Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02849080
Other study ID # NN9924-4257
Secondary ID 2015-005593-38U1
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date September 20, 2016
Est. completion date March 27, 2019

Study information

Verified date July 2022
Source Novo Nordisk A/S
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This trial is globally conducted. The aim of this trial is to investigate Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide Using a Flexible Dose Adjustment Based on Clinical Evaluation versus Sitagliptin in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 504
Est. completion date March 27, 2019
Est. primary completion date February 28, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: Main phase (the inclusion criteria for the main phase are not reassessed for the extension phase): - Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial - Male or female, age above or equal to 18 years at the time of signing informed consent. For Korea only: Male or female, age above or equal to 19 years at the time of signing informed consent - Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 90 days prior to day of screening - HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.5-9.5% (58-80 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) - Treatment target of HbA1c below 7.0% (53 mmol/mol), as judged by the investigator - Stable daily dose(s) of 1-2 of the following anti-diabetic drugs within 90 days prior to the day of screening: - Metformin (equal or above 1500 mg or maximum tolerated dose as documented in the subject medical record) - Sulfonylureas (equal or above half of the maximum approved dose according to local label or maximum tolerated dose as documented in subject medical record) - Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors - Thiazolidinediones (equal or above half of the maximum approved dose according to local label or maximum tolerated dose as documented in subject medical record) Extension phase: - Informed consent for the extension phase obtained before any trial-related activities for the extension phase. - On randomised treatment with or without rescue medication at week 52. Exclusion Criteria: Main phase (the exclusion criteria for the main phase are not reassessed for the extension phase): - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measure as required by local regulation or practice). For certain specific countries: Additional specific requirements apply - Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol - Family or personal history of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 or Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - History of major surgical procedures involving the stomach potentially affecting absorption of trial product (e.g. subtotal and total gastrectomy, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass surgery) - Any of the following: myocardial infarction, stroke or hospitalisation for unstable angina or transient ischaemic attack within the past 180 days prior to the day of screening and randomisation - Subjects presently classified as being in New York Heart Association Class IV - Planned coronary, carotid or peripheral artery revascularisation known on the day of screening - Subjects with alanine aminotransferase above 2.5 x upper normal limit - Renal impairment defined as Estimated Glomerular Filtration rate 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 as per Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula - Treatment with any medication for the indication of diabetes or obesity other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before the day of screening. An exception is short-term insulin treatment for acute illness for a total of below or equal to 14 days - Proliferative retinopathy or maculopathy requiring acute treatment. Verified by fundus photography or dilated fundoscopy performed within 90 days prior to randomisation - History or presence of malignant neoplasms within the last 5 years (except basal and squamous cell skin cancer and carcinoma in situ) - History of diabetic ketoacidosis Extension phase: There are no new exclusion criteria for the extension phase

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
semaglutide
Oral administration once-daily.
sitagliptin
Oral administration once-daily.

Locations

Country Name City State
Argentina Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Caba
Argentina Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Corrientes
Argentina Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Rosario
Austria Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Graz
Austria Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Saint Stefan
Austria Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Wien
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Bonheiden
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Boussu
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Bruxelles
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Edegem
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Gent
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Leuven
Belgium Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Liège
Brazil Novo Nordisk Investigational Site São Paulo Sao Paulo
Egypt Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Alexandria
Egypt Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Cairo
Egypt Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Cairo
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Gangwon-do
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Gyeonggi-do
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Pusan
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Seoul
Korea, Republic of Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Suwon
Norway Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Hamar
Norway Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Oslo
Norway Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Oslo
Norway Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Stavanger
Norway Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Trondheim
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Bern
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Einsiedeln
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Genève 14
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Luzern 16
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Olten
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site St. Gallen
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site St. Gallen
Switzerland Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Winterthur
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Adana
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Ankara
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Antalya
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Istanbul
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Istanbul
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Istanbul
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Istanbul
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Istanbul
Turkey Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Rize
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Albuquerque New Mexico
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Atlanta Georgia
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Billings Montana
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Blackfoot Idaho
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Boynton Beach Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Chapel Hill North Carolina
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Chesapeake Virginia
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Cleveland Ohio
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Corpus Christi Texas
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Dallas Texas
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Evanston Illinois
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Flint Michigan
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Glendale Arizona
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Greenfield Indiana
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Greensboro North Carolina
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Greenville North Carolina
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Henderson Nevada
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Kingsport Tennessee
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Lake Worth Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Lancaster California
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Louisville Kentucky
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Mentor Ohio
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Metairie Louisiana
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Miami Lakes Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Muncie Indiana
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Murrells Inlet South Carolina
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Myrtle Beach South Carolina
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Oxon Hill Maryland
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Phoenix Arizona
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Port Orange Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Renton Washington
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Tampa Florida
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Wadsworth Ohio
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site West Hills California
United States Novo Nordisk Investigational Site Whiteville North Carolina

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Novo Nordisk A/S

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Argentina,  Austria,  Belgium,  Brazil,  Egypt,  Korea, Republic of,  Norway,  Switzerland,  Turkey, 

References & Publications (3)

Aroda VR, Bauer R, Christiansen E, Haluzík M, Kallenbach K, Montanya E, Rosenstock J, Meier JJ. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide by subgroups of patient characteristics in the PIONEER phase 3 programme. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 Jul;24(7):1338-1350 — View Citation

Buse JB, Bode BW, Mertens A, Cho YM, Christiansen E, Hertz CL, Nielsen MA, Pieber TR; PIONEER 7 investigators. Long-term efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide and the effect of switching from sitagliptin to oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabe — View Citation

Pieber TR, Bode B, Mertens A, Cho YM, Christiansen E, Hertz CL, Wallenstein SOR, Buse JB; PIONEER 7 investigators. Efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide with flexible dose adjustment versus sitagliptin in type 2 diabetes (PIONEER 7): a multicentre, open — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no) Participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% (American Diabetes Association (ADA) target) (yes/no), was evaluated at week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. The endpoint was also evaluated based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation. Week 52
Secondary Change in Body Weight Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 52. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. The endpoint was also evaluated based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in HbA1c Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in FPG Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in Body Weight (%) Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (kg) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in BMI Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, Week 52
Secondary Change in Waist Circumference Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in Total Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in total cholesterol (mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, Week 52
Secondary Change in LDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in HDL Cholesterol (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mmol/L) at weeks 26, 52 and 78 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in Triglycerides (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in triglycerides (mmol/L) at week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at week 52. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in DTSQ Change from baseline (week 0) in diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 52. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 0, Week 52
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c =6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) AACE Target (Yes/no) Participants who achieved HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5% (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target) (yes/no) at week 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52
Secondary Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss =5% (Yes/no) Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52
Secondary Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss =10% (Yes/no) Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 10% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at week 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no) Participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and without weight gain (yes/no) at week 52 is presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c Reduction =1% (10.9 mmol/Mol) and Weight Loss =3% (Yes/no) Participants who achieved HbA1c reduction more than or equal to 1% of their baseline HbA1c and weight loss of more than or equal to 3% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at week 52 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52
Secondary Time to Rescue Medication Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime during the periods, from week 0 to week 52. Rescue medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation. Weeks 0-52
Secondary Time to Additional Anti-diabetic Medication Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime during the period from week 0 to week 52. Additional anti-diabetic medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after randomisation (week 0) and before (planned) end-of-treatment (week 52), and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Weeks 0-52
Secondary Number of TEAEs During Exposure to Trial Product Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 57 (52-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase; 52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase). Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period: Time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0-57
Secondary Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 0-57 (52-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase; 52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 0-57
Secondary Paticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Yes/no) Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 0-57 (52-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase; 52-week treatment period plus the 5-week follow-up period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 0-57
Secondary Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemical parameter- amylase (units per liter [U/L]) to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, Week 52
Secondary Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseline) Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase (U/L) to week 52 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, Week 52
Secondary Change in Pulse Rate Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure) Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at week 52. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, week 52
Secondary Change in HbA1c- Switch Change from week 52 in HbA1c was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in Body Weight- Switch Change from week 52 in body weight was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in Body Weight (%)- Switch Relative change from week 52 in body weight (kg) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in FPG- Switch Change from week 52 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in BMI- Switch Change from week 52 in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, Week 104
Secondary Change in Waist Circumference- Switch Change from week 52 in waist circumference was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)- Switch Participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% (American Diabetes Association (ADA) target) (yes/no), was evaluated at week 104. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104 (i.e., after 52 weeks of treatment in the extension phase)
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c =6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) AACE Target (Yes/no)- Switch Participants who achieved HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5% (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target) (yes/no) at week 104 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104 (i.e., after 52 weeks of treatment in the extension phase)
Secondary Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss =5% (Yes/no)- Switch Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 104 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104 (i.e., after 52 weeks of treatment in the extension phase)
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)- Switch Participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0% without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and without weight gain (yes/no) at week 104 is presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104 (i.e., after 52 weeks of treatment in the extension phase)
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target and no Need for Rescue Medication (Yes/no)- Switch Participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% (American Diabetes Association (ADA) target) and no need for rescue medication (yes/no), was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation. Week 104 (i.e., after 52 weeks of treatment in the extension phase)
Secondary Time to Additional Anti-diabetic Medication- Switch Presented results are the number of participants who had taken additional anti-diabetic medication anytime during the period from week 53 to week 104. Additional anti-diabetic medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after re-randomisation (week 52) and before (planned) end-of-treatment (week 104), and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before (planned) end-of-treatment. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was re-randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Weeks 53-104
Secondary Time to Rescue Medication- Switch Presented results are the number of participants who had taken rescue medication anytime during the periods, from week 53 to week 104. Rescue medication was defined as any new anti-diabetic medication used as add-on to trial product and used for more than 21 days with the initiation at or after re-randomisation (week 52) and before last day on trial product, and/or intensification of anti-diabetic medication (a more than 20% increase in dose relative to baseline) for more than 21 days with the intensification at or after randomisation and before last day on trial product. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment without rescue medication observation period, which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, excluding any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature trial product discontinuation. Weeks 53-104
Secondary Number of TEAEs During Exposure to Trial Product- Switch Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 53 to week 109. Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period: Time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 53-109
Secondary Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseline)- Switch Change from week 52 in biochemical parameter- amylase (U/L) to week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 52, Week 104
Secondary Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseline)- Switch Change from week 52 in lipase (U/L) to week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 52, Week 104
Secondary Change in Pulse Rate- Switch Change from week 52 in pulse rate was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)- Switch Change from week 52 in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes- Switch Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 53 to 109. Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 53-109
Secondary Paticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Yes/no)- Switch Number of participants with treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 53 to 109. Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 53-109
Secondary Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)- Switch SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from week 52 in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at week 104. A positive change score indicates an improvement since week 52. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in DTSQ- Switch Change from week 52 in diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 104. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 52, week 104
Secondary Change in HbA1c- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in HbA1c was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in Body Weight (kg)- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in body weight was evaluated at week 104. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in Body Weight (%)- Sustainability Relative change from baseline (week 0) in body weight (kg) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in FPG- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in BMI- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in body mass index (BMI) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, Week 104
Secondary Change in Waist Circumference- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in waist circumference was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target (Yes/no)- Sustainability Participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% (American Diabetes Association (ADA) target) (yes/no), was evaluated at week 104. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c =6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) AACE Target (Yes/no)- Sustainability Participants who achieved HbA1c less than or equal to 6.5% (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) target) (yes/no) at week 104 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss =5% (Yes/no)- Sustainability Participants who achieved weight loss more than or equal to 5% of their baseline body weight (yes/no) at weeks 104 is presented. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0 % (53 mmol/Mol) Without Hypoglycaemia (Severe or BG Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia) and no Weight Gain (Yes/no)- Sustainability Participants who achieved HbA1c less than 7.0 % without severe or blood glucose (BG) confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia and without weight gain (yes/no) at week 104 is presented. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode with plasma glucose value <3.1 mmol/L with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104
Secondary Participants Who Achieve HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) ADA Target or HbA1c Reduction = 1%-Point (10.9 mmol/Mol) (Yes/no)- Sustainability Participants who achieved HbA1c <7.0% ADA target or HbA1c reduction = 1%-point (10.9 mmol/mol) (yes/no), was evaluated at week 104. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from the in-trial observation period, which was the time period from when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication and/or premature discontinuation of trial product. Week 104
Secondary Number of TEAEs During Exposure to Trial Product- Sustainability Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded from week 0 to week 109 ((104-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase or 52-week treatment period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase) plus the 5-week follow-up period). Adverse events (AEs) with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period: Time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0-109
Secondary Change in Amylase (Ratio to Baseline)- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in biochemical parameter- amylase (units per liter [U/L]) to week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in Lipase (Ratio to Baseline)- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in lipase (U/L) to week 104 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, Week 104
Secondary Change in Pulse Rate- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in pulse rate was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)- Sustainability Change from baseline (week 0) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was evaluated at week 104. Results are based on the data from the on-treatment observation period which was the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Number of Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes)- Sustainability Treatment emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 0-109 ((104-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase or 52-week treatment period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase) plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 0-109
Secondary Paticipants With Treatment-emergent Severe or BG-confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes (Yes/no)- Sustainability Number of participants with treatment-emergent severe or BG confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during weeks 0-109 ((104-week treatment period for participants who continued in the extension phase or 52-week treatment period for participants who did not continue in the extension phase) plus the 5-week follow-up period). Hypoglycaemic episodes with onset during the on-treatment observation period were considered treatment-emergent. On-treatment observation period was defined as the time period when a participant was on treatment with trial product, including any period after initiation of rescue medication. Severe hypoglycaemia was defined as an episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate or glucagon, or take other corrective actions. BG-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemia: Confirmed by a glucose value <3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia. Week 0-109
Secondary Change in SF-36v2 (Acute Version) Health Survey: Scores From the 8 Domains, the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS)- Sustainability Short form (SF)-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey of patient health that measures the participant's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured eight domains of functional health and well-being as well as two component summary scores (physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS)). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at week 104. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 0, week 104
Secondary Change in DTSQ- Sustainability Change from week 0 in diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire - status (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 104. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 1, 4 -8. For items 2 and 3 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 2) or low (item 3). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 1, 4-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the data from the in-trial observation period. Week 0, week 104
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT05666479 - CGM Monitoring in T2DM Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Replacement Surgery
Completed NCT05647083 - The Effect of Massage on Diabetic Parameters N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05661799 - Persistence of Physical Activity in People With Type 2 Diabetes Over Time. N/A
Completed NCT03686722 - Effect of Co-administration of Metformin and Daclatasvir on the Pharmacokinetis and Pharmacodynamics of Metformin Phase 1
Completed NCT02836704 - Comparison of Standard vs Higher Starting Dose of Insulin Glargine in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (Glargine Starting Dose) Phase 4
Completed NCT01819129 - Efficacy and Safety of FIAsp Compared to Insulin Aspart in Combination With Insulin Glargine and Metformin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Phase 3
Completed NCT04562714 - Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring in People With Type 2 Diabetes Using Non-Insulin Antihyperglycemic Therapy N/A
Completed NCT02009488 - Treatment Differences Between Canagliflozin and Placebo in Insulin Secretion in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Phase 1
Completed NCT05896319 - Hyaluronic Acid Treatment of the Post-extraction Tooth Socket Healing in Subjects With Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 N/A
Recruiting NCT05598203 - Effect of Nutrition Education Groups in the Treatment of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT05046873 - A Research Study Looking Into Blood Levels of Semaglutide and NNC0480-0389 When Given in the Same Injection or in Two Separate Injections in Healthy People Phase 1
Completed NCT04030091 - Pulsatile Insulin Infusion Therapy in Patients With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Phase 4
Terminated NCT04090242 - Impact of App Based Diabetes Training Program in Conjunction With the BD Nano Pen Needle in People With T2 Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT03604224 - A Study to Observe Clinical Effectiveness of Canagliflozin 300 mg Containing Treatment Regimens in Indian Type 2 Diabetes Participants With BMI>25 kg/m^2, in Real World Clinical Setting
Completed NCT03620357 - Continuous Glucose Monitoring & Management In Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) N/A
Completed NCT01696266 - An International Survey on Hypoglycaemia Among Insulin-treated Patients With Diabetes
Completed NCT03620890 - Detemir Versus NPH for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT05473286 - A Research Study Looking at How Oral Semaglutide Works in People With Type 2 Diabetes in Germany, as Part of Local Clinical Practice
Not yet recruiting NCT05029804 - Effect of Walking Exercise Training on Adherence to Disease Management and Metabolic Control in Diabetes N/A
Completed NCT04531631 - Effects of Dorzagliatin on 1st Phase Insulin and Beta-cell Glucose Sensitivity in T2D and Monogenic Diabetes Phase 2