members of the feasibility study will be invited to a
social meeting in an informal location. The purpose of the session will be to validate the
findings from the previous steps.The researcher will endeavour to be an unobtrusive bystander
in the discussion, and not offer personal opinions but listen for common issues and themes.
Data collection. Data will be gathered on a notepad or laptop in a visible way. Data will be
gathered using an audio recorder in steps 1-4. 2.4 Statistics The sample size is comparable
to other technology pilot safety studies, is a realistic number for recruitment and provides
robust safety data. The study is not powered to show a change in the primary or secondary
outcomes compared with usual care but is an assessment of a new technology.
2.5 Confidentiality of data collected during interviews To ensure security, data obtained
during the course of the interviews will be encrypted and stored securely, with access
limited solely to the researchers. Data will be de-identified such that only the researchers
will be able to link the data to the participant involved using reversible codes. This is
done purely for the purpose of comparison and evaluation across the separate interviews. Any
resulting publications using the data will not identify the participants, and any quotes will
kept anonymous should participants consent to this.
2.6 Electronic data storage on secure web-server Data security and privacy will be a priority
whilst dealing with medical data such as that held in the PEPPER system. During the clinical
studies (phases 1-2) anonymous clinical data will be entered and stored on a secure
web-server. Anonymous data collected by the PEPPER handset (such as glucose, meal
information, physical activity, alcohol, exercise) and the Dexcom CGM system will be
automatically transmitted to the secure web-server. For this purpose, EU regulatory
procedures (Directives 95/46/EC and 2002/58/EC) will be observed. Medical data will be stored
and protected against non-authorised access; transmission of data will be secured; only
authorised users will have access to services and stored data. Authentication will be
required for application use and data synchronisation. PEPPER will operate according to
standard interoperability guidelines (e.g. HL7), so that information can be exchanged
seamlessly between the various components. Authorised users will include study team members
from the PEPPER collaborators. Collaborators will only be able to view anonymous PEPPER
handset data.
The data generated by the study will be analysed by the collaborative PEPPER research team at
their respective sites. The analysis will be on anonymised data which will be aggregated
during joint meetings on either clinical site.
Missing, unused, and spurious data will be assessed on an individual basis and may be
ignored, withdrawn or the visit may be removed from the analysis with appropriate
justification adjudicated by the Principal Investigator.
2.7 Adverse Events (AEs) Reporting Procedures All adverse events will be reported. Depending
on the nature of the event the reporting procedures below will be followed. Any questions
concerning adverse event reporting will be directed to the Chief Investigator in the first
instance.
Non serious AEs: All such events will be recorded. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs): An SAE form
will be completed and faxed to the Chief Investigator within 24 hours. However,
hospitalisations for elective treatment of a pre-existing condition do not need reporting as
SAEs.
Reports of related and unexpected SAEs will be submitted within 15 days of the Chief
Investigator becoming aware of the event. The Chief Investigator will also notify the Sponsor
of all SAEs, where in the opinion of the Chief Investigator, the event is:
- 'related', i.e resulted from the administration of any of the research procedures; and
- 'unexpected', i.e an event that is not listed in the protocol as an expected occurrence
Local investigators will report any SAEs as required by their Local Research Ethics
Committee, Sponsor and/or Research & Development Office.
;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed |
NCT04030091 -
Pulsatile Insulin Infusion Therapy in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
Phase 4 | |
| Terminated |
NCT03605329 -
Evaluation of the Severity of Cardiovascular Autonomic Neuropathy in Type 1 Diabetic Patients With OSAS
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT01696266 -
An International Survey on Hypoglycaemia Among Insulin-treated Patients With Diabetes
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT06050642 -
Study of the Impact of PROximity Support for Patients With Type 1 DIABetes Treated With an Insulin Pump or Closed Loop.
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05107544 -
Metabolic, Physical Fitness and Mental Health Effects of High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04443153 -
Adapting Diabetes Treatment Expert Systems to Patient in Type 1 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04521634 -
Glycaemic Variability in Acute Stroke
|
||
| Completed |
NCT04569994 -
A Study to Look at the Safety of NNC0363-0845 in Healthy People and People With Type 1 Diabetes
|
Phase 1 | |
| Completed |
NCT04089462 -
Effects of Frequency and Duration of Exercise in People With Type 1 Diabetes A Randomized Crossover Study
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03143816 -
Study Comparing Prandial Insulin Aspart vs. Technosphere Insulin in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections: Investigator-Initiated A Real-life Pilot Study-STAT Study
|
Phase 4 | |
| Completed |
NCT01892319 -
An International Non-interventional Cohort Study to Evaluate the Safety of Treatment With Insulin Detemir in Pregnant Women With Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Pregnancy Registry
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT04039763 -
RT-CGM in Young Adults at Risk of DKA
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04042207 -
Diabeloop for Highly Unstable Type 1 Diabetes
|
N/A | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT06068205 -
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE MORPHO-MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF RED BLOOD CELLS EXTRACTED FROM DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT MICROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS
|
||
| Recruiting |
NCT05909800 -
Prolonged Remission Induced by Phenofibrate in Children Newly Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes.
|
Phase 2 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04974528 -
Afrezza® INHALE-1 Study in Pediatrics
|
Phase 3 | |
| Completed |
NCT04530292 -
Home Intervention and Social Precariousness in Childhood Diabetes
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05428943 -
OPT101 in Type 1 Diabetes Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03988764 -
Monogenic Diabetes Misdiagnosed as Type 1
|
||
| Completed |
NCT05597605 -
The SHINE Study: Safety of Implant and Preliminary Performance of the SHINE SYSTEM in Diabetic Subjects
|
N/A |